Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
90 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has Hillary stated a position on reparations? (Original Post) grasswire Jan 2016 OP
Question: Will you beleive her if she states one? Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #1
These requirements only apply to Bernie. mmonk Jan 2016 #2
Of course she hasn't. Thought this article was a thoughtful reminder of Clinton positions. highprincipleswork Jan 2016 #3
She's not the one calling for unicorns from congress !! False equivalency at best, If HRC said she uponit7771 Jan 2016 #4
You would be wrong on all counts. Not being consistent is insisting that Bernie call for reparations Autumn Jan 2016 #10
She doesn't, she's not proffering we pass impossible bills without the votes from congress!!! Sander uponit7771 Jan 2016 #12
Neither is Bernie proffering we pass impossible bills without the votes from congress. Autumn Jan 2016 #17
Yes he is!! OMG, is anyone listening to each other?! The GOP Gerrymandered congress is NOT uponit7771 Jan 2016 #35
I'm listening to how Bernie says he will attempt to get things through. Autumn Jan 2016 #40
I have too and its like Sanders has been missing for the last 6 years and doesn't udnerstand uponit7771 Jan 2016 #41
Sanders very much understand how things work, including gerrymandering. Autumn Jan 2016 #43
But if 8 billion people wanted you to you would right? I mean, its a popular thing to do... uponit7771 Jan 2016 #47
You are NOT even making sense so I will just say have a nice day and be done with this. Autumn Jan 2016 #49
another cut and run from part of the revolution uponit7771 Jan 2016 #53
If you try to make sense of the topic at hand I may decide to respond to you but as it stands this Autumn Jan 2016 #56
What I posted made perfect sense, there's no one is going to influence you to do anything you uponit7771 Jan 2016 #57
wow, what bullshit. this is typical of the hill people.......No we can't!!!! what a pathetic motto. bowens43 Jan 2016 #84
No we can't all jump to the moon or get a gerrymandered GOP congress to care about America uponit7771 Jan 2016 #85
Is there any support TeddyR Jan 2016 #5
no, because she's "the X candidate" so she doesn't have to prove herself MisterP Jan 2016 #6
NOT GOOD ENOUGH BERNIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #7
The difference: Hillary isn't promising invisible flying unicorns. nt Cali_Democrat Jan 2016 #8
You guys don't care a whit about reparations whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #15
You now have the floor. Make the case For or against reparations. oasis Jan 2016 #45
Why? whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #51
Okay then, I had the impression YOU cared "a whit about reparations". nt oasis Jan 2016 #63
What do you got? whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #64
The first sentence wisdom of post# 51 suits me as well. oasis Jan 2016 #68
Bullshit, I sure in the hell do ... I don't know where you got that from uponit7771 Jan 2016 #48
If you excuse our current (AA) president and candidate Clinton from the same scrutiny whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #54
They're not fighting against their own establishment as a revolutionary Sanders is, I'd accept the.. uponit7771 Jan 2016 #86
Bernie Sanders: Too revolutionary, not revolutionary enough. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #88
One would think. merrily Jan 2016 #83
here you go 10 hours of unicorns juxtaposed Jan 2016 #21
And neither is Bernie. cali Jan 2016 #37
You're right Cali_Democrat Jan 2016 #44
They either don't understand how congress works, don't understand the effects of gerrymandering uponit7771 Jan 2016 #50
Here ya go. cali Jan 2016 #55
Then you know damn well there is not consequence to the GOP burning down a pediatric uponit7771 Jan 2016 #58
Here ya go. Try to get it. cali Jan 2016 #52
Again, the GOP HISTORICALLY gerrymandered congress doesn't have to give a damn about culture, shifts uponit7771 Jan 2016 #59
Yes. Clinton has a clear position and her campaign have been adamant about it. Have you not heard Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #9
hahaha grasswire Jan 2016 #60
"She doesn't have to because she's not calling for a political revolution!" whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #11
truly fucking batshit! it's interesting what that bunch considers "unicorns". m-lekktor Jan 2016 #18
Isn't it though? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #19
lol m-lekktor Jan 2016 #20
Which is a rational expectation, she's not calling for the improbable to happen because of whatever uponit7771 Jan 2016 #74
If you really care about reparations her opinion should matter to you. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #79
I know her opinion and its reasonable, calling for revolution with asterisks by it isn't uponit7771 Jan 2016 #80
If you know then what is her opinion? Surely you've researched it since it's so important to you. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #81
Apparently, not being in favor of anything means you don't have to answer such questions. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #13
The word/meme of the day from Camp Weathervane is UNICORNS. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #14
Got it. NowSam Jan 2016 #29
I want to see her position on this and her COMPLETE 50 PAGE explanation of how she would implement in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #16
She probably laughed. It goes without saying she supported them if she supported Barry Goldwater... cascadiance Jan 2016 #22
Probably hasn't been asked JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #23
Hillary doesn't live in a fantasy world. Bernie does. DanTex Jan 2016 #24
What a ridiculous post Kentonio Jan 2016 #25
It's true though. Bernie wants unicorns for everyone. But not reparations. Hmmm... DanTex Jan 2016 #26
Yeah its all just unicorns.. Kentonio Jan 2016 #34
+1, they're more into ad homs which are an indicator of a weak position on this uponit7771 Jan 2016 #75
She has, in a debate with Lazio Recursion Jan 2016 #27
I don't see a clear answer in her response. Qutzupalotl Jan 2016 #31
Agreed; I just mean that's literally what she has said (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #65
That remark is being "for" reparations while also being "against" them. Vinca Jan 2016 #36
I was not aware that taking a stand on an apology owed is a stand on reparations, at least not the Autumn Jan 2016 #38
The transcript is at the link I posted Recursion Jan 2016 #71
Thanks, I must have scrolled by it. Autumn Jan 2016 #73
Nah, it was just a straw man argument dreamt up by some pseudo intellectual shill tularetom Jan 2016 #28
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #30
She doesn't have to have a position on reparations. Same goes for Autumn Jan 2016 #32
at least she doesn't support calling the president a piece of shit JI7 Jan 2016 #33
she probably did when he beat her grasswire Jan 2016 #61
but not the level of calling him a piece of shit and defending it JI7 Jan 2016 #70
Why would it matter? Sanders has been against issues that many on the left Jefferson23 Jan 2016 #39
Like what?! I've not heard any pragmatism from him on too many issues uponit7771 Jan 2016 #76
Guns and foreign policy. He is not Kucinich on foreign policy..Sanders is no hawk, but Jefferson23 Jan 2016 #89
Reparations for what? Reter Jan 2016 #42
Why include anything we see as justice..Republicans are on the record for not being Jefferson23 Jan 2016 #46
well, we could wait ... if Bernie hadn't been attacked on it recently. grasswire Jan 2016 #62
We won't talk about it before or after the election, which was Coates's point Recursion Jan 2016 #66
I do not in any way support reparations Tarc Jan 2016 #67
I hope that she joins with Bernie in opposing them. Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #69
Hillary isn't running as a "Revolutionary" the way Sanders is. KittyWampus Jan 2016 #72
What a cop out response Lawud Jan 2016 #77
LOL! merrily Jan 2016 #82
If people actually care about reparations they should want to hear from all the candiates. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #78
It is my understanding that Hillary's position, BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #87
Make sure you watch this video concerning Hillary's position... jillan Jan 2016 #90
 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
3. Of course she hasn't. Thought this article was a thoughtful reminder of Clinton positions.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jan 2016

It's entitled "Hillary Clinton is not the Second Coming of Harriet Tubman".

http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/hillary-clinton-not-second-coming-harriet-tubman

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
4. She's not the one calling for unicorns from congress !! False equivalency at best, If HRC said she
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jan 2016

... didn't think it was probable then I'm OK with that.

But don't say impossible issues like SP are probable because of revolution but reparations aren't because its too hard

That's not being consistent

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
10. You would be wrong on all counts. Not being consistent is insisting that Bernie call for reparations
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:24 PM
Jan 2016

but Hillary doesn't have to worry her pretty little campaign about that. SP or Medicare for All is very popular with people when the benefits are explained to them, reparations aren't. Ask Obama. Sanders has never called for unicorns from congress or anyone else. Sanders has called for the people to stand with him, as he stand with them.

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
12. She doesn't, she's not proffering we pass impossible bills without the votes from congress!!! Sander
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:27 PM
Jan 2016

... is because he has some plan to influence a historically GOP gerrymandered congress who has shown it could give a damn what people think.

The popularity with people or vise versa isn't a reason NOT to do whats right when the improbable is being pushed anyway!!

The everything is possible but "that" issue is NOT being consistent at all

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
17. Neither is Bernie proffering we pass impossible bills without the votes from congress.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jan 2016

if you had ever heard anything he has ever said you would know that but you pass out these silly half truth sound bites like they are pearls of wisdom from the media and Hillary's operatives like they actually make sense. The popularity with people is a damn good fucking reason TO TRY to do the improbable. The improbable has never been done until someone does it.

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
35. Yes he is!! OMG, is anyone listening to each other?! The GOP Gerrymandered congress is NOT
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:41 PM
Jan 2016

... going to pass anything!!

Where the hell have people been in the last couple of years

THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE PEOPLE!!!!

Sanders has put up no plan to make them... Hillary has said she'll go around them with unilateral decisions ... Sanders will soon follow

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
40. I'm listening to how Bernie says he will attempt to get things through.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:49 PM
Jan 2016

I'm also listening to Hillary saying we can't do that. Nice try, Sanders has never followed Hillary, she is too busy borrowing from him.

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
41. I have too and its like Sanders has been missing for the last 6 years and doesn't udnerstand
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jan 2016

... the effects of gerrymandered !!!

If 8 billion people felt you should donate money to HRCs campaign would you?

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
43. Sanders very much understand how things work, including gerrymandering.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:07 PM
Jan 2016

I signed up to make a monthly donation to Bernie's campaign. I wouldn't give Hillary one red cent the word of the day is UNICORNS!

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
47. But if 8 billion people wanted you to you would right? I mean, its a popular thing to do...
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:16 PM
Jan 2016

... and by Sanders logic that should influence you.

The GOP in congress has the same pressure from the people; none... like you would in that example the GOP congress doesn't have to care no matter how popular the measure is... they're not going to move... they don't have to

That is the effect of a gerrymandered congress

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
49. You are NOT even making sense so I will just say have a nice day and be done with this.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:18 PM
Jan 2016

You keep harping on the same old thing and ignore what I say so this is a waste of time.

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
56. If you try to make sense of the topic at hand I may decide to respond to you but as it stands this
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:26 PM
Jan 2016

is my last reply to you.

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
57. What I posted made perfect sense, there's no one is going to influence you to do anything you
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:29 PM
Jan 2016

... don't have to do and the same goes towards the gerrymandered GOP congress !!!

Sanders doesn't have a plan to MAKE them do anything, they don't give a damn about "revolution"

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
84. wow, what bullshit. this is typical of the hill people.......No we can't!!!! what a pathetic motto.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:53 AM
Jan 2016

hillary will never be president

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
85. No we can't all jump to the moon or get a gerrymandered GOP congress to care about America
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:59 AM
Jan 2016

... that's not bullshit that's reality.

Dems used to like reality

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
5. Is there any support
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:21 PM
Jan 2016

For reparations? I mean, other than a few fringe Democrats I don't think this would ever happen.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
6. no, because she's "the X candidate" so she doesn't have to prove herself
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:21 PM
Jan 2016

(legal notice: X may vary depending on audience)

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
15. You guys don't care a whit about reparations
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:29 PM
Jan 2016

If you did you'd want to know all the candidates' positions, instead of contriving moronic distinctions to single out one. Disgusting.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
51. Why?
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:22 PM
Jan 2016

I don't have a strong opinion and wouldn't without studying the pros and cons. What I can say definitively, is I wouldn't sink low enough to run this nonsense play on Hillary.

oasis

(49,388 posts)
68. The first sentence wisdom of post# 51 suits me as well.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:34 PM
Jan 2016

However, I loved Bernie's tap dance on the subject on today's Meet the Press.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
54. If you excuse our current (AA) president and candidate Clinton from the same scrutiny
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:24 PM
Jan 2016

maybe you care less than you think.

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
86. They're not fighting against their own establishment as a revolutionary Sanders is, I'd accept the..
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 07:01 AM
Jan 2016

... answer as something they don't want to fight right now but not going to accept revolution with asterisks by it

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
44. You're right
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:09 PM
Jan 2016

Single payer, free college and $15 minimum wage?

You're right.

Those aren't invisible flying unicorns. Those are invisible flying pink unicorns.

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
50. They either don't understand how congress works, don't understand the effects of gerrymandering
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:20 PM
Jan 2016

...or are just going to support someone who relates to their anger only.

As long as Sanders stands up and growls and spits at the GOP and then claims he tried they'd be happy...

Progress!?

Nah, don't need that crap

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
55. Here ya go.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:25 PM
Jan 2016

And I'll put up my knowledge about gerrymandering and anything else political against yours any day.

It's about integrity, an alien concept to Hillary and people like her.

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
58. Then you know damn well there is not consequence to the GOP burning down a pediatric
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:33 PM
Jan 2016

... oncology ward on prime time tv, they don't HAVE to give a damn about Sanders "revolution" cause there's nothing that's going to get them out of their seats.

Question: What would have to be the MINIMUM avg increase in dem votes to get the GOP out of their gerrymandered districts?!

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
59. Again, the GOP HISTORICALLY gerrymandered congress doesn't have to give a damn about culture, shifts
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:40 PM
Jan 2016

... revolution or what people think.

And we're not asking for more integrity, Sanders has enough and so does HRC...

People are asking for a WORKABLE plan... "culture shift" (whatever that means) is not a workable plan to overcome a GOP congress that doesn't answer to the people who voted for them not less the people who didn't.

The majority of the country has been for common sense gun reforms FOR YEARS and the GOP congress could give a shit about that.

Talk about it, march about it, "Bully Pulpit" about all you want and they're ARE NOT GOING TO SHIFT!!



Because they don't have to...



Question: Would you start send donations to HRCs campaign IF... 250 million Americans supported and thought it was a good idea?

regards

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
9. Yes. Clinton has a clear position and her campaign have been adamant about it. Have you not heard
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:23 PM
Jan 2016

them say "Sanders is wrong" a thousand times? That's their position.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
11. "She doesn't have to because she's not calling for a political revolution!"
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:24 PM
Jan 2016

Or some such stupidity. Because the only read of the word revolution is "confiscation of personal property and redistribution, comrade!"

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
18. truly fucking batshit! it's interesting what that bunch considers "unicorns".
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:36 PM
Jan 2016

They show their true colors!

uponit7771

(90,346 posts)
74. Which is a rational expectation, she's not calling for the improbable to happen because of whatever
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:11 AM
Jan 2016

... factors he said they would happen through this congress.

That's not her position,

Revolution with an asterisk beside it is .... not revolutionary

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
81. If you know then what is her opinion? Surely you've researched it since it's so important to you.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:35 AM
Jan 2016

And if it's identical to Bernie's then by definition his position is also reasonable.

Holding liberals to different standards is typically a right wing tactic.

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
29. Got it.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jan 2016

Pavlovian. Sorry - not this time.

Bernie or bust. With all due respect: To believe anything that HRC says is to believe in flying unicorns. One can watch her debate herself by playing back her countless positions on every issue.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
16. I want to see her position on this and her COMPLETE 50 PAGE explanation of how she would implement
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:30 PM
Jan 2016

Reparations.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
22. She probably laughed. It goes without saying she supported them if she supported Barry Goldwater...
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:45 PM
Jan 2016

... now doesn't it?

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
23. Probably hasn't been asked
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:45 PM
Jan 2016

O'Malley has a detailed plan to revitalize American cities with a heavy emphasis an public transportation - gets the still redlined folks out to the suburbs where the jobs are.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
24. Hillary doesn't live in a fantasy world. Bernie does.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:49 PM
Jan 2016

The question is, why does Bernie's fantasy world include single payer and free college, but not reparations?

Very telling that nobody even tries to answer.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
25. What a ridiculous post
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:00 PM
Jan 2016

Absolutely astounding how nonsensical some of the stuff you guys are coming out with is at this point.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
34. Yeah its all just unicorns..
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:38 PM
Jan 2016

Because the job of progressives is to sit and whine about how much the county sucks while the voting public stay at home leaving the Republicans to claim power. That's your stategy is it? Aim low and hope the GOP voters are as uninspired as the Democratic ones?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
27. She has, in a debate with Lazio
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:05 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Civil_Rights.htm

Q: Will you support reparations for African-Americans?
CLINTON: We have mental, emotional and psychological reparations to pay first. We have to admit that we haven’t always treated people in our own country fairly. We have some issues that we have to address when it comes to racial justice right now. I’m willing to work hard to be a strong advocate for Civil Rights and human rights here at home and around the world. I want to do everything I can to make sure that the programs and policies that have helped generations of African-Americans have a better life in this country continue. I think we should be focused on the present and on the future. We owe an apology to African-Americans for hundreds of years of slavery.

Qutzupalotl

(14,313 posts)
31. I don't see a clear answer in her response.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:27 PM
Jan 2016

There is an implication ("to pay first&quot that she would eventually pay, but she doesn't come right out and say it. The rest of her answer is feel-good pablum that everyone believes. If she's dancing that hard, I think the answer must be no.

Vinca

(50,273 posts)
36. That remark is being "for" reparations while also being "against" them.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:43 PM
Jan 2016

"Mental, emotional and psychological reparations" doesn't = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ from the government to atone for previous sins. That's probably the most politically thought out statement I've ever read.

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
38. I was not aware that taking a stand on an apology owed is a stand on reparations, at least not the
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:45 PM
Jan 2016

payment of reparations which seems to be a big deal that Bernie hasn't yet satisfied. Do you by chance have a direct link to your quoted excerpt? I couldn't find that Q&A at your link and I wanted to know if she will support reparations after an apology for mental, emotional and psychological stress since in that excerpt her stand seems to be about an apology for mental, emotional and psychological stress and then goes in another direction.

Bernie did give a direct answer

http://fusion.net/video/255113/bernie-sanders-reparations-answer-iowa-forum/

“It's likelihood of getting through Congress is nil,” he told Fusion in an interview. “Second of all, I think it would be very divisive

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
71. The transcript is at the link I posted
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 12:30 AM
Jan 2016

You have to scroll down past "gender equality"

I don't think it was a particularly good answer on her part; I just posted it as a factual response to the OP's question.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
28. Nah, it was just a straw man argument dreamt up by some pseudo intellectual shill
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:05 PM
Jan 2016

to embarrass Sanders. Question is who put them up to it.

Response to grasswire (Original post)

Autumn

(45,096 posts)
32. She doesn't have to have a position on reparations. Same goes for
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:27 PM
Jan 2016

removing BLM activists from her events and countless other double standards. Just "Not Good Enough Bernie" needs to explain.

JI7

(89,250 posts)
70. but not the level of calling him a piece of shit and defending it
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 12:27 AM
Jan 2016

as many others here have done.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
39. Why would it matter? Sanders has been against issues that many on the left
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:47 PM
Jan 2016

would rather he be for but he hasn't been.

His main issue is to unravel a corrupt election system, which regardless
of your political views, you can't fight back with equal measure. Once
you achieve that goal, Americans have the opportunity to fight for what
they want with a better chance of a positive outcome.

Who else has made this commitment to do that for the long haul? No one else.

He has been sounding the alarm to work for that and saying he alone
can't accomplish it...political activism involves much more time and effort
than showing up to vote.

The author of the OP in question suggests what, Sanders doesn't know/won't
commit to what a political revolution involves if he leaves out reparations?

What is being implied here...he is not honest, not interested in the black
community, or he's just as clueless as Clinton?




Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
89. Guns and foreign policy. He is not Kucinich on foreign policy..Sanders is no hawk, but
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 11:02 AM
Jan 2016

I leave you to compare the two to get an idea of what I mean.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
42. Reparations for what?
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:03 PM
Jan 2016

Anyone who says yes will lose 49 states. Can we please wait until after the election to talk about this?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
46. Why include anything we see as justice..Republicans are on the record for not being
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 07:09 PM
Jan 2016

for anything. This constant fear of not staking positions is absurd.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
62. well, we could wait ... if Bernie hadn't been attacked on it recently.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jan 2016

It's just odd that Bernie is singled out to corner on this issue, while apparently no one cares what Hillary thinks.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
66. We won't talk about it before or after the election, which was Coates's point
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 09:50 PM
Jan 2016

It's not a subject white liberals are willing to discuss. That was his entire point.

And, in terms of "for what", a good start is racist FHA and USDA loan policies in the 1950s and 1960s.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
78. If people actually care about reparations they should want to hear from all the candiates.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:27 AM
Jan 2016

Insisting that only one candidate's opinion is important makes it look like certain supporters are just exploiting the issue to score points against their opponents.

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
87. It is my understanding that Hillary's position,
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 07:55 AM
Jan 2016

that of Bernie, and that of President Obama are all more or less the same.

I have my own thoughts about this and have stated them in the AA Forum. In doing so, I have not smeared or tried to smear ANY one of the Dem candidates on this or any other issue.



jillan

(39,451 posts)
90. Make sure you watch this video concerning Hillary's position...
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 02:26 PM
Jan 2016

Look for where it says Chris Hayes interviews Ta-Nehisi Coates.
I almost fell off of my chair when this interview was on. And then I started yelling at my tv ( something I am known for on ocassion lol)




http://www.msnbc.com/all

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Has Hillary stated a posi...