Catholics Against Capitalism
They try to fulfill the Lords command to feed His sheep with rhetoric
June 10, 2014 4:00 AM .
By Kevin D. Williamson
Something strange happened in Washington last week: A panel of Catholic intellectuals and clergy, led by His Eminence Oscar Andrés Maradiaga, was convened to denounce a political philosophy under the headline Erroneous Autonomy: The Catholic Case against Libertarianism. The conference was mainly about free-market economics rather than libertarianism per se, and it was an excellent reminder that the hierarchy of the Church has no special grace to pronounce upon matters of specific economic organization. The best that can be said of the clergys corporate approach to economic thinking is that it is intellectually incoherent, which is lucky inasmuch as the depths of its illiteracy become more dramatic and destructive as it approaches coherence.
The Catholic clergy is hardly alone in this. There is something about the intellectually cloistered lives of religious professionals that prevents them from engaging in anything but the most superficial way with the 21st-century economy. Consider Tricycle, the American Buddhist review, which periodically publishes hilariously insipid economic observations e.g., the bracingly uninformed writing of Professor Stuart Smithers of the University of Puget Sound religion department, whose review of Conscious Capitalism by Whole Foods CEO John Mackey and Raj Sisodia contains within it a perfect distillation of fashionable economic antithought. Like Cardinal Rodríguez Maradiaga, he writes about the structural problems of capitalism, but gives no evidence at all that he even understands what that structure is. Unfortunately, relatively few do.
As Marx pointed out, Professor Smithers writes, capital is full of contradictions. Capital not only creates wealth, value, and jobs it also destroys wealth, value, and jobs. Those wondrous technologies also manifest as wrathful deities, efficiently eliminating or reducing the need for labor. The implicit economic hypothesis here is that producing a certain amount of goods more efficiently in this case, with less labor makes the world worse off. (Why not use spoons?) The reality is the opposite, and that is not a matter of opinion, perspective, or ideology it is a material reality, the denial of which is the intellectual equivalent of insisting on a geocentric or turtles-all-the-way-down model of the universe.
The increasingly global and specialized division of labor and the resulting chains of production i.e., modern capitalism, the unprecedented worldwide project of voluntary human cooperation that is the unique defining feature of our time is what cut the global poverty rate in half in 20 years. It was not Buddhist mindfulness or Catholic homilies that did that. In the 200,000-year history of Homo sapiens, neither of those great religious traditions, nor anything else that human beings ever came up with, made a dent in the poverty rate. Capitalism did. One of the great ironies of our times is that so many of the descendents of the old Catholic immigrant working class have found themselves attracted to an American Buddhism that, with its love of ornate titles, its costumes, its fascination with apostolic succession, and its increasingly coddled professional clergy, is a 21st-century expression of Buddhism apparently committed to transforming itself plus ça change! into 15th-century Catholicism. Perhaps it should not be entirely surprising that it has embraced the same intellectual errors.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/379954/catholics-against-capitalism-kevin-d-williamson
Sorry for the source but when a pig squeals it's hard not to look at what it's squealing about.
rustbeltvoice
(430 posts)Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)The Marxist solution has failed, but the realities of marginalization and exploitation remain in the world, especially the Third World, as does the reality of human alienation, especially in the more advanced countries. Against these phenomena the Church strongly raises her voice. Vast multitudes are still living in conditions of great material and moral poverty. The collapse of the Communist system in so many countries certainly removes an obstacle to facing these problems in an appropriate and realistic way, but it is not enough to bring about their solution. Indeed, there is a risk that a radical capitalistic ideology could spread which refuses even to consider these problems, in the a priori belief that any attempt to solve them is doomed to failure, and which blindly entrusts their solution to the free development of market forces.
Sure sounds like JPII, who had first-hand experience of living under a Marxist regime, was no great fan of unbridled capitalism.