There's a Mouse Crisis in Scientific Research
BY ALICE ROBB
Are scientists less rigorous about applying proper research standards when their subjects are mice? Thats the question Jennifer Couzin-Frankel investigates in the latest issue of Scienceand her findings are disturbing. According to her paper, When Mice Mislead, scientists working with mice routinely use small sample sizes, select their subjects unsystematically, and even lose track of their data ormost ominously of allleave out results that dont support their research. The problems with extrapolating findings from rodents to humans are well-known, but if the research is sloppy, the links could be even more tenuous than scientists realized.
Ulrich Dirnagl, a researcher in Berlin, told Couzin-Frankel he was reviewing a paper examining rodents response to a new drug to treat strokes when he realized something was off: The study tested 20 micebut only 17 were represented on a graph of the final results. When Dirnagl wrote to the papers editor, he learned that the three missing mice had suffered strokes and died. Rather than dealing with the implications of this for the drug, the researchers decided to drop them out of the study.
"This isn't fraud," says Dirnagl, who often works with mice. Dropping animals from a research study for any number of reasons, he explains, is an entrenched, accepted part of the culture. "You look at your data, there are no rules.
People exclude animals at their whim, they just do it and they don't report it."
That sounds a lot like fraud. Understandably, the scientists Couzin-Frankel interviewed were wary of tarnishing the publics perception of animal researchbut their revelations are worrying nonetheless.
more
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115754/mice-studies-researchers-are-ignoring-deaths