Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:28 PM Jan 2016

Here's what the Democratic establishment is telling us:

Voters should only be able to choose candidates we approve of.

The democratic establishment wants one of their own. The members of that club were happy to indulge Bernie when they thought he could never possibly be a threat to to Hillary who really is the candidate anointed by the establishment.

Now? They won't hesitate to do whatever it takes to protect Hillary.

It's a club.

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's what the Democratic establishment is telling us: (Original Post) cali Jan 2016 OP
their problem though, the tent is made out of wet tissue paper, litlbilly Jan 2016 #1
And they won't hesitate.... daleanime Jan 2016 #2
It's clearnow that the DNC has no intention of supporting Bernie when he wins it. Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #19
They wouldn't give the nom to Hillary if Bernie won SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #21
Possibly. draa Jan 2016 #28
I think, more than Possible Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #29
There wouldn't be enough Democrats left to elect anyone. draa Jan 2016 #32
That is unacceptable! SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #38
Agree 100% Hillary and Debbie will probably ask their supporters to back Bloomberg in the GE LongTomH Jan 2016 #22
THey would be kidding themselves. THe BIllionaire Oligarch would loose worse than HIllary Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #52
Let them eat trump, then Voice for Peace Jan 2016 #51
And Debbie Wasserman-Schultz feels free to support GOP buddies - against Democratic candidates - djean111 Jan 2016 #3
Debbie is the Wicked Witch of the southeast. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #17
Well, I'm the morrally ambiguous Witch of the Northwest n/t eridani Jan 2016 #53
It really is a club, and of a particular mindset. I once thought it was all inclusive, RKP5637 Jan 2016 #4
I don't know Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #27
Lol. draa Jan 2016 #33
Yep! George Carlin was spot on then and still today. I think many Americans are FINALLY waking up RKP5637 Jan 2016 #40
This should be remembered when considering Hillary. highprincipleswork Jan 2016 #5
OP is spot on. HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #6
They are correct: the voters should only vote for candidates the voters approve of. Witness Bernie! Vincardog Jan 2016 #7
Bernie's only way to stay out of the establishment control was to work with them but libdem4life Jan 2016 #8
I read a news story that said the democratic elite have developed "antipathy" towards Bernie JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #9
Est. Dems appear to have no problem cutting off their nose, to spite their face. 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #12
It's a club Proserpina Jan 2016 #10
very well put farleftlib Jan 2016 #14
I am so stealing that. draa Jan 2016 #34
Be my guest! Proserpina Jan 2016 #36
Keep at it though, and you'll join the ranks of KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #55
+1000000. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #39
Yup, that big tent can only fit 1% inside it farleftlib Jan 2016 #11
We are 99 times bigger than their club. Gregorian Jan 2016 #13
And there's the secret, shear numbers of votes. n/t WHEN CRABS ROAR Jan 2016 #44
much worse: that the voters are here to serve the pols, that we're just to attend the rally, MisterP Jan 2016 #15
Bernie is a threat to them and their corporate gravy train. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #16
... And WE ain't invited! MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #18
Like I have said before. WHEN CRABS ROAR Jan 2016 #46
The DNC Serves The 1% - The Voters Serve The DNC - Hence We All Serve cantbeserious Jan 2016 #20
"It's a club." Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #23
It's a club . . . Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #41
Easy, easy does it--no need to anticipate problems. this also antagonizes others needlessly. Akamai Jan 2016 #24
Well If Bernie wins the nomination and the DNC fails to INdemo Jan 2016 #30
It is what's happening. cali Jan 2016 #42
There is a possibility of a repeat of the 1968 Democratic Convention. It is about time. LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #25
as well as it's precedent Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #31
Thank you.. So that really was when business took the soul of the Democratic party. LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #35
This country would look Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #43
Is that how Sanders supporters plan to behave if Hillary legitimately clinches the nomination? Metric System Jan 2016 #47
I think it will be the Hillary supporters out protesting though. LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #48
You have rewritten a lot of history here. The Dem Party used a significantly KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #56
We cannot permit some officious bitch or bastard to do this again Proserpina Jan 2016 #57
Didn't George Carlin tell us this ...How many times? INdemo Jan 2016 #26
Where did the "Democratic establishment" tell us that? Fact is, that's simply not true. George II Jan 2016 #37
Can't always be Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #45
"and YOU are not in it." George Carlin mhatrw Jan 2016 #49
"And you ain't in it." George Carlin. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #50
The same club that endorsed, supported, and brought Obama to the WH. randr Jan 2016 #54
In another thread, a Clintonista implied that 'after HRC takes office', closeupready Jan 2016 #58

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
19. It's clearnow that the DNC has no intention of supporting Bernie when he wins it.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:27 PM
Jan 2016

The DNC oligarchy is in "anyone but Bernie" mode.

Yet they want Bernie supporters to swear we will support ANY Dem (read Hillary) candidate

They are lying again.

draa

(975 posts)
28. Possibly.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:07 PM
Jan 2016

She's supposed to have over a hundred Super Delegates locked up and Bernie has 16 the last I heard. Whether the Democrats will stage a coup should Bernie be leading Clinton come time for the convention? Who knows, after what they've shown so far we shouldn't trust them though. Ever again.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
29. I think, more than Possible
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:09 PM
Jan 2016

The only question is, what will people do when they fuck us that overtly?

draa

(975 posts)
32. There wouldn't be enough Democrats left to elect anyone.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:14 PM
Jan 2016

The people would leave the party in mass. But that still wouldn't matter to the establishment because they'd just carry on fucking us with a GOP government.

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
22. Agree 100% Hillary and Debbie will probably ask their supporters to back Bloomberg in the GE
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:48 PM
Jan 2016

I think voters are smarter than that; but, I could be wrong!

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. And Debbie Wasserman-Schultz feels free to support GOP buddies - against Democratic candidates -
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:33 PM
Jan 2016

here in Florida. With no repercussions. So the establishment can kiss my patootie.

It is hilariously obvious that Bernie was just supposed to herd progressives and liberals into the Hillary chute, and then go away. Not going to happen.

RKP5637

(67,109 posts)
4. It really is a club, and of a particular mindset. I once thought it was all inclusive,
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:33 PM
Jan 2016

but it isn't.

Marty McGraw

(1,024 posts)
27. I don't know
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:02 PM
Jan 2016

if it is a Big club these days; but more an exclusive club. And buddy... You ain't in it!

RKP5637

(67,109 posts)
40. Yep! George Carlin was spot on then and still today. I think many Americans are FINALLY waking up
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jan 2016

and looking behind the curtains at the wizards at the $$$$$ machine raking it in for themselves and their buddies. Just a quick glance at the wealth distribution chart for the US tells us how screwed we currently are. And also, something like 61 people own most of the wealth of earth. It's insane.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
6. OP is spot on.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:34 PM
Jan 2016

I've been willing to give political parties the benefit of the doubt before, but this election has proven to me that regular people don't have as much of a voice as we think we do.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
7. They are correct: the voters should only vote for candidates the voters approve of. Witness Bernie!
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:34 PM
Jan 2016
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
8. Bernie's only way to stay out of the establishment control was to work with them but
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:36 PM
Jan 2016

not for them. He saw it long before most of us did...he was there. It is said he does not have an enemy in Congress. How could that be? Because he doesn't belong to interests that would require him to dig his heels in come what may...and that is usually conflict. That's what the two party system thrives on...conflict. He doesn't do that...thus, people are getting a different perspective of American politics, what it has been, what it is, and what it could be. That's how I read The Revolution.

True, the Establishment only came to him for his support and used it to their advantage, when he joined them. Now, his secret is out...and a lot of us got the message.

When the People are ready, the Leader will appear.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
9. I read a news story that said the democratic elite have developed "antipathy" towards Bernie
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:38 PM
Jan 2016

I read a news story that said the democratic elite have developed "antipathy" towards Bernie solely because of his success in attracting voters. It was fine when he was talking about issues and affecting the conversation, but now that he has a chance to win the nomination he is the enemy.

It's clear they view voters with great disdain.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
12. Est. Dems appear to have no problem cutting off their nose, to spite their face.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:48 PM
Jan 2016

Or looking a gift horse in the mouth ... choose your favorite phrase .. it amounts to the
same thing, and it couldn't be more obvious.

Use Bernie to attract new people into the Big Tent, then denigrate him for his trouble.

It's despicable.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
55. Keep at it though, and you'll join the ranks of
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 11:04 AM
Jan 2016

Dorothy "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy" Parker and Oscar "The best way to get rid of temptation is to give into it" Wilde. What's a few bucks when compared to immortality?

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
11. Yup, that big tent can only fit 1% inside it
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

the other 99% can stand outside in the cold and await further instructions.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
15. much worse: that the voters are here to serve the pols, that we're just to attend the rally,
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:52 PM
Jan 2016

hear the empty speech, give our time and money, surrender our votes on the appointed day, and then not make any demands because the Republicans will win

the voters, in other words, are barely participants in the election--they're more like raw material or poker chips; we're corralled by footmen and disciplined with guilt trips and swaggering Grover Dill toadies

we're definitely not ADULTS in their eyes

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
16. Bernie is a threat to them and their corporate gravy train.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:53 PM
Jan 2016

A President Sanders will put in a progressive DNC chair who will clean house and that terrifies all the people who have benefited from corporate corruption for decades.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
18. ... And WE ain't invited!
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:57 PM
Jan 2016

Too bad! Somebody needs to inform you pretenders that the club STARTS


HERE.

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
46. Like I have said before.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:49 PM
Jan 2016

Now is the time for a real progressive populist movement, but the message needs to be clear and not overly complex and it needs to be repeated over and over to drive it home into the minds of the people.

Then Bernie will win.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
20. The DNC Serves The 1% - The Voters Serve The DNC - Hence We All Serve
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jan 2016

The Oligarchs, Corporations and Banks.

 

Akamai

(1,779 posts)
24. Easy, easy does it--no need to anticipate problems. this also antagonizes others needlessly.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:55 PM
Jan 2016

I do think that Bernie will win the nomination, will be supported by the Democratic Party, will win the White House, and will drag the larger Democratic Party along with him.

With Bernie in the White House, we will have a resetting of the political norms, back to FDR/Kennedy/Johnson days.

I don't think that the Democratic Party will be able to switch the rules at this time, even if some important people there (such as Deborah Wasserman Schultz, Ed Rendell, etc.) wish otherwise.

If Bernie loses the nomination to Hillary, I will wholeheartedly support her. But at this point, I am delighted with Bernie's rise in the polls and the huge support he is getting from the American people.

Go BERNIE!!!!

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
30. Well If Bernie wins the nomination and the DNC fails to
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:12 PM
Jan 2016

recognize him as the nominee and supports an Independent well that will tell the world the Democratic Party is not the Party of Working Class Americans but an extension of the Republican Party.







Bernie Sanders can win this !!!!

LiberalArkie

(15,716 posts)
25. There is a possibility of a repeat of the 1968 Democratic Convention. It is about time.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:58 PM
Jan 2016

The party elites were not getting their way. Kennedy was gone. King was gone. Daley and others wanted to make sure things went their way. Google it and watch some of the video. The whole world was indeed watching. I can almost imagine the Republican convention having it happen also.







LiberalArkie

(15,716 posts)
35. Thank you.. So that really was when business took the soul of the Democratic party.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:18 PM
Jan 2016

And then took the rest with Clinton.

Marty McGraw

(1,024 posts)
43. This country would look
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:38 PM
Jan 2016

so different and for the better if that underhandedness didn't take place. After such a True Restructure post FDR could you immagine how Awesome the 'WORLD' would be today if someone of True Heart like Wallace were to have Taken the Ticket?

I suppose the overwhelming sense of security after such a cataclysmic moment in history, once more, left the general populace with their guard down for this to have happened.

Voting Day Should be a Mon. Tue. Holiday with penalties for non-attendance at least. Aussie's really have done it well in this respect.

LiberalArkie

(15,716 posts)
48. I think it will be the Hillary supporters out protesting though.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:59 PM
Jan 2016

But there is a lot of history. In 1968 the youth were fighting and campaigning for a young upstart named "Robert Kennedy" against the party favorite of Hubert Humphrey. He was the party favorite and just had to wait for the coronation in Chicago. When Kennedy was killed the young then wanted Eugene McCarthy, the party did not want any one but Humphrey. "It was his time". He had all the experience after all. The only problem was the people wanted Kennedy and then McCarthy.

I was only 20 at the time and was not able to vote. I did not know of any one of my friends that ever voted for anyone until Jimmy Carter was the candidate. It kind of soured a whole generation for quite a while.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
56. You have rewritten a lot of history here. The Dem Party used a significantly
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jan 2016

different method for selecting its nominee back in 1968 than it does today. (The system we use today largely came about because of '68 and wee first used to nominate McGovern in 1972.)

RFK only entered the race AFTER McCarthy had demonstrated LBJ's vulnerability by almost winning New Hampshire from an elected incumbent.

Young voters did not want RFK first and McCarthy second. Just the opposite.

After RFK's assassination, his delegates did not go to McCarthy. Instead, RFK's delegates became unpledged and subject to then-extant Dem Party rules, i. e., the Machine.

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
57. We cannot permit some officious bitch or bastard to do this again
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jan 2016

And I'm talking to YOU, Debbie! And anyone who feels entitled as you do to make up the rules to suit purely personal interests.

An election is not somebody's private weapon.

George II

(67,782 posts)
37. Where did the "Democratic establishment" tell us that? Fact is, that's simply not true.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jan 2016

You like throwing these things out with no facts, not even substantiated opinion.

If the so-called "Democratic establishment" is so horrible, why did the outsider Bernie Sanders decide to toss his hat in the Democratic ring for their nomination? Surely there are better organizations/banners under which he could have run for President.

randr

(12,412 posts)
54. The same club that endorsed, supported, and brought Obama to the WH.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 10:54 AM
Jan 2016

Once the voting was counted. Lets not drop the eggs from the basket in our haste to make an omelet.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
58. In another thread, a Clintonista implied that 'after HRC takes office',
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 03:28 PM
Jan 2016

those who had started threads here criticizing her (and those who had joined in the criticism) would be punished, in some unstated way. I don't believe that to be true for a single second, but think about the mind of someone who posts something like that... I mean, is that a club, or a gang?

Wowzers, people here take this board way too seriously - not you, Cali, but her supporters who are incapable of being good sports.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here's what the Democrati...