Query (thought experiment) for the Day: Are we witnessing or experiencing the inauguration of a...

...“Reverse Diaspora”?

That is, the spontaneous coalescence, amalgamation and melding of a disperse group of individuals who extemporaneously find common ground, common ideals and common purpose in their inter-relationships and who subsequently form a new community, either metaphorically or literally?
(I am speaking of our apparent atheist proto-diaspora)

1) If so, should it be encouraged or otherwise assisted?
a. If yes, what would be the best means: philosophical or physical development or other?
b. If no, why not: loss of independence? Loss of the strength of our inherent diversity (i.e. increased exposure to broad brush criticisms)?

2) If not, would it be beneficial to create a “diasporic meme” within our apparent (albeit dispersed and diverse) proto-community?
a. If yes, shall we (should we?) establish and further develop the meme here?
b. If no, why not? Are we too diverse and thus have no basis for a coalescence other than the rejection of god claims, which in-of-itself is insufficient or otherwise inappropriate?

In a standard diaspora: a community leaves/loses its homeland, however it maintains an identity with the lost homeland for a period of time but individual memories and connections are lost through dispersion and, ultimately, individuals are assimilated by whatever host community they find themselves in.

In my hypothetical reverse diaspora: individuals spontaneously disassociate from their host communities, and begin a process of coalescence through shared exploration, and develop a cohesive narrative and communal(ity) identity.

One of the ideas that popped in my head during this morning’s commute.