Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does radiation really make successive generations of animals/plants bigger? (Original Post) raccoon Jun 2012 OP
Something you thought about while staring at the ceiling ? Trajan Jun 2012 #1
No, not true, although it can seem like that. TheWraith Jun 2012 #2
Well... sort of kinda not really? Scootaloo Jun 2012 #3
Stop mistaking the binoculars for your glasses. nt Javaman Jun 2012 #4
 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
1. Something you thought about while staring at the ceiling ?
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 12:48 PM
Jun 2012

What is only slightly lamer than you posting this featherweight reverie is my actually responding to it ....

I feel dirty ....

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
2. No, not true, although it can seem like that.
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:18 PM
Jun 2012

Some areas which are sealed off from humans due to radiological threats, like the Zone of Alienation around Chernobyl, have become home to burgeoning plant and animal populations including near record size wolves and feral hogs. But that's only indirectly due to radiation: the radiation keeps humans away, allowing the wildlife to thrive.

Edited to add: You can see a very similar principle in effect in other no-go zones for humans, like the Demilitarized Zone between North and South Korea. 1,000,000 landmines tell humans to keep out, but the wildlife just keeps on growing. Although to less of an extent than the Zone of Alienation, because animals aren't immune to landmines.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
3. Well... sort of kinda not really?
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:20 PM
Jun 2012

The wildlife in Chernobyl's exclusion zone is considered "larger than average" for instance. This is probably due to twenty years of nature's general law of "biggest breeds best" being unchallenged by humans. However since the lack of humans is due to the radiation, ine could perhaps say...

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Does radiation really mak...