Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumIt seems that "bean-counters" can't understand art...
because art is something like religion. I am not sure but it seems to me the poster is trying to argue the truth of religion by the existence of art which is something the bean counters (athiests?) can't get.
It's very confusing and also untrue. This little bean counter gets art, so the premise is false.
Oh well. I await the next try.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 966 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It seems that "bean-counters" can't understand art... (Original Post)
uriel1972
May 2013
OP
Warpy
(111,261 posts)1. I remember that thread.
I remember calling the OP several unflattering things, "disingenous" being one of them.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)2. Maybe you should make some art
out of beans.
Julie
rrneck
(17,671 posts)3. Not really...
As far as I'm concerned religion is a subset of the arts.
In an age where religion has made itself look so foolish, art carries the torch for the sort of transcendence that art and faith once shared. Kapoor's work, for instance, rightly resists categorisation.
...
The Marxes and Millers of this world are a mortal danger to true art for they are constantly seeking some reductionist explanation of its value. It may be that some conclude that art (and religion) should therefore have nothing to do with the state and thus give up on state support. I have some sympathy with this. But the alternative may be that these arts executives will then spend their time schmoozing wealthy funders in the Ivy, lunches that always come with strings attached. And art is too valuable to be placed in the hands of those who think value means money.
There is no assumption that "bean counters" are necessarily atheists, but that damage is done to the arts and religion by turning them into a product without consideration for the function of art (and religion) in culture. Religion, as a form of artistic expression, is not synonymous with god. It just seems that way through aggressive, and frequently coercive, marketing.