Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(33,534 posts)
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 11:33 AM Jan 2019

Polymers of Cerium and Plutonium.

The paper I'll discuss in this post is this one: Monomers, Dimers, and Helices: Complexities of Cerium and Plutonium Phenanthrolinecarboxylates (Albrecht-Schmitt*† et al Inorg. Chem., 2016, 55 (9), pp 4373–4380)

Recently in this space, I discussed, based on my knowledge of plutonium chemistry, that polymers of cerium also exist, since cerium is often utilized in the lab as a plutonium analogue: Cerium Requirements to Split One Billion Tons of Carbon Dioxide, the Nuclear v Solar Thermal cases.

As the year wound down, I decided to burn up the remaining unused "free" literature downloads connected with my ACS membership - we get 50 free papers per year with our membership - since all the major libraries were closed for the holidays. My search term was to search for recent papers in ACS journals with "plutonium" in the title.

And low and behold, I came across a paper on cerium polymers investigated along with plutonium polymers, a paper focusing on the validity of the "close analogue" association connected with the two elements.

From the introduction:

Cerium provides a useful, nonradioactive analogue of plutonium owing to their similar ionic radii when in the 4+ oxidation state, and as a result, several families of coordination complexes and materials form isomorphous series.(1-4) Examples of this include a variety of phosphonates such as M[C6H4(PO3H)(PO3H2)][C6H4(PO3H)(PO3)]3·2H2O (M = Ce, Pu),(5, 6) the cationic framework tellurites, [M2Te4O11]Cl2 (M = Ce, Pu),(7) and a large collection of sulfates.(8) However, there are notable deviations in the oxidation state, reactivity, and coordination chemistry between cerium and plutonium, as documented in the PuIV maltol complex, Pu(C6H5O3)4,(9) the mixed-valent molybdate, CsPu3Mo6O24(H2O),(10) and the hydroxypyridonate, Pu{5LIO(Me-3,2-HOPO)}2.(2) In Pu(C6H5O3)4 and Pu{5LIO(Me-3,2-HOPO)}2, the differences are subtle and lie in divergence in the point symmetry of the local coordination environments without a change in the coordination number.(2, 9)...

...To further understand the convergence and divergence in the reaction chemistry between cerium and plutonium complexes and better characterize the viability of using CeIV as a nonreactive analogue of PuIV, the mixed N- and O-donor 1,10-phenanthroline-2,9-dicarboxylic acid (PDA) was chosen as a complexant. The tetradentate PDA ligand is exceptionally suited for comparative studies with f elements. For example, many lanthanide- and actinide-containing PDA complexes have been prepared that demonstrate the ability of PDA to provide a suitable coordination environment for large, trivalent, oxophilic ions.(16-22) PDA has also provided a platform to interrogate f-element electronic structure and bonding in EuIII and TbIII complexes through sensitization studies of EuIII luminescence(18) and to evaluate the differences in the thermodynamics of complexation with the early actinides ThIV,(19) UVI,(19) and NpV.(20) This ligand is additionally attractive given that it, as well as its derivatives, are being investigated for use in the separation of americium and curium from lanthanides in advanced nuclear fuel cycles.


Apparently the plutonium in the complexes is in the +4 oxidation state, also accessible to cerium:

Synthesis
The complexity of the redox chemistry of plutonium is unparalleled by any other element. This makes the oxidation state assignment challenging, particularly from visual coloration alone. There are, for instance, blue compounds containing PuIV,(24, 25) although this color is normally indicative of PuIII. Likewise, PuIV complexes yield a variety of colors, with red and green being most common.(4-6) Mixtures of oxidation states are more common than not for plutonium in solution but quite rare in the solid state because crystallization is always under solubility control and may or may not reflect the dominant species in solution.(26, 27) Fortunately, the fingerprint spectra of intra-f transitions for plutonium in different oxidation states have been well established for decades, and identification of the formal charge from electronic absorption spectra is relatively straightforward, particularly in solids.(4-6) The reaction of PuIII with PDA results in the formation of a solid with a golden color that is not clearly indicative of any particular oxidation state. However, both the absorption spectrum and structural data are consistent with PuIV (vide infra), and the compound has the straightforward formulation of 3.
.

Plutonium is, by the way, unparalleled by any other element and in my less than humble opinion, is the key element for saving the world, despite a lot of tripe about how unacceptably "dangerous" it is.

A photograph of crystals of plutonium and cerium complexes described in this paper:



The caption:

Figure 1. Photographs of single crystals of (a) 1, (b) 2, and (c) 3.


"3" is the plutonium PDA complex, Pu(PDA)2 the other two are cerium complexes. (PDA = 1,10-phenanthroline-2,9-dicarboxylic acid)

Some other graphics from the text:



The caption:

Figure 2. View of a portion of the 1D chain in 1 formed via linking of the CeIII centers by carboxylate moieties. The local coordination environment around the cerium centers is formed via chelation by the tetradentate PDA2– anions, two water molecules, and a chloride anion. The ninth site is occupied by the oxygen atom from a carboxylate group of a crystallographically equivalent [Ce(PDA)(H2O)2Cl] structural building unit.




The caption:

Figure 3. Depictions of the two distinct substructures in 2. (a) View of helical [Ce(PDAH)(PDA)]1? chains formed via the bridging of [Ce(PDAH)(PDA)] units by carboxylate groups. (b) Illustration of dimers created from [Ce(PDAH)(PDA)] monomers that are again linked by carboxylate moieties. The CeIII centers are 9-coordinate within the dimers and 10-coordinate within the chains.




The caption:

Figure 4. View of the molecular structure 3 formed via the chelation of a PuIV cation by two tetradentate PDA2– anions, creating an 8-coordinate, cross-shaped geometry where the PDA2– ligands are roughly orthogonal to each other. These molecule form short ?···? contacts with an intermolecular distance of 3.285(4) Å.


In their discussion the authors show that the assumption of identity in the chemistry of cerium and plutonium often does not hold. Here is the UV/Vis spectra of the analogues:



The caption:

Figure 5. Absorption spectrum acquired from a single crystal of 3 showing characteristic f–f transitions indicative of PuIV.




The caption:

Figure 6. Absorption spectrum acquired from a single crystal of 2. The intense transition at ca. 400 nm is a combination MLCT and IVCT transitions (i.e., ?–?*) of the PDAHx ligands.




The caption:

Figure 7. Absorption spectrum measured from a single crystal of 1.


Some magnetic and thermal properties:



The caption:

Figure 10. Summary of the magnetic properties and heat capacity for 2 showing behavior that is consistent with that of an insulating trivalent cerium compound. (a) Inverse magnet susceptibility ?–1 = (M/H)?1 versus temperature T collected in a magnetic field H = 5 kOe. (b) Magnetization M versus H at T = 2 K. (c) Heat capacity divided by temperature C/T versus T. (d) C/T versus T2 for low T.


The conclusion of the paper:

The challenges, both real and perceived, in working with radioactive elements like plutonium necessitate the use of less nonradioactive analogues for a variety of reasons. Among the acceptable reasons for conducting chemistry with analogues of radionuclides is actually to discern differences between elements that share common physicochemical features. Cerium and plutonium both possess stable 3+ oxidation states, and both can be oxidized to 4+. CeIV and PuIV have negligibly different ionic radii, and their structural chemistry can be quite similar (vide supra). Normally, if differences occur, the plutonium system is more complex because plutonium undergoes more facile redox chemistry than cerium and readily oxidizes to states well beyond 4+. While PuIII does oxidize to PuIV when complexed by PDA, this results in a simple, molecular bis-chelate, 3, where both the structure and oxidation state assignment are straightforward. In contrast, CeIII does not undergo oxidation under these conditions, but the large size of the CeIII ion relative to PuIV results in increased coordination numbers that yield complex dimeric and polymeric structures. In addition, MLCT in the cerium compounds creates intricacies that required both extensive spectroscopic and physical property interrogation to remove ambiguity in the oxidation state assignment. These results add to the growing body of knowledge that indicates that, while analogues of radionuclides are useful guides, they should not be treated as true surrogates, particularly with plutonium.


This may all seem very esoteric, and in my previous post I argued that cerium based carbon dioxide splitting can never address the bulk of the climate change problem should future generations need to clean up our mess to simply survive, but I personally believe that thermochemical splitting can participate in the clean up.

The existence of cerium polymers, particularly as organics that can be grafted easily onto supports may serve in greatly improving the mass efficiency of cerium for this purpose, should it ever become feasible to so use cerium.

I wish you the happiest and healthiest New Year.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Polymers of Cerium and Plutonium. (Original Post) NNadir Jan 2019 OP
Which Pu isotope?? ROB-ROX Jan 2019 #1
Three of the authors are from Los Alamos. The plutonium isotopic mixture... NNadir Jan 2019 #2

ROB-ROX

(767 posts)
1. Which Pu isotope??
Wed Jan 2, 2019, 12:04 AM
Jan 2019

The decay of Pu may have an affect with the polymer? Selecting a more stable isotope like Pu - 239 versus Pu - 242 would be interesting. The University of California has an interesting nuclear chemistry group at LLL(Lawrence Livermore Lab), LBL(Lawrence Berkeley Lab), and LAL (Los Alamos Lab)

NNadir

(33,534 posts)
2. Three of the authors are from Los Alamos. The plutonium isotopic mixture...
Wed Jan 2, 2019, 01:09 AM
Jan 2019

...is quite near bomb grade, 94% 239Pu, 6% 240Pu, described in the paper thusly:

...Material Type 52 in the form of PuO2 was used as received from Los Alamos National Laboratory.


I'd guess that this plutonium may have been rejected for the synthesis of nuclear weapons on a quality control basis, but I'm not sure of that.

It would be better of course, to be less complicated with radiation effects to do this work with mature plutonium that was highly enriched in 242Pu, although I would think that the largest inventory of this type of material is probably in France. In saying this, I am assuming that the French have reprocessed twice through Pu from used MOX fuel. It would need to have decayed long enough to minimize the presence of Pu-241, which probably doesn't survive all that well in MOX in any case.

I assume that the synthetic experiments in this paper were performed at Los Alamos since the experimental section includes the following text:

Caution! 239Pu (t1/2 = 24065 years) and 240Pu (t1/2 = 6537 years) represent serious health risks, owing to their ? emission as well as the radiotoxicity associated with their ?-, ?-, and ?-emitting daughters. All studies with plutonium were conducted in a laboratory dedicated to studies on transuranium elements. This laboratory is located in a nuclear science facility and is equipped with HEPA-filtered hoods and gloveboxes. A series of instruments continually monitor radiation levels in the laboratory. All experiments were carried out with approved safety operating procedures. All free-flowing plutonium solids are handled in negative pressure gloveboxes,


Other labs, with the exception of that at Stanford, are clearly analytical labs, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, Florida and George L. Clark X-ray Facility & 3M Materials Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Berkeley was Glenn Seaborg's "home" institution, and to my knowledge still has one of the best radiochemical labs and nuclear engineering departments in the country, despite the fact that the state as a whole is an anti-nuke hellhole that apparently would rather burn from excess dangerous fossil fuel waste than get serious about climate change and "re-embrace" nuclear energy.

It's kind of tragic actually, shitting on Seaborg's legacy in California, and definitely recalls the horrible situation in Germany, another gas dependent anti-nuke hellhole, where a leading actinide/nuclear chemistry facility is at Karlsruhe.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Polymers of Cerium and Pl...