Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dead_Parrot

(14,478 posts)
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 10:30 PM Apr 2012

Light Bends by Itself

OK, now my brain hurts.

Any physics student knows that light travels in a straight line. But now researchers have shown that light can also travel in a curve, without any external influence. The effect is actually an optical illusion, although the researchers say it could have practical uses such as moving objects with light from afar.

It's well known that light bends. When light rays pass from air into water, for instance, they take a sharp turn; that's why a stick dipped in a pond appears to tilt toward the surface. Out in space, light rays passing near very massive objects such as stars are seen to travel in curves. In each instance, light-bending has an external cause: For water, it is a change in an optical property called the refractive index, and for stars, it is the warping nature of gravity.

For light to bend by itself, however, is unheard of—almost. In the late 1970s, physicists Michael Berry at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom, and Nandor Balazs of the State University of New York, Stony Brook, discovered that a so-called Airy waveform, a wave describing how quantum particles move, can sometimes bend by a small amount. That work was largely ignored until 2007, when Demetri Christodoulides and other physicists at the University of Central Florida in Orlando generated optical versions of Airy waves by manipulating laser light, and found that the resultant beam curved slightly as it crossed a detector.

How did this self-bending work? Light is a jumble of waves, and their peaks and troughs can interfere with one another. For example, a peak passing a trough cancels each other out to create darkness; a peak passing another peak "interferes constructively" to create a bright spot. Now, imagine light emitted from a wide strip—perhaps a fluorescent tube or, better, a laser whose output has been expanded. By carefully controlling the initial position of the wave peaks—the phase of the waves—at every step along the strip, it is possible to make the light traveling outward interfere constructively at only points on a curve and cancel out everywhere else. The Airy function, which contains rapid but diminishing oscillations, proved an easy way to define those initial phases—except that the resultant light would bend only up to about 8°.


More: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/04/light-bends-by-itself.html
Paper1 (Sub): http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/upcoming_pdf.cfm?id=161557
Paper2 (Sub): http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v108/i16/e163901

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
1. Light isn't "a jumble of waves."
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 11:29 PM
Apr 2012

Light is particles and the "jumble of waves" is a probalistic distribution of where a photon may be found at any given time, not a collection of physical waves.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
5. Photons are still particles.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 04:12 AM
Apr 2012

Particles can interfere with themselves. That's why when the double-slit experiment is performed with other, larger particles, the same interference pattern emerges over time. IIRC, the result has been reproduced with fullerenes, which are definitely NOT waves.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
8. They're particles that exhibit wavelike properties.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 02:52 PM
Apr 2012

Those wavelike properties aren't the result of being waves; they're the result of (for lack of a better term) quantum weirdness.

The wavelike properties that photons exhibit are the same as the wavelike properties that electrons, nucleons, atoms, and even small molecules exhibit and are related to a system's wavefunction, not being a physical wave.

Photons have never been detected as waves and the theory which explains their behavior, quantum electrodynamics, explains them as particles.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
10. There's a difference.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:06 PM
Apr 2012

The wavefunction and wavelike properties of photons and other particles aren't the result of physical waves.

Photons are particles that exhibit wavelike properties, not wave-particles.

An analogy would be a cat that acts like a dog--it would be a cat that exhibits dog like properties, not a cat-dog.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
11. See my previous response. You're still just wanting to use a different term.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:23 PM
Apr 2012

Fact is quantum particles aren't like anything at the macro level. They're not waves, they're not particles, they're quantum goo.

Photons aren't particles because particles don't have wavefunctions or wavelike properties. So they need a new name, since neither "wave" nor "particle" will do. Physicists settled on wave-particle long ago, but they are not saying it's a particle, nor are they saying it's a wave. It's something else, and they just jammed the two names together to describe that something else.

You don't consider protons professional and heavy. So there's no need to consider wave-particles waves or particles.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
12. There's a problem with your argument.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:37 PM
Apr 2012

The double-slit experiment has been performed with buckyballs, which are physical, tangible objects.

They diffracted.

Bose-Einstein condensates also demonstrate the wavelike properties of physical objects (atoms).

It's true that classical particles don't have obvious wavefunctions or wavelike properties, but classical mechanics is an incomplete approximation. That's why quantum mechanics had to be developed--at the atomic scale and smaller, particles no longer behave as their classical counterparts. That doesn't mean they aren't particles, but that they don't behave as classical particles.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
13. Photons are physical, tangible objects.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:54 PM
Apr 2012

So are electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks, and all the rest that makes up the quantum world.

That doesn't mean they aren't particles, but that they don't behave as classical particles.

This argument works for the exact opposite position. "That doesn't mean they aren't waves. But they don't behave as classic waves."

Besides, you yourself concede that they aren't particles when you invented the term "classic particles".

You are arguing that a term chosen 80 years ago displeases you. That's nice, but it's like finding the word "neutron" displeasing. Not liking it doesn't make it wrong.


 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
14. Quantum mechanics is the physics of particle interactions.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:39 PM
Apr 2012

QED is about the interactions of particles of light (photons) and particles of matter (electrons)

QCD is about the interactions of particles of particles of matter (quarks) and particles of the strong force (gluons).

And so on.

The wavelike properties of matter have to do with probability amplitudes, not physical waves.

When a wave-particle duality is being talked about, it isn't about bosons, mesons, fermions, etc. being both particle and wave, it's about them being particles that exhibit a character analogous to waves in certain circumstances.

I'm not sure how to explain this any more clearly. A photon isn't both particle and wave, it's a particle that sometimes behaves as if it were a wave. A particle's wavelike character isn't the result of a physical wave but probability amplitudes--the wavefunction is about where the particle might be found at any given time.

Dead_Parrot

(14,478 posts)
15. Also, they are still waves
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 07:33 PM
Apr 2012

They got wavelength, polarization and propagation speed. I rather suspect it comes down to the definition of 'wave' - you seem happy to consider physical and probability waves as 'real' waves, but not electromagnetic/de Broglie waves (e.g. for the interfering C60, ? ? 2.5pm).

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
16. The reason I say that photons are particles that exhibit wavelike behavior rather than
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 08:37 PM
Apr 2012

saying that they are both waves and particles is because they have been shown rather conclusively to be particles that have some wavelike aspects and not the converse.

The most accurate and complete description of how light behaves has light as particles and light is only detected as particles.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
2. Now "making light self-bend through any angle, even through a complete circle"
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 11:47 PM
Apr 2012

You left out the new stuff:

Now physicists Mordechai Segev and colleagues at Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, in Haifa say they have a recipe for making light self-bend through any angle, even through a complete circle. The problem with the Airy function, says Segev, is that the shape of its oscillations specify the right phases only at small angles; at angles much greater than 8°, the shape becomes a crude approximation. So his group turned to Maxwell's equations, the 150-year-old quartet of mathematical formulas that describe the propagation of electromagnetic waves such as light. After laborious mathematics and guesswork, the researchers found solutions to Maxwell's equations that precisely describe the initial phases required for truly self-bending light, as they report this week in Physical Review Letters.

<snip>

The work of Segev's group might have remained theoretical, but by coincidence, a group led by John Dudley at the University of Franche-Comté in Besançon, France, has been performing its own experiments on self-bending light. By modifying the existing Airy function, Dudley's group managed to find initial phase values that match the Israeli group's solution, even though they were unaware of it. Using a device called a spatial light modulator to pre-adjust the phase of an expanded beam of laser light, the French group found that the resultant light self-bent by up to 60°, as it will report later this month in Optics Letters.

<snip>


Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Light Bends by Itself