Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:14 AM Feb 2016

‘Britain’s Atlantis’ sank into the sea due to climate change

February 21, 2016

‘Britain’s Atlantis’ sank into the sea due to climate change

by Susanna Pilny


Researchers have found proof that Dunwich, England—otherwise known as “Britain’s Atlantis”—sank thanks to a series of storms that came with the advent of the Little Ice Age. (Not to be confused with the newly-discovered Late Antique Little Ice Age that helped bring about the downfall of the eastern Roman Empire.)

According to historical records, the port city of Dunwich—which was the 10th largest town in 11th century England, nearly comparable in size to 14th century London—was pummeled by multiple storms in the 13th and 14th centuries.

"They were like the south coast storms of 2013-14, at least once a year for decades," Professor David Sear, of the University of Southampton, told BBC.

Eventually, these storms ruined Dunwich’s harbor to the point that locals gave up trying to use it—and then swallowed the majority of the town under the sea, leaving it roughly 11 to 33 feet (3 to 10 meters) below the surface. It is now the world’s largest medieval underwater site.

Archaeologists have spent the last three years exploring Dunwich underwater, thanks to a $1.3 million (£900,000) grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund, and already have made some marvelous discoveries using advanced underwater imaging techniques—including the watery remains of eight churches, what is thought to be a tollhouse, and an encircling defensive earthwork which appears to date back to the Iron Age (roughly between 800 BCE to 100 CE).

Read more at http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1113412709/real-atlantis-of-britain-sunk-into-the-sea-due-to-climate-change-022116/#mAlsqKeE0P5HA1oL.99

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
1. Oh, I thought the article would be about Doggerland.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:07 AM
Feb 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doggerland

(Stephen Baxter wrote an Alternative-History novel, "Stone Spring", about what history would have gone like if the inhabitants had protected Doggerland against climate-change and rising seas with dykes.)

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
3. Dunwich isn't that far from where the last bit of land connecting Britain to continental Europe was
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:42 AM
Feb 2016


http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=647500&Y=270500&A=Y&Z=150


The shallowest part of the North Sea is that arc from the north of Norfolk, over to the Dutch islands. Dunwich is a little south of that - roughly level with the 's' in 'Metres' on the depth chart..
 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
4. In a way it is. That coastline continus to retreat
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:54 AM
Feb 2016

in continuation of the Doggerland inundation process.





The rate of erosion and inundation will now increase.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
6. It's a pet theory of mine that English was originally the language of Doggerland
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:11 PM
Feb 2016

There's a certain amount of evidence that the tribes of southeast England spoke an ancestral form of English even before the Romans arrived -- while Celtic languages were limited to the Cornwall, Wales, Scotland, and a bit of western England.

Partly this has to do with river names, which are typically retained even when new peoples arrive and which in England appear Germanic rather than Celtic. And partly it's that the closest relative of modern English is Frisian -- which is spoken along the Dutch coast in an area just the other side of where Doggerland was formerly -- while the languages of the Angles and Saxons who invaded England in the fifth and sixth centuries were quite a bit more remote.

In fact, English is so distant from other Germanic languages that it's sometimes described as a fourth branch of that family. The differences are far greater than those between French, Italian, and Spanish, which started to diverge at the time of the fall of the Roman empire.

Of course, this requires assuming that the Indo-European languages were already present in western Europe at the time of Doggerland -- which isn't a mainstream position, but which again has a certain amount of evidence (like those ancient river names) to back it up.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»‘Britain’s Atlantis’ sank...