Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SarahD

(1,247 posts)
Mon Jan 15, 2024, 09:31 PM Jan 2024

Making me nervous.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/15/world/peregrine-moon-lander-failure-nasa-scn/index.html

Not sure why we are going back to the moon, now that we know it's not made of cheese, but put that aside and accept that we're gonna do it. I'm worried because the technical advances of the last 50 years don't seem to be making things run smoothly. Seems to me our experiences added to techno advances would make this easy peezy, but problems still abound. We're going to send real actual humans up there, and their future looks kinda shaky.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Making me nervous. (Original Post) SarahD Jan 2024 OP
Humans need to explore the unknown. We will get there eventually Walleye Jan 2024 #1
A ginormous... 2naSalit Jan 2024 #2
From NPR: NASA is set to return to the moon. Here are 4 reasons to go back Jim__ Jan 2024 #3

Jim__

(14,083 posts)
3. From NPR: NASA is set to return to the moon. Here are 4 reasons to go back
Tue Jan 16, 2024, 11:07 AM
Jan 2024

NPR's article is here

Why are they having problems landing on the moon when they were able to do it over 50 years ago? From the article:

It's easier to set down a spacecraft near the moon's equator, so that's where all six Apollo landings occurred. But now, NASA has more ambitious aims.

In August, just ahead of the first launch attempt, NASA announced 13 possible landing sites, each in the south pole region, where water ice has been confirmed deep inside craters that never see sunlight. A crewed lunar flyby, Artemis II, is anticipated for 2024. And the first crewed landing, Artemis III, could come as early as 2025.


Why land near the south pole? Again, from the article:

The sites "are some of the best places to go for lunar geology and understanding lunar ice and sampling lunar ice," says Bethany Ehlmann, associate director of the Keck Institute for Space Studies at the California Institute of Technology.

Kring calls the lunar south pole region "absolutely extraordinary geologic terrain."

"If you really want to understand the origin of the evolution of the solar system, there is no better place ... to go [than] the moon," Kring says. Because the moon has never had an atmosphere or flowing water, it is not subject to weathering and erosion and has thus preserved evidence of its origin, he says.

As technology has steadily improved in the decades since Apollo, the level of detail on the moon's surface revealed by such probes as the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter "is so extraordinary that we've already identified rocks on the lunar surface that we want the astronauts to collect," Kring says.
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Making me nervous.