Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumFound interesting interpretation: Is Satan a biblical metaphor for science?
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-compelling-reasons-to-consider-switching-to-satan/6 reasons to worship Satan: #1: He's maybe a metaphor for science.
This got me thinking:
1. If he was indeed the serpent in the Garden Eden, he's the reason why we are capable of critical thinking and know the difference between good and evil. He is the reason why we are capable of questioning God, of looking for alternate explanations, of shedding the protected, static life of a pet in Garden Eden for the risky, exciting life of a self-determined intelligent being in the real world.
2. What about the story of Job?
Jehovah: "Hey Satan, this Job is a really big fan of mine."
Satan: "He only likes you because you gave him all this stuff."
Jehovah: "No way, he likes me for my personality."
Satan: "Let's test this."
It is Satan who proposes a test to determine whether someone else's claim is true. Jehovah is the establishment, the tried and true, the old way, the unquestioning belief. Satan is the one whose curiosity shakes this up.
3. The temptation of Christ:
- Satan tempts Jesus Christ to turn stones into bread. This might be hint to a cultural meme that was, back then, only a few millennia old: The beginning of an agrarian society. In the past, people had to forage for food. With the agrarian society, barren earth (stone) was turned into food. (Jesus' answer: That would be futile. Man needs physical and spiritual food.)
- Satan tempts Jesus Christ to test whether God would save him if he jumped of a roof. (Jesus' answer: You are not supposed to test God.)
- Satan tempts Jesus Christ to break with God and worship Satan by promising him rulership over all kingdoms of Earth. How is Satan even capable of making that offer? By what authority? Unless... Unless the kingdoms are a metaphor for the material realm, for the world of the mortals. Satan is capable of offering the material realm to Jesus Christ because he's a metaphor for something deeply connected to the material realm, whereas Jehovah represents the spiritual realm. Satan promises Jesus Christ rulership over the material realm if he worships science and abandons spirituality.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)because faith is the end of inquiry.
I loves me some Bach and was listening to Cantata BWV 178 - Wo Gott der Herr nicht bei uns hält
As Wiki describes it:
In the last aria, in a statement of opposition to rationalismthe "weasel words of rationalists, who would bring down the whole Lutheran theological edifice" in the words of John Eliot Gardinerthe poet expands the words of the reformers' hymn, "Vernunft kann das nicht fassen" (reason cannot grasp it), appealing to reason, described as unstable and frenzied, to be silent.
The music is amazing tho' .... of course.
And yes.... the early scientists are sometimes monks or something like that. But they seem to start out exploring the wonders that god supposedly created to venerate him, but end up showing god superfluous and scripture wrong....and then get in trouble with the church, so.....
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)person who is curious and seeks knowledge is punished or suffers dire consequences
- Eve & apple of knowledge - gets herself and hubby banished from Eden
- Pandora opening the box - brings misery to all
- Prometheus gives humanity the knowledge of fire (wisdom, science), gets chained to a rock and his liver eaten by an eagle for all eternity
(Odin had to stab out his own eye and hang upside down for 9 days to get wisdom, but that was more of self sacrifice than punishment)
unrepentant progress
(611 posts)Draper is riddled with historical errors and promulgates myths worthy of the Bible. If complexity is too much for you to handle, then you might seek out Jones' control model which is probably more to your tastes, and at least has the advantage of being historically accurate.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Civility has its virtues. If you have a different perspective I'd be interested in hearing it.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)And why are they of relevance to this argument?
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Perhaps Draper is Paul W. Draper.... a magician:
(from Wiki: ) Paul Draper is an anthropologist, consultant, and mentalist.
Before embarking on a career in magic and mentalism in Las Vegas, Draper received his degrees in Anthropology in Utah where he was a lecturer at Westminster College and Weber State University.He was later an instructor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas and taught communication studies.
Draper was also the House Magician at the Venetian Hotel and Casinos in Las Vegas.
Jones is obviously Davey Jones from the Monkees
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)It wouldn't be unusual...
edhopper
(33,580 posts)I thought Don Draper was really Richard Whitman?
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)you are talking about?
unrepentant progress
(611 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)what that page says. It says that the original formulation by Draper is not considered historically accurate.
edhopper
(33,580 posts)But religion and reason are usually in conflict.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Just because there is NOT ALWAYS a power-struggle between science and religion, that doesn't mean there isn't SOMETIMES a power-struggle.
Iggo
(47,554 posts)Wow.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)as Prometheus Loki etc.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Which is interesting because the bible refers to both Jesus and Satan as the "Morning Star".
Derpity-doo