Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 10:29 PM Jan 2015

Chemists Confirm the Existence of New Type of Bond

Chemistry has many laws, one of which is that the rate of a reaction speeds up as temperature rises. So, in 1989, when chemists experimenting at a nuclear accelerator in Vancouver observed that a reaction between bromine and muonium—a hydrogen isotope—slowed down when they increased the temperature, they were flummoxed.

Donald Fleming, a University of British Columbia chemist involved with the experiment, thought that perhaps as bromine and muonium co-mingled, they formed an intermediate structure held together by a “vibrational” bond—a bond that other chemists had posed as a theoretical possibility earlier that decade. In this scenario, the lightweight muonium atom would move rapidly between two heavy bromine atoms, “like a Ping Pong ball bouncing between two bowling balls,” Fleming says. The oscillating atom would briefly hold the two bromine atoms together and reduce the overall energy, and therefore speed, of the reaction. (With a Fleming working on a bond, you could say the atomic interaction is shaken, not stirred.)

At the time of the experiment, the necessary equipment was not available to examine the milliseconds-long reaction closely enough to determine whether such vibrational bonding existed. Over the past 25 years, however, chemists' ability to track subtle changes in energy levels within reactions has greatly improved, so Fleming and his colleagues ran their reaction again three years ago in the nuclear accelerator at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in England. Based on calculations from both experiments and the work of collaborating theoretical chemists at Free University of Berlin and Saitama University in Japan, they concluded that muonium and bromine were indeed forming a new type of temporary bond. Its vibrational nature lowered the total energy of the intermediate bromine-muonium structure—thereby explaining why the reaction slowed even though the temperature was rising.

The team reported its results last December in Angewandte Chemie International Edition, a publication of the German Chemical Society. The work confirms that vibrational bonds—fleeting though they may be—should be added to the list of known chemical bonds. And although the bromine-muonium reaction was an “ideal” system to verify vibrational bonding, Fleming predicts the phenomenon also occurs in other reactions between heavy and light atoms.

more
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chemists-confirm-the-existence-of-new-type-of-bond/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chemists Confirm the Existence of New Type of Bond (Original Post) n2doc Jan 2015 OP
James Bond? shenmue Jan 2015 #1
Good one! n/t JimDandy Jan 2015 #2
Bum da da bum bum, bum bum bum, bum da da bum bum demwing Jan 2015 #3
Flemming? Darb Jan 2015 #5
I'll have that bromine shaken, not stirred. packman Jan 2015 #4
And Rush Limbaugh is fuming about it. Orrex Jan 2015 #6
It is improper for Scientific American to call muonium a "hydrogen isotope".... xocet Jan 2015 #7
People probably think you are being a Pedantic Pete Ratty Jan 2015 #8

xocet

(3,871 posts)
7. It is improper for Scientific American to call muonium a "hydrogen isotope"....
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 01:15 AM
Jan 2015
Chemists Confirm the Existence of New Type of Bond
A “vibrational” chemical bond predicted in the 1980s is demonstrated experimentally

...

So, in 1989, when chemists experimenting at a nuclear accelerator in Vancouver observed that a reaction between bromine and muonium—a hydrogen isotope—slowed down when they increased the temperature, they were flummoxed.

...

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chemists-confirm-the-existence-of-new-type-of-bond/


muonium

Atom-like particle consisting of a positive muon and an electron.

http://goldbook.iupac.org/M04069.html


isotopes

Nuclides having the same atomic number but different mass numbers.

http://goldbook.iupac.org/I03331.html


atomic number, Z
Also contains definition of: proton number

The number of protons in the atomic nucleus.

http://goldbook.iupac.org/A00499.html


mass number, A

Total number of heavy particles (protons and neutrons jointly called nucleons) in the atomic nucleus. Also called nucleon number. Symbol m in mass spectrometry.

http://goldbook.iupac.org/M03726.html


More information on muons:




Why take the route of oversimplification and, thus, misrepresentation?

Ratty

(2,100 posts)
8. People probably think you are being a Pedantic Pete
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 03:05 PM
Jan 2015

Or a Dora Downer but thank you for saying something. When I saw the term "hydrogen isotope" I had to look at the article link to make sure it wasn't RT, Popular Mechanics, or Natural News. Hydrogen isotope is a wildly inaccurate description of muonium. Tsk tsk SciAm. I'm gonna go look at the comments for the article. I'm betting we're not the only ones disappointed.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Chemists Confirm the Exis...