Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumNASA has figured out how to cause a supernova
NASA, for some reason that the agency has chosen not to share, is quite interested in just exactly what it takes to set off a Type Ia supernova. Thanks to a series of X-ray and ultraviolet observations from the SWIFT satellite, NASA says that "we have a clearer picture of what's required to blow up these stars." Oh, good.
Type Ia supernovae are a specific type of stellar explosion that are very, very important because astronomers can use them as what's called "standard candles."
Standard candles (there are only a few different kinds and they're all very rare) are things that we can see with a telescope and know how far away they are. Usually, if you see something through a telescope, there's no reliable way of knowing whether it's a bright thing that's far away or a dim thing that's up close. A standard candle has a luminosity (or, an intrinsic brightness) that doesn't ever change, so based on how bright or dim it looks to us here on Earth, we can figure out how far away it (and everything around it) actually is.
With Type Ia supernovae, the standard candle is a white dwarf star that blows up. We know a fair amount about white dwarfs themselves: they're main-sequence stars (like our sun) that have used up all of their fuel and collapsed into a white blob about the size of the Earth, glowing thanks to stored-up leftover heat. Made up mostly of carbon and oxygen, white dwarfs can't undergo fusion on their own, so they just sit there and slowly cool off until eventually they stop putting out any light at all.
Sometimes, though, a white dwarf will have a companion star, as part of a binary system. And though the white dwarf is very small for a star, it still has star-like gravity, and it'll start sucking up material from its companion.
more
http://dvice.com/archives/2012/03/nasa-has-figure.php
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2454 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NASA has figured out how to cause a supernova (Original Post)
n2doc
Mar 2012
OP
"for some reason ..." like wanting to know if it's likely to happen nearby ?
eppur_se_muova
Mar 2012
#3
Mz Pip
(27,454 posts)1. NASA figured out what to do
but they really don't know how to do it. It might be hard to actually move a white dwarf to the right location of the star we would want to blow up. Details, details.
Silent3
(15,393 posts)2. The last attempt to bomb the moon failed to get rid of the damned thing
We have to try something with a bit more bang. If we take out the Earth at the same time, so be it. The moon has got to go.
eppur_se_muova
(36,305 posts)3. "for some reason ..." like wanting to know if it's likely to happen nearby ?
I don't think we want a supernova within a hundred light-years of Earth anytime soon. If we know it's going to happen, all of humanity will have one and only one goal for the forseeable future: move.
There are a few stars lately that have really been pissing me off.
They won't be so uppity NOW!
Orsino
(37,428 posts)5. Daring the Republicans to cut their budget again. n/t
lastlib
(23,336 posts)6. So what exactly does this have to do with Whitney Houston?
fightforfreedom123
(87 posts)7. Then this must not be far behind
Time Travel and Black Holes.
BadgerKid
(4,559 posts)8. Shhhhh....it's the Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator. n/t