This may seem trivial on the surface,
BUT! While this is by far my favorite religious site, regardless of how long I've been off wandering, I did dawdle awhile on another allegedly Christian website that claims strong leftist credentials. By and large I found them reasonably compatible. Then they held an outdoor festival and naturally posted pictures, partly to publicize the tee shirts that are a major fundraiser for them.
My reasonably mild comment drew a rather hostile official response, however. I noted that most of the male readers were probably more focused on the two pastors' wives who were practically flashing all their female assets. I didn't even put it that bluntly, instead referring to 'barely-there tops' and their distraction from the publicized intent. But I'll wager the Hooters waitresses dress more appropriately than the two wives. I'm talking little more than pasties here.
Now of course they're all huffy with me. I noted that I didn't question anyone's faith or ethics, merely the absence of a reasonable dress code and its effect on tee shirt promotion. There are bound to be differences between generations, and I doubt any of us will wear a stitch in heaven. At least CS Lewis didn't seem to think so. I don't even have a problem with discreet nudists so long as they don't streak through my front yard or something. And anyone who loves Maxfield Parrish and other Victorian fine art the way I do shouldn't be mistaken for a hopeless prude.
What I do have a problem with is people who set themselves up as superior moral leaders and then get their shorts twisted when questioned even in a fairly mild manner.
And of course I do want to ask the men in this group, whatever their generation, whether they like their own beloved female family members 'dressed' that way. I'll ask my feminist friends to please spare me any false assumptions by blowing this question far out of proportion, too. When we marry we do need to be considerate of our partner's feelings. But one thing I've noticed watching DWTS; when the men have had any say-so about their partners' costumes, they've invariably designed more material, let's say.
What do YOU think about the whole shebang?
= new reply since forum marked as read
I did pass along your suggestion and offered regrets I couldn't comply.
You should watch what sort of mission you send me on; you know how easily I'm led, being a poor little weakminded woman! 
In my youth especially there were "hippies" of the sort who live perfectly (twisted) "family values" Republican lifestyles, except they smoke pot, wear tie-dye clothing, and the women don't wear bras while serving their men granola for breakfast. (Today most of them would call themselves Libertarians and shop at Whole Foods.) But behind the facade their society reeked of money, misogyny, fundamentalism, objectification of women, and racism... same as it ever was.
On the other hand there were quite conservative religious people who would let weirdos like me live in my car in their church parking lots, practice non-judgmental non-evangelical outreach to other community misfits such as myself, and still dress "nice" for church on Sunday. Even among the Catholics there would be powerful progressive women.
If there's any quick explanation for my own family values, I'm of a matriarchal, practical, socialist, Scandinavian, transplanted to the Wild West of the U.S.A. family... Clothing was always a practical matter. On a nice summer day nobody had swimsuits because swimsuits are useless clothing for most of the year. And in the depth of winter, bathing in the kitchen of a Housebarn full of people and a bunch of farm animals downstairs, modesty is all about how you act, never about what you happen to see.
Anyways, the church you describe is more likely a rigid patriarchy as both pastors are male... 
