Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:57 AM Jan 2016

O'Malley:A bargain shopper like no other: or how to pay $61 for chairs taxpayers bought for $6,200.

I read O'Malley purchased a set of 4 chairs from the gov mansion for $61 (with an original cost of $6,200). Wow, I would think the state could have gotten more at a yard sale (or left them in the gov mansion so the taxpayers did not have to purchase new furniture).

Yeah, I know the ethics committee controlled by the Democrats said it was okay but the Repub. state prosecutor is looking at it and the other furniture purchases. It's sad that neither party seems to want to hold their own members accountable. But saying the other side does it too is not a valid excuse.

Sad indeed.

O’Malley purchase of furniture from mansion being probed by prosecutor

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/county-states-attorney-investigating-omalley-furniture-purchase/2016/01/14/b34646b2-bb24-11e5-829c-26ffb874a18d_story.html

Thanks to what looks like a generous interpretation of state rules, by some pliable state officials, Mr. O’Malley, a Democrat who left office in January, was allowed to purchase much of the governor’s mansion’s residential furniture — 54?pieces from the family’s bedrooms and living rooms — for the attractive price of $9,638; the original price of those items, billed to taxpayers, was $62,000.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/martin-omalley-bargain-shopper/2015/09/01/fe2803c8-50ee-11e5-933e-7d06c647a395_story.html?tid=a_inl

The O’Malley shopping spree at the governor’s mansion — a $750 chest snagged for $7.50; an $892 table snapped up for $8.93; a set of four chairs, originally $6,200 for $61 — has now been referred to the state Ethics Commission. Whatever the outcome, the verdict is clear: It reflects exactly the sense of entitlement on the part of public officials that turns voters’ stomachs.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
O'Malley:A bargain shopper like no other: or how to pay $61 for chairs taxpayers bought for $6,200. (Original Post) Skwmom Jan 2016 OP
Beating a dead horse? n/t Smarmie Doofus Jan 2016 #1
Consider the mood of the electorate, I would reconsider that proposition.... Skwmom Jan 2016 #5
The new governor wasn't going to keep the furniture Orangepeel Jan 2016 #2
Doesn't matter exboyfil Jan 2016 #3
Agree. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #4
It isn't unethical to accept a benefit offered by your employer Orangepeel Jan 2016 #6
That furniture was state property. Perhaps for less than it might get at auction? Skwmom Jan 2016 #7
not like bernie who continuously votes for funding and perpetuating our endless wars lol nt msongs Jan 2016 #8
Supporting the troops is a bad thing? Fumesucker Jan 2016 #9

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
3. Doesn't matter
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:09 AM
Jan 2016

The furniture should have gone to a public auction. That is what happens in the companies I have worked for. Employees have an inside track by knowing what is going to auction, but the employees and general public are equal bidders for the items. It seems all the elites act in this fashion. I knew as a young engineer that you have a fiduciary duty to your employer. A state employee/public servant should be at least as ethical especially those in leadership positions.

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)
6. It isn't unethical to accept a benefit offered by your employer
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:47 AM
Jan 2016

The State pays governors a salary. It subsidizes their family's health insurance. It doesn't charge them rent to live in the mansion. It allows them to buy the furniture they've been using for years as they leave office for, perhaps, less than it might get at an auction.

It isn't secret and the state has a process to get a referendum by petition. If people think the governor should get less, they should make it so.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
7. That furniture was state property. Perhaps for less than it might get at auction?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 02:28 AM
Jan 2016

You can really add a qualifier with a straight face?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»O'Malley:A bargain shoppe...