Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumAustralian School Chaplain funding ruled unlawful
Woohoo! http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-19/high-court-delivers-verdict-on-school-chaplaincy-program/5534546
It brings happiness to my black and withered atheisst heart that a group of potentially unqualified counselors are no longer (hopefully) foisted on young minds.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 764 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Australian School Chaplain funding ruled unlawful (Original Post)
uriel1972
Jun 2014
OP
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)1. It looks like they're trying to find a way to keep them.
School chaplain program funding 'can continue'
The national body for school chaplains says it believes the program will survive despite the court ruling, saying the payments could continue as state and territory grants.
"While the High Court has ruled against the current [funding] model, the court has acknowledged federal funding can continue for chaplaincy through state/territory grants," the National School Chaplaincy Association said in a statement after the ruling.
***
Prime Minister Tony Abbott says the Government will examine ways to ensure the program continues.
"We particularly want the chaplaincy program to continue. It's one we invented. It's one we supported. It's one we took to the election.
"The Attorney-General is having a look at it as we speak, and there will be a response as soon as we can appropriately respond," he said.
"Obviously we want our existing programs to continue. We particularly want the chaplaincy program to continue.
"It's one we invented. It's one we supported. It's one we took to the election."
The national body for school chaplains says it believes the program will survive despite the court ruling, saying the payments could continue as state and territory grants.
"While the High Court has ruled against the current [funding] model, the court has acknowledged federal funding can continue for chaplaincy through state/territory grants," the National School Chaplaincy Association said in a statement after the ruling.
***
Prime Minister Tony Abbott says the Government will examine ways to ensure the program continues.
"We particularly want the chaplaincy program to continue. It's one we invented. It's one we supported. It's one we took to the election.
"The Attorney-General is having a look at it as we speak, and there will be a response as soon as we can appropriately respond," he said.
"Obviously we want our existing programs to continue. We particularly want the chaplaincy program to continue.
"It's one we invented. It's one we supported. It's one we took to the election."
Warpy
(111,255 posts)2. It might be another nail in Abbot's political coffin
A lot of people there voted against the disarray in government and for Abbot and are now having intense buyer's remorse--sound familiar?
I think a cane toad could probably beat Abbot next time if he continues to act like he actually won something.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)3. If only US voters would learn from their mistakes.
Yes please send more tea party republicans to Washington so they can obstruct anything and everything.
What do we want?
We don't know!
When do we want it?
NOW!