Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 06:27 PM Feb 2013

Girls Lead in Science Exam, but Not in the United States

For years — and especially since 2005, when Lawrence H. Summers, then president of Harvard, made his notorious comments about women’s aptitude — researchers have been searching for ways to explain why there are so many more men than women in the top ranks of science.

Now comes an intriguing clue, in the form of a test given in 65 developed countries by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. It finds that among a representative sample of 15-year-olds around the world, girls generally outperform boys in science — but not in the United States.

What explains the gap? Andreas Schleicher, who oversees the tests for the O.E.C.D., says different countries offer different incentives for learning science and math. In the United States, he said, boys are more likely than girls to “see science as something that affects their life.” Then there is the “stereotype threat.”

“We see that very early in childhood — around age 4 — gender roles in occupations appear to be formed,” said Christianne Corbett, co-author of the 2010 report “Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math.” “Women are less likely to go into science careers, although they are clearly capable of succeeding.”


very interesting graph at link
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/02/04/science/girls-lead-in-science-exam-but-not-in-the-united-states.html?hp

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Girls Lead in Science Exam, but Not in the United States (Original Post) n2doc Feb 2013 OP
US probably wouldn't lead in science, period HockeyMom Feb 2013 #1
This is important. I believe science equality is essential for general equality. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2013 #2

napoleon_in_rags

(3,991 posts)
2. This is important. I believe science equality is essential for general equality.
Mon Feb 4, 2013, 07:51 PM
Feb 2013

When I was in college, there was a fairly clear culture that had white males in engineering type fields, while more women and people of color were in cultural studies. This is a recipe for financial inequality down the road, because I believe science grads are likely to make more. Its really critical to level that playing field for a more successful county.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Girls Lead in Science Exa...