Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 07:47 AM Jul 2015

Starving the space program

http://theweek.com/articles/568003/starving-space-program

Starving the space program
William Falk
July 24, 2015

Success has many fathers; so do successful space missions. NASA has been basking in widespread applause over the past week, after its New Horizons probe completed a 4.67 billion–mile, 10-year journey to Pluto, revealing unexpected wonders in stunning detail. But New Horizons — like so many other proposed space missions — almost didn't happen.

During the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the Bush administration tried to defund the Pluto mission twice. Over many decades, Congress and various presidents have cut NASA's funding from 4.3 percent of the federal budget to 0.5 percent today, severely crimping the agency's ambitions and delaying mankind's explorations of the solar system by decades. I find this sad and small-minded. For $720 million, or the cost of about three F-35 fighter jets, NASA just sent a 12-foot spaceship hurtling to the edge of the solar system at 30,000 mph, swooping to within 7,800 miles of Pluto — exactly as planned. Now New Horizons moves on to the Kuiper Belt, the birthplace of comets. What other government program produces such competence, such awe, such bang for the buck?

Our species is rightly called Homo sapiens: We are the creatures who seek to know. Our ancestors wondered what was beyond the horizon, so they wandered out of Africa and kept going until they covered the globe. Now human beings want to know how it feels to walk on Mars, if there's life in the oceans of Europa and Ganymede, and whether we have company in this unimaginably vast universe. NASA even wants to find out if a killer asteroid is headed this way. In a $3.9 trillion federal budget, surely we can find a few billion more for all that.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
5. If we could get the MIC into supplying NASA
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 10:44 AM
Jul 2015

instead of war toys we might have a space program.

Not enough money for them!

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
6. even the Saturn V was "throw-weight for peace" and the space cadets were always
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 01:19 PM
Jul 2015
the MIC's biggest voices since the 50s even when NASA wasn't Rocketdyne/Douglas/Boeing/NAA's biggest accounts: "our destiny is the stars" was as much composed and massaged as "I want my Maypo"

the ground shifted after Reagan: 1992-5's talk of the "peace dividend" (where ever did that go?) and a new shift in doctrine from bombers and ICBMs allowed mass aerospace-sector layoffs--round 40,000 "rightsized" IIRC, but without much of a drop in the MIC's budget

despite New Horizons actually being the last interplanetary mission slated for--what, nearly a decade?--the GOP's corporatists are still kicking around: they'll still demand more STEM degrees (and increase H1B limits), want the NSF to focus on "hard" sciences (since social is even more dangerous for them), and are okay with NASA programs past LEO (since the last thing they want is more satellites with their sensors turned downwards!)
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Starving the space progra...