Science
Related: About this forumA third of the stars in the Milky Way have dramatically changed orbit
It's easy to think of stars as being fixed in place, because that's how we see them in the sky. But like Earth and the other planets, they have orbits. And it turns out those orbits can change dramatically. In creating a new map of the Milky Way as part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), scientists recently discovered that around 30 percent of the stars in our galaxy have done exactly that they've moved into a totally new orbit.
The scientists came upon this revelation by studying the chemical composition of each star, which is evident in the spectra or the range and intensity of light wavelengths coming from the star with different lines in a spectrograph corresponding to elements and compounds.
"Stellar spectra show us that the chemical makeup of our galaxy is constantly changing," explains New Mexico State University professor Jon Holtzman, who was involved in the study. "Stars create heavier elements in their core, and when the stars die, those heavier elements go back into the gas from which the next stars form."
The amount of heavy elements in each star tells astronomers which part of the galaxy it was born in, like a stellar fossil record. But data from the SDSS Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Explorer (APOGEE) spectrograph, which studied 100,000 stars during a four-year period, suggests that as many as 30 percent of stars have moved far from their birthplace.
http://www.gizmag.com/sdss-apogee-stars-milky-way-change-orbit/38718/
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,405 posts)Thanks for the thread, Ichingcarpenter.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)If not, it implies our simulations have some room for improvement.
Igel
(35,350 posts)Depends on what "this" is.
The "30%" number? I don't think that was simulated. In fact, I think that's the point: What caused that number? Oh, gee, perhaps interaction with dwarf galaxies? Or perhaps mostly just random stellar interactions? That'll be a nice way to gauge the accuracy of the models.
It's been noted, perhaps a decade back, that the Sun has some siblings. They're scattered around a bit but identifiably siblings, and that tells us something about the history of our own average star. For example, if you have a few of them you can start backtracking ... to find out where, relative to a common, fixed reference point, our own little star was born.
From that, you can start looking around for supernova remnants that might be "daddy" to our nebular "mommy."