Another bishop fails to put children first in dealing with abusive priest
It is difficult to understand what is going on in the Archdiocese of Newark these days. A priest of that archdiocese, Father Michael Fugee, was charged with sexual assault on a minor in 2001. He confessed to the police that he had grabbed the young boys crotch while wrestling with him on two occasions.
Imagine, then, the surprise of the folks in the Newark archdiocese when they found out that Father Fugee had been going on youth retreats and pilgrimages and was back to hearing the confessions of minors, in private, as all confessions must be.
http://www.uscatholic.org/blog/201305/another-bishop-fails-put-children-first-dealing-abusive-priest-27282?utm_source=May+7%2C+2013&utm_campaign=ebulletin+May+7%2C+2013&utm_medium=email|
As Catholics, we are taught to "avoid the near occasions of sin," meaning we should stay away from any temptation to a sin to which we may be prone to commit. By putting self-confessed pedophiles back into these near occasions of sin, Church officials are even more responsible for subsequent abuse than the abuser himself.
goldent
(1,582 posts)It sounds like a fairly clear-cut case.
BTW, the priest involved has resigned from the ministry.
meow2u3
(24,766 posts)The bishop needs the boot, too. He's the one responsible for the priest in the diocese, so the buck should stop with the bishop.
goldent
(1,582 posts)I'm not sure what the circumstances were for the priest resigning, but wanted to point it out.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)After all, Cardinal Law, the former archbishop of Boston, is living in gracious retirement in Rome. If I were Pope, he would have been named papal legate to Greenland or sent to do missionary work in Lesotho or be chaplain to a dirt-poor convent in Patagonia or something like that.
I noticed that Archbishop Myers was not mentioned by name in the U.S. Catholic story.