Jewish Group
Related: About this forumIs Anti-Semitism a Thing of the past? - Part I
By Edward Rothstein
The 1000-Reichsmark bills on display at the New-York Historical Societys Anti-Semitism 1919-1939 exhibition seem almost unused, fresh from the 1922 German mint, probably because rampant inflation quickly made them worthless. That also made them ripe for resurrection by the Nazis 10 years later, when they were overprinted with campaign slogans, swastikas and caricatures. Stamped over one bills original engraving, Gothic German text proclaims: The Jew takes our Gold, Silver and Bacon [Speck], and leaves us with this crap [Dreck]. The DreckWeimars worthless currencyis evidence of the Jews nefarious powers. Come to Hitler, the recycled banknotes urge.
Another form of currency is also displayed at this compact but powerful exhibition of more than 50 German artifacts: a five-Reichsmark currency conversion note issued between 1933 and 1935. Soon after Adolf Hitler took power, Jews were dismissed from the civil service, Jewish businesses were boycotted and other restrictions were imposed: As the exhibitions catalog tells us, the Nazis saw this as Wiedergutmachung making good againreparations for Judaic evils done to Germany. Jews emigrating surrendered German currency in exchange for these notes, supposedly good for later conversion into foreign currencies. Only they werent. Thus, the Jew who made currency worthless got worthless currency in return. Such was Nazi Wiedergutmachung.
But what do these unusual bills demonstrate about the nature of Nazi anti-Semitism? Is there any connection between the objects in this exhibition and contemporary Jew hatred, which is gaining respectability? This is not a simple matter, because the exhibition is so specific to its time and place. That is how it first must be understood. These artifacts were all acquired by Kenneth W. Rendell for the Museum of World War II he has established in Boston, which is planning an expansive new building. They trace, as the exhibition puts it, the incremental stages by which anti-Semitism moved from ideology to state policy and finally, to war.
So the exhibitions first item is a broadside announcing the signing of the Versailles treaty on June 28, 1919a poster on which the young Hitler wrote a comment that the treaty was a surrender to the Jewish dictate; Jews, he declared, must leave Germany. Then we see 1920s broadsides for Nazi rallies, a childrens book by a 21-year-old kindergarten teacher warning about Jews, and the 1935 Nuremberg laws codifying anti-Semitism. The last artifacts are six handwritten pages: Hitlers notes for his 1939 Reichstag speech in which he foretold the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.
(snip)
Nazi analogies are too regularly invoked to simplify argument; and anti-Semitism is too often generalized, treated as another variety of racism. Instead, I am struck by how singular anti-Semitism is, how cunning the Nazi use of it was, and how different it is from racism, with which it is often confused. Of course, the Nazis calculatedly turned Judaism into a racial matter. The Nuremberg Laws led to genealogical charts, like one here, on which Germans traced their bloodlines to guarantee freedom from Jewish taint.
(snip)
But if race can be an element of anti-Semitism, it is not the main point. For the Nazis it was an indicator of connection and collusion. Is there any other form of group hatred so preoccupied with conspiracy? The Jew, in this view, has hidden powers. The Jew is capable of imposing the Versailles treaty, devaluing currency and manipulating commerce. In medieval folklore, the Jew is close to being a vampire, prepared to feed on the circulatory system of the body politic. And what is that circulatory system? Money. That is also where the Nazis focusedbefore turning more horrific attention to blood.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/anti-semitism-1919-1939-and-stolen-heart-the-theft-of-jewish-property-in-berlins-historic-city-center-1933-1945-reviews-1463002058
Behind the Aegis
(53,961 posts)Anti-Semitism certainly isn't a "thing of the past" of that one can be certain. While it may not be on the lips of most, at least in 'polite' company, it is very much there and bubbles up now and again. It is always interesting to watch it surface and just as interesting, watching those who rush in and claim it is a "tactic". I have seen all forms of anti-Semitism, from outright, in your face kinds to more clever, underhanded versions.
Today, we still see blood libels, though they are mostly directed at Israel and Israeli politicians. The ever present "Jews control XYZ" is still very common, though many simply switch out the word Jew for Zionist, and to the bigots, it magically is no longer anti-Semitism. But, IMO, perhaps the most persistent is the "Jews are more loyal to X (now Israel)" argument. In the past, Jews were capitalist dupes...in the Soviet Union, but communists and socialists (sometimes true, but not how it is used) in the Western World. Today, let a Jew disagree with a policy, and regardless of Israel's opinion, said Jew is a traitor and more loyal to Israel. And, G-d help that Jew if her/his opinion is the same or even similar to Israel, because then that is proof positive s/he is a disloyal traitor.
Like other forms of bigotry, anti-Semitism isn't always so cut and dried. It ranges from slights like "You are so generous for a Jew." to redefining anti-Semitism to include others, and sometimes even exclude Jews to complaining about anti-Semitism being "just as important as other bigotries, so why must we discuss it". Then there are the more nefarious rants coming from the likes of David Duke, Louis Farrakhan, and others. Of course, I would be remiss if I didn't mention the plethora of "The Jews/Israel did it" conspiracies which, like the rising of the sun, are always just over the horizon and just as predictable; everything from Gore's loss in Florida, to 9-11, to Sandy Hook!
Anti-Semitism will continued to be overlooked except in the most extreme of cases, and for some, they will continue to ignore, deride, dismiss, deflect, and even propagate anti-Semitism. Both sides of the aisle do it, but only one side pretends it isn't something which can "happen here."