Science
Related: About this forumESA: Mars lander crash caused by 1-second inertial measurement error
Source: SpaceNews.com
ESA: Mars lander crash caused by 1-second inertial measurement error
by Peter B. de Selding November 23, 2016
PARIS The European Space Agency on Nov. 23 said its Schiaparelli landers crash landing on Mars on Oct. 19 followed an unexplained saturation of its inertial measurement unit, which delivered bad data to the landers computer and forced a premature release of its parachute.
Polluted by the IMU data, the landers computer apparently thought it had either already landed or was just about to land. The parachute system was released, the braking thrusters were fired only briefly and the on-ground systems were activated.
Instead of being on the ground, Schiaparelli was still 3.7 kilometers above the Mars surface. It crashed, but not before delivering what ESA officials say is a wealth of data on entry into the Mars atmosphere, the functioning and release of the heat shield and the deployment of the parachute all of which went according to plan.
Awaiting a December go-ahead for ExoMars 2020
Schiaparelli was never intended to survive more than a few days on the Mars surface, but the the crash-and-die scenario has nonetheless made for bad press in Europe, raising concern that ESA governments might struggle to find the 300 million euros ($330 million) needed to finish funding a 2020 mission with Russia.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://spacenews.com/esa-mars-lander-crash-caused-by-1-second-inertial-measurement-error/
___________________________________________________________________________
Source: Gizmodo
A Crazy Miscalculation Doomed the Schiaparelli Lander
George Dvorsky
Today 3:19pmFiled to: MARS
The European Space Agency has released new information about the crash of the ExoMars Schiaparelli lander. Soon after the deployment of its parachute, the lander made a miscalculation so bad that it thought it was below the Martian surface, when in reality was still two miles high.
The ESAs investigation into the crash is far from over, but this latest revelation is painting a clearer picture of what happened during the failed landing on October 19.
Schiaparelli deployed its parachute normally at an altitude of 7.5 miles (12 km) and at a speed of 1,075 miles per hour (1,730 km/h). As planned, the vehicles heat shield was ejected when it reached an altitude of 4.85 miles (7.8 km). But things went to complete shit from there.
As it was making its slow descent, Schiaparellis Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) went about its business of calculating the landers rotation rate. For some reason, the IMU calculated a saturation-maximum period that persisted for one second longer than what would normally be expected at this stage. When the IMU sent this bogus information to the crafts navigation system, it calculated a negative altitude. In other words, it thought the lander was below ground level. Ouch.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://gizmodo.com/a-crazy-miscalculation-doomed-the-sciaparelli-lander-1789319670
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The fact that we managed to land a 1 ton rover on there via a rocket-powered skycrane is a testament to the fucking mad skills at JPL.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)I stayed up to watch the coverage that night. They were rightfully jubilant in Mission Control when the first of Curiosity's many selfies arrived shortly after the landing:
En route, a tourist snap from HiRISE: