Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,729 posts)
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 03:13 PM Jan 2016

Charlie Cook: For Clinton, It’s Time to Stay Cool in Iowa and New Hampshire

National Journal:

...snip...

The Clin­ton cam­paign’s chal­lenge is to rep­lic­ate as closely as pos­sible the sup­port and voter turnout levels that the Obama cam­paign man­aged in 2008 and 2012. It will be ex­tremely dif­fi­cult to do. The fact that she turns 69 in Septem­ber doesn’t help, be­cause she could face a Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ent nearly a quarter-cen­tury young­er. Cer­tain GOP nom­in­ees might drive up Demo­crat­ic turnout for her, but oth­ers might not seem as threat­en­ing, rais­ing the pos­sib­il­ity that many Demo­crat­ic voters will stay at home.

A hard move to the left would make her job of win­ning over in­de­pend­ent and mod­er­ate voters in the gen­er­al elec­tion even more chal­len­ging. In­de­pend­ents tend to have very com­plic­ated views of Clin­ton, see­ing her on one hand as smart, know­ledge­able, and com­pet­ent, but on the oth­er hand as not par­tic­u­larly likable or trust­worthy. Big ideo­lo­gic­al swings over the course of the cam­paign aren’t likely to help her cred­ib­il­ity.

It can’t be fun for Clin­ton to be Sanders’s piñata this month and next, but for March 1 on, it shouldn’t be that bad, and there is no point win­ning the nom­in­a­tion if you render your­self un­elect­able in the fall.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charlie Cook: For Clinton, It’s Time to Stay Cool in Iowa and New Hampshire (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2016 OP
Is this another "poor Hillary" OP? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #1
No it is campaign advice from a pundit. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #2
I wouldn't call twice "a lot". Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #3
Or you could respond to Charlie Cook's advice, as that's the subject of the OP emulatorloo Jan 2016 #4
I'll take it under consideration. But, I love centrist pinatas. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #5
Might have to steal that one, lol emulatorloo Jan 2016 #6

emulatorloo

(44,183 posts)
2. No it is campaign advice from a pundit.
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jan 2016

I notice you post this phrase a lot.

I imagine that you have a macro that types out "Is this another 'poor Hillary' OP?" when you hit a single key.

So I'm assuming you hit it by accident this time.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
3. I wouldn't call twice "a lot".
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jan 2016

Next time I'll use "sad" or "tragic" or "heartbreaking" or "woeful".

Would that be "not as bad" like Hillary's politics?

emulatorloo

(44,183 posts)
4. Or you could respond to Charlie Cook's advice, as that's the subject of the OP
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jan 2016

Of course you can do whatever you want.

Actually I think having a set of macros could be a great idea when posting on DU. We all have our catch-phrases!

Have a good afternoon.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Charlie Cook: For Clinton...