Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumTheorists calculate upper limit for possible quantization of time
From phys.org:
A trio of theoretical physicists at the Pennsylvania State University has calculated the upper limit for the possible quantization of timethey suggest 10??33 seconds as the upper limit for the period of a universal oscillator. In their paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters, Garrett Wendel, Luis Martínez and Martin Bojowald outline their theory and suggest a possible way to prove it.
For many years, theoretical physicists have been trying to explain a major problemthe general theory of relativity suggests that time is a continuous quantity, one that can move slower or faster depending on acceleration and gravity conditions. But quantum mechanics theories suggest that time ticks away at a steady pace, like the frames of a movie being played out. In this scenario, time must be universal. For both theories to be right, this contradiction must be explained in a rational way.
Some theorists have suggested that one possible explanation for the apparent discrepancy is that time can be quantized as spacetime, similar to theories describing quantum gravity. In such a scenario, spacetime is not described as continuous, but is instead divided into smaller units, which would by necessity have to correspond to the Planck length. This is ,of course, far too small to be detectable. The theory would also require that such discrete packets of time would each expire. This scenario suggests there would need to be a universal clock that ticks away at a very small unit of time. And under this scenario, universal time would exist throughout the universe and also interact with matter. It also raises the question of how fast would such a clock tick.
In this new effort, the theorists have developed a theory to describe the upper limit of such an increment. In their model, they suggest that a universal clock would be a quantum oscillator that regularly switches between two states. To calculate its pace, they envisioned it as being coupled with a slower oscillator similar to an atomic clock. In their model, they envisioned the net energy of the two oscillators as always being the same. In this scenario, the two oscillations would have to desynchronize over time. And the theorists used that divergence as a way to calculate the upper limit for the tick of the universal clock. They even suggest that despite an inability to measure such a short tick, it should be possible to verify their theory by instead attempting to measure the desynchronization of the two oscillations.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1076 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Theorists calculate upper limit for possible quantization of time (Original Post)
Jim__
Jun 2020
OP
This also sets the lower limit for the time required for a bad check to reach the bank. nt
eppur_se_muova
Jun 2020
#3
HelpImSurrounded
(441 posts)1. This book has a very unsatisfying ending.
"it should be possible to verify their theory by instead attempting to measure the desynchronization of the two oscillations."
A cliffhanger? Really?
I want this process explained!!
Bayard
(22,128 posts)2. Bring on Quantum Leap!
eppur_se_muova
(36,281 posts)3. This also sets the lower limit for the time required for a bad check to reach the bank. nt
GeorgeGist
(25,322 posts)4. What's the frequency?
Jim__
(14,083 posts)5. For the universal oscillator?
Last edited Fri Jun 26, 2020, 07:05 PM - Edit history (1)
They suggest 10??33 seconds as the upper limit for the period so I believe that would make 10?33 the lower limit for the frequency.
Duppers
(28,125 posts)6. Interesting
Passing it onto resident physicist.