Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 01:49 PM Nov 2015

Rupert Murdoch’s National Geographic celebrates the Virgin Mary

Well, the erosion seems to be beginning already, as the latest issue of the magazine has a pretty worshipful article on Christianity: “How the Virgin Mary became the world’s most powerful woman.” It’s an article on Jesus’s mom and the many miracles and cures she’s supposedly wrought throughout the world—miracles that are described in detail and presented without criticism. Lourdes, Our Lady of Guadalupe, and now a vision of Mary by children in the village of Medjugorje in Bosnia and Herzegovina—all of these and more make their appearance.

Now it’s entirely possible that this article was written well before Murdoch took over, as there’s a lag time in the process (some of the incidents reported by author Maureen Orth were from last December), so I can’t be sure that the new regime is responsible for a piece that’s pretty much of a travesty. Nevertheless, I can’t be sure, either, whether the new ownership didn’t approve the final article as well as this cover and the execrable video embedded in the online version (see below):
...
The only notes of doubt are the one-sentence claim by a physicist that the “spinning suns” associated with visions of Mary could be caused by sunlight reflected through charged ice crystals, and the warning that we can’t be certain that the Bible gives us correct details of Mary’s life because it was written a few decades after the fact. But there’s also no caveat that Mary (and Jesus) might not have been real, and no skepticism that these miracles could either reflect false reporting (as in the case that led to the beatification of Mother Teresa) or are rare spontaneous remissions. As many doubters have noted, none of the miracles involve regrowing limbs or eyes—things that never under any circumstances, religious or not.

It’s telling that the three-minute video that accompanies the online article features “researcher” Michael O’Neill, who just happens to run the website The Miracle Hunter, a site that seems to buy those miracles vetted by the Catholic church. O’Neill also has an apparently Christian-oriented radio show. In the video below, O’Neill (who I bet is a Catholic) seems overly credulous in accepting the reality of miracles that are officially approved by the Catholic Church. Get a load of it, and remember that it’s in National Geographic:



https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2015/11/29/rupert-murdochs-national-geographic-celebrates-the-virgin-mary/


Skimming through, it does seem extremely credulous. NatGeo should be a fact-based publication, but, as Jerry Coyne says, "it’s a reprehensible osculation of faith by a formerly reputable magazine".
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rupert Murdoch’s National Geographic celebrates the Virgin Mary (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Nov 2015 OP
National Geographic R.I.P. nt valerief Nov 2015 #1
Ain't that the truth. *Sigh* n/t bvf Nov 2015 #2
Sad death of reality.. mountain grammy Nov 2015 #3
I grew up with National Geographic NastyRiffraff Nov 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Nov 2015 #7
I used to subscribe. Never again. Binkie The Clown Nov 2015 #5
Thanks, I didn't know RM owned NG now. onager Nov 2015 #6

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
4. I grew up with National Geographic
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 02:11 PM
Nov 2015

My dad was a subscriber and kept all the issues. I learned a lot from them. Very sad to see it go.

Response to NastyRiffraff (Reply #4)

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
5. I used to subscribe. Never again.
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 02:30 AM
Nov 2015

It's time for all thinking people to simply walk away from the travesty that Murdoch has wrought.

onager

(9,356 posts)
6. Thanks, I didn't know RM owned NG now.
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 09:01 AM
Nov 2015

Let the bottom-feeding commence! A friend subscribes to the NG offshoot magazine "History" and she's passing them along to me. I like that mag and haven't seen any obvious religious glurge in it yet. But will now brace myself...

Speaking of bottom-feeding, Murdoch did do ONE good thing that I know of. When O.J. Simpson "wrote" his "book" (If) I Did It, it was originally a project of a Murdoch publishing house. His employee Maureen Regan put the deal together.

The book was seen as a huge slap in the face to the Brown/Goldman families. Simpson not only pretty much confessed to the murders, he stood to make a huge pot of money off the book deal.

Murdoch stopped the publication and fired Regan. A court case later awarded all book rights and subsequent profits to the Browns and Goldmans.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Rupert Murdoch’s National...