2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Elizabeth Warren Dominates Scott Brown In First Debate" at Politicus USA
Elizabeth Warren Dominates Scott Brown In First DebateBy: Jason Easley at Politicus USA
http://www.politicususa.com/elizabeth-warren-dominates-scott-brown-debate.html
"SNIP...........................................
Warren weathered an early storm by having to answer questions about the flap over whether she used her heritage as an advantage in order to get hired. Warren quickly turned the tables on Brown and was able to shake his bipartisan image by pointing out that he voted against three jobs bills. Warren continually returned to the point that Sen. Brown will hold tax cuts for the 98% hostage unless taxes are cut for the top 2%. For his part, Brown kept using statistics from big business and the Chamber of Commerce in order to paint Warren as a tax and spend liberal.
Knowing that he is trailing badly with women, Brown highlighted his pro-choice beliefs and his work on the Violence Against Women Act. Warren pointed out that Brown voted against equal pay for equal work, a pro-choice justice, and against womens access to birth control. Brown tried to use the religious freedom argument and claimed that he wasnt going to put women against their church. Warren reminded him that the president had already resolved the religious freedom issue, but he supported the harsh Blunt Amendment. Brown tried to claim Ted Kennedy fought for the same thing and told Warren to stop tying to scare women. Brown relied on the old I have a house full of women line to defend his vote against equal pay for equal work.
A really bizarre moment occurred while they were debating foreign policy. Warren brought up Mitt Romney, and Brown replied by praising Hillary Clinton. (Mitt Romney really is that toxic.) Warren tied herself to Obamas foreign policy, which was a smart move in a state where the President is leading by 18-28 points.
Brown jabbed at Warrens annual income, and kept coming back to the claim that she wants to raise taxes. Scott Browns strategy is simple. He is hoping to peel off conservative Democrats by portraying Warren as an extreme tax and spend liberal. Warren hit Brown for voting to raise student loan rates, and opposing closing a loophole that is used by the wealthy. Browns consistent reply when his voting record was brought is that Warren is lying about his record
...........................................SNIP"
Nancy Waterman
(6,407 posts)I think may have cost him the election. He was so offensive and nasty, and it was so irrelevant.
applegrove
(118,767 posts)a career politician and he was.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)just look at her and not see it. Fucking idiot. My niece and nephew are Eskimo from her dad being one hundred percent Eskimo but they look Norwegian. His comment about see, you can't see moccassins so she isn't Indian flabbergasts me. I would move there to vote against him.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Bad moves, performed badly
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)on Rachel's show, but dang he was nasty and absurd.
BadGimp
(4,018 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)BootinUp
(47,185 posts)I think this race is a good test of whether Americans are paying attention or not.
patrice
(47,992 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)*** Elizabeth Warren v. Scott Brown -- Debate ***
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251102492
riverbendviewgal
(4,253 posts)That may be because he thought he could duck out, using having to vote in the Senate... Sen Harry Reid fixed that and stopped all voting in the Senate so that Brown could make his debate.....Love Harry Reid.
I sure do love Elizabeth Warren, ever since I saw telling her story to a small home party that we all did not build our businesses ourselves.....
She is so smart and articulate.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)REPUBLICANISM is a dying political philosophy that Brown can't run from. His vote helps the Republican obstruction in the Senate.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)I bet Scotty cursed him all the way home
flamingdem
(39,320 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)effective when telling what she'd do about subsidies, agricultural and to oil; fraud-waste-and-abuse; pentagon excesses and other areas.