Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 08:59 AM Nov 2015

U.S. Space Mining Law Is Potentially Dangerous And Illegal:

U.S. Space Mining Law Is Potentially Dangerous And Illegal: How Asteroid Mining Act May Violate International Treaty



US companies like it but


But some lawyers and experts voiced potential conflict between the Act and the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, which declares points such as “states shall avoid harmful contamination of space and celestial bodies,” and that celestial bodies and outer space in general are “not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.”

Planetary Resources President and Chief Engineer Chris Lewicki himself said a number of investors expressed concerns about the issue.

Professor Ram Jakhu from the Institute of Air and Space Law at McGill University thought of the U.S. Space Act as directly violating the treaty, as it allows states, private firms, or international organizations to appropriate natural space resources.

Dr. Gbenga Oduntan of University of Kent, an international commercial law expert, said that it can be assumed that the list of states with access to outer space will grow from the current dozen or so, and institute their own space mining programs.

“That means that the pristine conditions of the cradle of nature from which our own Earth was born may become irrevocably altered forever - making it harder to trace how we came into being,” he wrote, warning that once celestial bodies are contaminated with earthly microbes, humans’ chances of discovering alien life could be ruined.

Dr. Oduntan added that space mining could also potentially damage the environment surrounding Earth and eventually result in resource-centered conflict.


more

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/111534/20151128/u-s-space-mining-law-is-potentially-dangerous-and-illegal-how-asteroid-mining-act-may-violate-international-treaty.htm
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Space Mining Law Is Potentially Dangerous And Illegal: (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Nov 2015 OP
wow, so basically whoever gets there gets the stuff nashville_brook Nov 2015 #1
...and leaves the crap for other people/species to deal with! lastlib Nov 2015 #2
we'd have to mine for a long, long, long time qazplm Nov 2015 #3
'' For the benefit for all mankind'' Ichingcarpenter Nov 2015 #4
Apparently, your initial assumption is that a given "hunk of rock" is "lifeless".... xocet Nov 2015 #5

lastlib

(23,251 posts)
2. ...and leaves the crap for other people/species to deal with!
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 11:30 AM
Nov 2015

No--it WON'T end well. I thought it would run afoul of the '67 Treaty.

qazplm

(3,626 posts)
3. we'd have to mine for a long, long, long time
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 12:19 PM
Nov 2015

to get rid of all the primordial stuff floating out there to "trace how we came into being."

Second, I don't think/understand how "contaminating" a lifeless hunk of rock with microbes is a bad thing. Should we not expand to Mars because we might "contaminate" that planet?

Expand or die humanity, we can't stay on Earth forever.

Yes I know, some of you actively look forward to humanity dying out, but the rest of us, resources are going to be necessary and the planet we are on now does not contain an infinite stock of them.

If you think conflict comes from resources, then what do you think comes from a lack of resources?

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
4. '' For the benefit for all mankind''
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 12:25 PM
Nov 2015

Remember that plaque on the moon? It doesn't say private corporations.
Its say for all of mankind.

This should be ''an earth' thing and not shareholders, sure develop it
but the bill doesn't give that Its like the international banksters running things.

xocet

(3,871 posts)
5. Apparently, your initial assumption is that a given "hunk of rock" is "lifeless"....
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 08:25 PM
Nov 2015

If that is your initial assumption, that is the problem with your thinking and understanding.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»U.S. Space Mining Law Is ...