Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:58 AM Jan 2016

Clinton changes tone on Sanders

Good move. Now maybe she can tell her acolytes to chill with that Red Baiting crap, so we can get back to debating the real issues plaguing this country.

:Snip:

As her allies acknowledged that her forceful attacks on Bernie Sanders have backfired, Hillary Clinton on Thursday softened the edges on her criticism of her main primary opponent, arguing that his heart is in the right place even if his proposals are wrong.

Her new tone marked a contrast from last week, when her forceful dismissal of his universal health care system appeared to boomerang.

:Snip:

But her message was clearer: “in theory isn’t enough … I’m not interested in ideas that sound good on paper, but will never make it in the real world.”

Lauding Sanders for having the right idea, at least, may have been a more appealing tone for the audience, where many of Clinton’s own diehard supporters said they like what they see in Sanders.
“I know Bernie, and I think he’s a good man — and I think he’d be a good running mate,” said Sally Gibson, a retired teacher supporting Clinton. “He’s a good man, we need people like that.”
Indeed, Clinton tried to straddle the line between lauding Sanders’ intentions while portraying his plans as unrealistic.




Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-attacks-backfire-218091#ixzz3yA2XjMJA

I thoroughly disagree with her new message by the way. Great presidents have aspirational goals that inspire the masses to join the fight. When your plan is to triangulate their way to meritocracy, the least you could do is aim high.

Berners know that we may not get everything we want. But you can't rally the masses to leverage your agenda with "It's too hard". And not every fix to our broken system requires a 60 vote supermajority.

Back to the issues. Now isn't that more civilized?
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

pengu

(462 posts)
1. I'd strongly prefer Sanders not have Clinton as his VP
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 08:02 AM
Jan 2016
“I know Bernie, and I think he’s a good man — and I think he’d be a good running mate,” said Sally Gibson, a retired teacher supporting Clinton.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
8. Diddo. That's what campaigns say when they fear their opponent.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 08:55 AM
Jan 2016

But he should announce the affiliation of his possible choice of running mate. And as soon as possible.

Something like:

"And just so their are no questions, I will pick a Progressive Democrat as my running mate, that you can count on.... and I have plenty of inspiring options at my disposal"

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
2. A bit late to put the negative genie back in the bottle after the last week
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 08:04 AM
Jan 2016

Probably better than doubling down would have been, but the damage is still already done.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
15. She will continue to have her surrogates employ scorched Earth policy though.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 11:05 AM
Jan 2016

If she does nothing to denounce that or ask them to stop she endorses it. Period.

femmedem

(8,203 posts)
4. Electing Sanders is part of the long game:
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 08:05 AM
Jan 2016

Even if he isn't able to get much of his agenda through Congress, his election would be a signal to future candidates that it isn't political death to fight for economic justice.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
16. Exactly. At the end of a Sanders Presidency our country would be much better positioned to
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jan 2016

eventually, one day, actually be able to enact his policies.

I strongly believe this, and this is why I so passionately argue for him.

We will be nowhere closer to enacting (Bernie's/many of ours) preferred policies at the end of a Hillary Presidency. Her Party Chair will continue to recruit "pro-business" Democrats. The Senate will be just as littered with neo-liberal Democrats then as it is now.

We have to START the process one day of getting this Party back to the Party of FDR. If we don't start now with Bernie (and HIS Party Chair) we will be waiting another decade. That is going to be devastating for so many people ultimately.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
6. Classic plausible deniability. Tone it down personally
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 08:09 AM
Jan 2016

Have the darling surrogates turn it up.

Despicable.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
10. New Clinton Campaign Promise:
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 09:08 AM
Jan 2016

"I won't try cuz' it's too hard."


Yeah, that'll pump up those sagging numbers!


merrily

(45,251 posts)
13. General Washington never said that and his soldiers had no shoes in snow.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 09:14 AM
Jan 2016

Fighting what was then the best trained army in the world.

FDR never said that as a stock market crash and the Dust Bowl had the country circling the drain.

Bernie Sanders never said that, through thirty years of neo-liberal and RW control.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
18. She is just atrocious at running a campaign.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jan 2016

So now not only does she take the "hit" for being so negative, she also loses any benefit for going that negative to begin with.

Why on Earth does anyone think she's a good candidate? "Inevitability" as your strategy in your second presidential campaign???? Then "Hopes and dreams? We can't have those. We can only dream of what the Republicans let us do". Now this scorched-Earth followed by "nevermind!!"

FFS, fire all your staff and bring in people who know what the hell they are doing.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton changes tone on S...