2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton's Foreign Policy Attacks Are Naive and Dangerous
January 22, 2016
The Clinton campaign's latest broadside against Bernie Sanders will only remind Democrats what they don't like about her.
"Irresponsible and frankly naive." That's how then Sen. Hillary Clinton criticized the foreign policy approach of then Sen. Barack Obama in 2007. And we all know how that turned out.
If you're a politics watcher, you'd be forgiven for experiencing a bit of deja vu over the last 48 hours courtesy of the Clinton campaign. Just like she did during the 2008 primary cycle, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is characterizing her opponent's foreign policy positions and particularly his stance toward Iran as insufficiently thought-through, attempting to unmask him as a novice who is in over his head. It's not any likelier to work this time around.
For starters, Clinton is making a mountain out of a molehill when it comes to the actual daylight between her and Sen. Bernie Sanders who, depending on which poll you look at, is either way ahead or within a couple of points of her in the race to win the Iowa caucuses when it comes to Iran. She's seized on his comments during Sunday's Democratic debate, when Sanders said, "I think what we've got to do is move as aggressively as we can to normalize relations with Iran," to paint him as taking a dangerous stance toward the Islamic Republic.
A Clinton senior policy adviser took Sanders to task, saying, "This proposal to more aggressively normalize relations and to move to warm relations with Iran not only breaks with President Obamas policy, it breaks with the sober and responsible diplomatic approach thats been working for the United States." Another Clinton aide added, "I can safely predict that Republicans would love to have a debate with someone who thinks we should move quickly to warmer relations with a major sponsor of terrorism like Iran."
Back here in reality, the difference of opinion between Sanders and Clinton on this issue is slight, if it exists at all. During the debate, Sanders dinged both Iran's anti-American rhetoric and its support for terrorism, before plugging his support for the nuclear accord negotiated by the Obama administration. He added, "So if your question is, do I want to see that relationship become more positive in the future? Yes. Can I tell that we should open an embassy in Tehran tomorrow? No, I don't think we should."
in full: http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/pat-garofalo/articles/2016-01-22/hillary-clintons-iran-attack-on-bernie-sanders-sounds-like-2008
Z_California
(650 posts)to LOW INFORMATION voters.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)As well as the obviously incapable-of-doing-their-own-research-on-Brock-Hillary-lies black folk.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I don't think it will work, but regardless Bernie should be prepared for Monday
with these kinds of attacks. He should be able to articulate why
Iran fighting against ISIS is a viable option, and should ask Clinton to
explain why Saudi Arabia is and has been such a great ally against
ISIS...b/c they have not.
He should also ask her why we have a 60 billion dollar arms deal
with Saudi Arabia..over the next 20 years. Why is that a great
idea when we know that the house of Saud has fueled and funded
an extreme form Wahhabism. WHO benefits?
What the Saudis have done in Yemen is disgusting, would she
like to talk about that too?
I do hope Bernie is not afraid of standing apart from Obama no
matter what..and one way is to punt back with questions to
Clinton.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)liberal sources, more and more they are by the MSM itself. I think that means that the media embargo is over and in spite of them, Bernie is at par or better on the campaign trail. I loved Seth McFarland's take on it.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I must have missed Seth's take on it..something recent?
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)your way. It was hilarious...factual...and hit the target.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I like it, Seth being a part of the wealthy class he asks, why can't we do
this for all Americans?
https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/videos/979379045488483/
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Seth Myers...sorry.
and the one I was mentioning...
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)a few good vids in this thread..so thanks.