Science
Related: About this forumIs the Universe Gaining Weight?
It started with a bang, and has been expanding ever since. For nearly a century, this has been the standard view of the Universe. Now one cosmologist is proposing a radically different interpretation of events in which the Universe is not expanding at all.
In a paper posted on the arXiv preprint server1, Christof Wetterich, a theoretical physicist at the University of Heidelberg in Germany, has devised a different cosmology in which the Universe is not expanding but the mass of everything has been increasing. Such an interpretation could help physicists to understand problematic issues such as the so-called singularity present at the Big Bang, he says.
Although the paper has yet to be peer-reviewed, none of the experts contacted by Nature dismissed it as obviously wrong, and some of them found the idea worth pursuing. I think its fascinating to explore this alternative representation, says Hongsheng Zhao, a cosmologist at the University of St Andrews, UK. His treatment seems rigorous enough to be entertained.
Astronomers measure whether objects are moving away from or towards Earth by analysing the light that their atoms emit or absorb, which comes in characteristic colours, or frequencies. When matter is moving away from us, these frequencies appear shifted towards the red, or lower-frequency, part of the spectrum, in the same way that we hear the pitch of an ambulance siren drop as it speeds past.
more
http://www.nature.com/news/cosmologist-claims-universe-may-not-be-expanding-1.13379
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,752 posts)opiate69
(10,129 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)Whether the red shift calculations have compensated adequately for gravitational effects. I find this article interesting.