Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie's Pro-Choice commitment extends beyond choice
From his book Outsider in the House (1997)
The Rutland Herald ran a detailed article contrasting my views on abortion with my opponent Susan Sweetser. My position is that a woman's decision whether to have an abortion is a private one, and that this principle must hold true for all women, regardless of income. Sweetster describes herself as pro-choice. On the surface, our positions appear similar. But there is one significant difference. She supports a woman's right to an abortion, but only if that woman can afford to pay for one.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 735 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie's Pro-Choice commitment extends beyond choice (Original Post)
Armstead
Jan 2016
OP
I don't know why you posted that headline. It is bullshit, as you well know. n/t
CaliforniaPeggy
Jan 2016
#4
randys1
(16,286 posts)1. WHAT? Link? This says Bernie supports unlimited access by all Women
which sounds like him
Armstead
(47,803 posts)2. The headline is....
randys1
(16,286 posts)3. Normally I would catch it but by adding some statement of some other person
Armstead
(47,803 posts)5. That was a quote from his book in 1997
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,739 posts)4. I don't know why you posted that headline. It is bullshit, as you well know. n/t
Armstead
(47,803 posts)6. It's in response to the bullshit being thrown at him
But maybe I'll change it
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,739 posts)7. Thanks for changing it! It's a great improvement.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)9. You seem like a smart person so it's hard to believe you don't understand the negative
slant to your titles (which has been occurring for weeks).
And no, I understand sarcasm.
And I'm sure you understand many people only read titles.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)8. kick!