Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
189 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does Sen. Sanders believe there should be private property? (Original Post) arely staircase Jan 2016 OP
Red bait much? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #1
So you don't know. arely staircase Jan 2016 #8
YARGLE BARGLE! HAMMER AND SICKLE! BERNIE'S GONNA TAKE MAH STUFF!!1! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #11
That picture is awesome! n/t Goblinmonger Jan 2016 #23
This one is cool too: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #26
I hear he's going to negotiate with Russia Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #37
Ha! Nice. Seriously, I'd be embarrassed to ask a question like that. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #40
What would he nationalize? arely staircase Jan 2016 #102
I'll take logical fallacies for $500, Alex. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #108
If the answer is nothing he isn't a socialist. arely staircase Jan 2016 #110
You didn't watch the instructional video someone was nice enough to post, did you? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #117
Ah, I think the confusion is over the meaning of the word "socialist", then. cheapdate Jan 2016 #133
I associate it with government or at least cooperative ownership arely staircase Jan 2016 #135
I think many, but not all, people use it more loosely today. n/t cheapdate Jan 2016 #138
Hint: ownership is always "a bundle rights" kristopher Jan 2016 #184
Yeah I took property law. arely staircase Jan 2016 #185
Then there are no excuses for your statements and they become sheer demagoguery kristopher Jan 2016 #188
You don't know what you are talking about. kristopher Jan 2016 #180
Where you on a debate team? arely staircase Jan 2016 #186
I'm just stating a self-evident fact... kristopher Jan 2016 #187
What do you think, hm? Give it a shot. ancianita Jan 2016 #136
Me? I have no fucking idea. But if it is nothing arely staircase Jan 2016 #150
Or maybe they got all that sorted out a while back and your OP seems tedious. ancianita Jan 2016 #159
Berniebronies! frylock Jan 2016 #61
I think I'm going to make this one my avatar: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #64
Very stately. I like it! frylock Jan 2016 #72
It's not MLP without Derpy! nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #89
That should really convince a lot of swing voters in a general arely staircase Jan 2016 #95
OH NOES! Posting brony pics on DU will affect voters in the GE??? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #98
Again. Perfect for those moderate suburban swing voters. arely staircase Jan 2016 #101
"Im sure rhey will get whatever you are trying to say." beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #103
So what would he nationalize? arely staircase Jan 2016 #104
See post #108. And thanks for playing! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #111
Unresponsive arely staircase Jan 2016 #112
You were done the minute you hit send and posted this thread, arely. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #116
I think he should nationalize the government. immoderate Jan 2016 #132
You win the thread. nt arely staircase Jan 2016 #152
You think your question is what keeps "swing" voters up at night? ancianita Jan 2016 #137
No. Because they don't know who Sanders is. arely staircase Jan 2016 #153
You sound as if you haven't been on here much. Or you'd already know what you're asking for. ancianita Jan 2016 #162
You read. arely staircase Jan 2016 #165
You reached out with an OP. Make the first attempt. BTW, that's not enough to use for Bernie. ancianita Jan 2016 #166
Yes and nobody wants to touch that op arely staircase Jan 2016 #167
Then you've not read your own thread. You've gotten parameters, definitions and links. Use them. ancianita Jan 2016 #168
Do you disagree with Busky's definition? nt arely staircase Jan 2016 #169
It's 16 years old. One definition isn't definitive; one definition never settles arguments in the ancianita Jan 2016 #176
I do agree with Busky. arely staircase Jan 2016 #177
Yep. But the 'face' states put on internationally assigns a certain value to their ancianita Jan 2016 #179
Swing voters are lazy or without long term interest in the country.The US is awash in information ancianita Jan 2016 #163
STRAWMAN. No one is suggesting you "shut up". It's the Conservative Wing rhett o rick Jan 2016 #79
^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #80
This arely staircase Jan 2016 #171
Yes they have. arely staircase Jan 2016 #170
No. Just shut up. elias49 Jan 2016 #97
What the fuck is this shit? Shit question. nt thereismore Jan 2016 #2
Ridiculous and absurd flame bait. Punkingal Jan 2016 #3
Why do you make that bizarre claim? scscholar Jan 2016 #82
What would he nationalize? arely staircase Jan 2016 #107
health insurance. serious answer. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #182
Wow! This is just bull. Perhaps you should read up on the topic before going all commie. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #4
What would he nationalize? arely staircase Jan 2016 #109
Again, read up on the topic, instead of being spoon-fed bits and pieces. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #123
Dude, I have a degree in political science. arely staircase Jan 2016 #154
And there's always one person who graduates at the bottom of the class... (eom) mak3cats Jan 2016 #157
Here. Read. arely staircase Jan 2016 #161
I'm in univ. for more Poli-Sci. Perhaps you need a refresher because nuanced thought escapes you. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #172
Do you agree with Busky's definition? arely staircase Jan 2016 #173
No--A blend of Regulated Capitalism, Pol. Democracy, and elements of a Welfare State (Which US is). TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #174
The US is not a socialist country. It just isn't arely staircase Jan 2016 #175
Keep obfuscating. I didn't say it was Socialist, I said it's a Capitalist/Socialist hybrid. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #189
Start here Paulie Jan 2016 #5
You beat me to it..... daleanime Jan 2016 #35
You're making the common assumption that the OP is asking an honest question and seeks an answer :) arcane1 Jan 2016 #91
WTF? EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #6
No komrad pinebox Jan 2016 #7
LOL, This weekend should be fun. 'Tis the silly season. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #9
AAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!1!!eleven!!1 Krytan11c Jan 2016 #10
New meme alert. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #12
Recycled actually n/t Krytan11c Jan 2016 #13
Ah, good fertilizer. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #18
Yup Krytan11c Jan 2016 #20
Naw they started calling him a commie months ago. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #17
I know - I've just never seen them desperate enough to single out "private property"! CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #25
Archie Bunker is right! One just got an op hidden for actually calling Bernie a "commie". beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #29
Panic Old Codger Jan 2016 #31
NOPE Kalidurga Jan 2016 #14
FTW-I like the cut of your jib, comrade! - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #86
What's 'spalini? Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #15
I think the poster is noodling pretty hard to figure this on out tk2kewl Jan 2016 #38
I was thinking spumoni. But that's because I like ice cream. aidbo Jan 2016 #44
Lucky for you, I didn't have a mouth full of it Bernin4U Jan 2016 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author Bernin4U Jan 2016 #56
Your incendiary ? is like asking: Does Hillary think non-millionaires have the right to vote nt amborin Jan 2016 #16
Seriously ??? SamKnause Jan 2016 #19
Joseph McCarthy? That you? Goblinmonger Jan 2016 #21
Where did these people go to school? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #24
One would think. Goblinmonger Jan 2016 #49
Alert Results Act_of_Reparation Jan 2016 #63
Uh oh, someone has to sit in the corner for 24 hours. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #66
Another chickenshit alert fails miserably. And I think I'm in love with Juror #4 arcane1 Jan 2016 #92
Me too! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #100
Clearly you are doing something right, and it's hitting a sensitive, unprotected nerve. arcane1 Jan 2016 #105
Have you seen these? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #115
I LOVE the first one!!! arcane1 Jan 2016 #120
Now, now. Don't be so hard on them. They're breaking in a new bunch of swarmers. hedda_foil Jan 2016 #128
Yeah, the Nordic nations, who Bernie likes, are renowned for their gulags brentspeak Jan 2016 #22
This is why I avoid Ikea. redwitch Jan 2016 #28
You'd think that such a profitable company VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #130
. Guy Whitey Corngood Jan 2016 #155
Does he own a house? democrank Jan 2016 #27
Why yes he does! redwitch Jan 2016 #30
Mega-dittos, Rush!! m-lekktor Jan 2016 #32
Winner! hueymahl Jan 2016 #122
does hillary believe that anyone but the 1% should own property? restorefreedom Jan 2016 #33
Communism is the only system I'm aware of where private property is prohibited. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #34
Yes. GeorgeGist Jan 2016 #36
Why, yes; he does. But you knew that. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #39
Everyone knows that Sanders is going to have to explain his philosophy ShrimpPoboy Jan 2016 #41
Republican Lite jalan48 Jan 2016 #42
red bait fail G_j Jan 2016 #43
I first became suspicious of Bernie Sanders during the physical act of love, Mandrake DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #45
Awesome Strangelove reference. Much appreciated! - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #87
We Clinton supporters are better than that...Of course Senator Sanders believes in private property. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #46
"We Clinton supporters are better than that"? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #50
I am disappointed in this thread...It's silly... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #53
There are many, many posts like this and worse from Clinton cali Jan 2016 #71
What this OP wasn't hidden? INdemo Jan 2016 #47
Nah. When an OP fails spectacularly, DU tends to let it stand. SMC22307 Jan 2016 #183
You appear to confuse "Private Property" with the "ownership of the means of production." Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #48
Wow. On DU. Really? ljm2002 Jan 2016 #51
I'm a Hillary supporter and this is pure flame bait. musicblind Jan 2016 #52
Well then, it certainly served its purpose! delrem Jan 2016 #148
May I reframe your question? Thank you, I will. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #55
Wait, are youa repub troll Bernin4U Jan 2016 #57
'spalini you-self. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2016 #67
! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #81
Ignorance run amok? Some? RiverLover Jan 2016 #58
No, Comrade, But You Will LOVE SDJay Jan 2016 #59
WOLVERINES!!1 frylock Jan 2016 #60
No. You are simply going to forfeit everything you own. (Just you, no one else.) Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #62
The USA is older than Socialism Half-Century Man Jan 2016 #65
How on earth can you not know the answer to that? Either you're a poorly cali Jan 2016 #68
There were two Alerts sent on this OP INdemo Jan 2016 #69
I think so. treestar Jan 2016 #70
What a ridiculous post. Vinca Jan 2016 #73
If you really wanted to know the answer, you could do an sinkingfeeling Jan 2016 #74
I don't know what worries me more-- QC Jan 2016 #75
So tired of your ugly antics ... Trajan Jan 2016 #76
Didn't I just say y'all Clintonites had the Red Scare blinders up just last night? VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #77
Does Hillary believe people should not lose floriduck Jan 2016 #78
No He's gonna take it all so he can say" Get the fuck off my lawn" Autumn Jan 2016 #83
Do you even know the difference between what Marxists call "private property" and KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #84
uh Yes... hoosierlib Jan 2016 #85
didnt know this was freerepublic.com Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #88
Wow, the phony questions get more brainless by the day. arcane1 Jan 2016 #90
The fuck does this even mean? Arkana Jan 2016 #93
SUCK OF THE DAY! Ron Green Jan 2016 #94
SOSHIALISM!!!1!!!!!!11!!! Romulox Jan 2016 #96
You must be joking whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #99
Colonel Flagg? Is that you? GoneFishin Jan 2016 #106
Ha! DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #113
LOL. GoneFishin Jan 2016 #118
LOLOLOL! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #119
Colonel Flagg was hilarious! neverforget Jan 2016 #145
Careful, or he'll drop a grenade down your shorts. GoneFishin Jan 2016 #146
This post tells me that Hillary HQ is in complete panic, telling their people to say ANYTHING. reformist2 Jan 2016 #114
No commies here Mike__M Jan 2016 #121
OMG! You are awesome Heddi Jan 2016 #178
This is more trash from you. RobertEarl Jan 2016 #124
Of course he does - he owns a house in Burlington VT karynnj Jan 2016 #125
No, and We have to wear Sickle and Hammer . orpupilofnature57 Jan 2016 #126
I dont know, but anyone who thinks it thru and believes there should be, isnt randys1 Jan 2016 #127
yes Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #129
Oh, come on. Sanders might not be my first choice, but I sure don't care about that. Hoyt Jan 2016 #131
Yes. nt SusanCalvin Jan 2016 #134
He's going to line you up at gunpoint, confiscate all your stuff, delrem Jan 2016 #142
. SusanCalvin Jan 2016 #144
If you consider Gulags to be private property TheFarS1de Jan 2016 #139
totally OT but I love that gif of Sanders in the rock band lol nt steve2470 Jan 2016 #149
Bernie Sanders wants the state to confiscate your dog! delrem Jan 2016 #140
Come on BainsBane Jan 2016 #141
All your property belongs to us comrade neverforget Jan 2016 #143
My entire response has been redacted. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #147
Huh, I looked up "red bait" and found this: Oilwellian Jan 2016 #151
Dumb. Starry Messenger Jan 2016 #156
Does Hillary believe in killing Iraqi babies? she must, since she voted for a war that KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #158
Naive right wing garbage AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #160
He is a pragmatic Socialist now? PowerToThePeople Jan 2016 #164
Stop this McCarthyist shit. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #181

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
40. Ha! Nice. Seriously, I'd be embarrassed to ask a question like that.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:22 PM
Jan 2016

Very brave of the op to admit they don't know what communism is. Someone did post an informative video, let's hope the op watches it.


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
108. I'll take logical fallacies for $500, Alex.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jan 2016
Loaded question

A loaded question is a logical fallacy that occurs when statements or questions are designed to confuse listeners into tacitly accepting something (which isn't obviously clear in the question) as true.

Loaded questions come in two forms.

[edit]Trick questions

Trick questions force the respondent to either admit to an opinion or fact they do not share, or deny a factual premise. The most famous example of a trick question like this is: "When did you stop beating your wife?" In this form, an answer that does not directly refute the premise of the question (e.g. "I've never married" or "I've never beaten my wife.&quot admits the truth in it, implicitly at least.[1] An example of forced opinion: "So, you are going to vote for that lazy Obama?" If one says yes, they admit to Obama being lazy, if they say no, they are lying about voting. Another option would be to reply in a way that implicitly rejects the loaded language by substituting more neutral language: "I am going to vote for Obama." An example of forced fact: "So you are one of those god-denying evolutionists?" The interrogee may think evolution is a fact, but also could be, say, a Christian.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Loaded_question

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
110. If the answer is nothing he isn't a socialist.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:02 PM
Jan 2016

What would he want nationalized. Banks? Major industries? What?

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
133. Ah, I think the confusion is over the meaning of the word "socialist", then.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:58 PM
Jan 2016

Your working definition -- one who would nationalize one or more industries -- ignores the way the word is frequently used today to describe states with things like a generous safety net, generous public benefits like free health care and education, and strong regulations and oversight of business.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
135. I associate it with government or at least cooperative ownership
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

of major industries. The things you describe as a believer in a generous social safety net, strong environmental/labor regulation makes one a progressive/liberal or in Europe a Social Democrat. But not a Democratic Socialist. Or any kind of socialist. I think my working definitions are fine and you are wrong but thanks for the civility.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
184. Hint: ownership is always "a bundle rights"
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 06:13 PM
Jan 2016

Is it necessary to exercise day to day control in order to be the beneficiary of some portion of the rights associated with ownership?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
185. Yeah I took property law.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 06:17 PM
Jan 2016

My year of law school. So I know just enough law to be dangerous. Remember the bundle of rights though and made a B in the class.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
188. Then there are no excuses for your statements and they become sheer demagoguery
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 06:37 PM
Jan 2016

Demagoguery is an appeal to people that plays on their emotions and prejudices rather than on their rational side. Demagoguery is a manipulative approach — often associated with dictators and sleazy politicians — that appeals to the worst nature of people.
demagoguery - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com
https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/demagoguery

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
180. You don't know what you are talking about.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 05:45 PM
Jan 2016

You have a kindergarten level of understanding on this topic.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
187. I'm just stating a self-evident fact...
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 06:35 PM
Jan 2016

...derive from the most charitable interpretation of your remarks.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
150. Me? I have no fucking idea. But if it is nothing
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:08 AM
Jan 2016

he isn't a socialist. He should at least be for cooperatives of industry with labor and capitaliats sharing ownerahip. I am beginning to think his supporters don't know what a socoalist is. They seem to think it ia just a really liberal person.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
95. That should really convince a lot of swing voters in a general
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:40 PM
Jan 2016

Totally put their minds at ease. Like most of the predictable responses here.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
98. OH NOES! Posting brony pics on DU will affect voters in the GE???
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:47 PM
Jan 2016

Just imagine what will happen when I invoke Chairman Meow:


arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
101. Again. Perfect for those moderate suburban swing voters.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jan 2016

Im sure rhey will get whatever you are trying to say.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
103. "Im sure rhey will get whatever you are trying to say."
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:54 PM
Jan 2016

You're certainly not getting it. But I have faith, hang in there.




beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
116. You were done the minute you hit send and posted this thread, arely.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:07 PM
Jan 2016

You just didn't realize it.

I rec'd your thread, btw - it's a scream!

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
153. No. Because they don't know who Sanders is.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 10:54 AM
Jan 2016

But should he be our nominee, better answers than "red baiter! 1! 1" had better be forthcoming.

ancianita

(36,137 posts)
162. You sound as if you haven't been on here much. Or you'd already know what you're asking for.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jan 2016

You want to try http://www.ontheissues.org/Bernie_Sanders.htm

or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders

or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism

or are you actually asking for more of an elevator pitch.

Read, summarize for yourself.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
165. You read.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:57 PM
Jan 2016

Busky, Donald F. (July 20, 2000). Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey. Praeger. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0275968861. Democratic socialism is the wing of the socialist movement that combines a belief in a socially owned economy with that of political democracy. Sometimes simply called socialism, more often than not, the adjective democratic is added by democratic socialists to attempt to distinguish themselves from Communists who also call themselves socialists...democratic socialists wish to emphasize by their name that they disagree strongly with the Marxist-Leninist brand of socialism.

And summarize

ancianita

(36,137 posts)
166. You reached out with an OP. Make the first attempt. BTW, that's not enough to use for Bernie.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:58 PM
Jan 2016

Try again.

ancianita

(36,137 posts)
176. It's 16 years old. One definition isn't definitive; one definition never settles arguments in the
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:09 PM
Jan 2016

dynamic of politics and history.

Busky's fine. In recent history Socialists have tried to distinguish themselves from Communists, their obvious context being the mass hysteria over all things 'red,' and the lingering memory of stigmatizing witch hunts that our Congress staged.

You presented the definition. So I conclude that you also agree with Busky.

I see Capitalism's strengths and weaknesses played out beside the Communist Chinese government. It's the 'ownership' state that's still around. Democracies can opt to become socialist or communist because the people still have a structural mechanism for opting out of a structure that becomes too authoritarian. Not so in theocracies or monarchies.

Are you done here?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
177. I do agree with Busky.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jan 2016

And I have never thought for a second Sanders is a Marxist-Lenninist or any other form of authoritarian. Frankly I think he is more a social democrat than a socialist, or at least his platform for president is.

As for Chinese Communism, I mean, they were never really in a state of communism by the Marxist defition and they aren't even very socialist now. More of a mixed economy with an authoritarian government. No?

ancianita

(36,137 posts)
179. Yep. But the 'face' states put on internationally assigns a certain value to their
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:36 PM
Jan 2016

official 'story'.

Is it all serious? To me, no. When believers get involved, it's a matter of life and death.

Land base resource competition is the serious stuff of states -- extraction, energy, currencies. The politics is just the easy or hard means by which landbase resources get turned into symbols of value exchange.

Whole swaths of humanity ignore all this and run their own economies. The only scary things to humans these days is needless war and death.

ancianita

(36,137 posts)
163. Swing voters are lazy or without long term interest in the country.The US is awash in information
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:41 PM
Jan 2016

enough for any slice of the populace to no longer be "swing." They don't want to know the past political actions of the candidates or they would already. They'd line up the "likes/dislikes" of those actions and decide.

Truthfully, this "swing" idea is bullshit. It allows all manner of shananigans in the electronic rigging industry. Anyone calling themselves "swing" just like the cache of being open and skeptical when they actually don't care, don't do their homework, and will flip a coin in the voting booth.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
79. STRAWMAN. No one is suggesting you "shut up". It's the Conservative Wing
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:32 PM
Jan 2016

that wants to silence those that don't agree. You know, alert, lock, hide and ban. But you haven't even said anything. It's simple to insinuate but much harder to actually stand up and make an acquisition. And harder even yet to back up the insinuation. I think that insinuation via question is a conservative tactic, you know like Fox Noise ala. "Was Obama born in the USA?" "Is Sanders a Communist?".

If you really think that Sen Sanders is a communist (popular meme with conservatives), spit it out. Show some evidence. Make it a real discussion.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
170. Yes they have.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:47 PM
Jan 2016

This person has sent me three unsolicited and unanswered messages telling me to do just that.

INdemo
re: After your remark about Bernie Sanders and Communism you need to leave..
> And dont let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
> Go on back to your Freepers Forum

So, uh? yeah.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
109. What would he nationalize?
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jan 2016

Serios question. If the answer is nothing he isn't a socialist. If he is a socialist what would he nationalize.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
154. Dude, I have a degree in political science.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jan 2016

And I know that a socialist isn't just a super liberal. It meams that the workers should have control over their places of work. Often this takes the form of goverment ownership or cooperative ownership in which capital and labor share in the decision making. Just being for a social safety net and effective regulations is not socialism. It has become quite clear that many of his aupporters think a socialist os just a very liberal/left person. It is not.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
161. Here. Read.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jan 2016

Busky, Donald F. (July 20, 2000). Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey. Praeger. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0275968861. Democratic socialism is the wing of the socialist movement that combines a belief in a socially owned economy with that of political democracy. Sometimes simply called socialism, more often than not, the adjective democratic is added by democratic socialists to attempt to distinguish themselves from Communists who also call themselves socialists...democratic socialists wish to emphasize by their name that they disagree strongly with the Marxist-Leninist brand of socialism.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
173. Do you agree with Busky's definition?
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jan 2016

Busky, Donald F. (July 20, 2000). Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey. Praeger. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0275968861. Democratic socialism is the wing of the socialist movement that combines a belief in a socially owned economy with that of political democracy. Sometimes simply called socialism, more often than not, the adjective democratic is added by democratic socialists to attempt to distinguish themselves from Communists who also call themselves socialists...democratic socialists wish to emphasize by their name that they disagree strongly with the Marxist-Leninist brand of socialism.

TheBlackAdder

(28,220 posts)
174. No--A blend of Regulated Capitalism, Pol. Democracy, and elements of a Welfare State (Which US is).
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jan 2016

.


Besides, you fail to include what SBS states as HIS INTERPRETATION of Democratic Socialism.


The US already has a regulated capitalistic economy, political democracy (though now being restricted), and elements of a welfare state. This would just expand on some of the regulations that were in place in prior American governmental art, expand medical coverage beyond current art, and open up the voting elements which were restricted, expanded, and restricted though various states in American history.


Keep up with the obfuscation or blurred interpretations.

It's almost like conversing with an F. A. Hayek / Ayn Rand fan, so I don't waste much time doing so.


.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
175. The US is not a socialist country. It just isn't
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jan 2016

Amd no academic in the poly-sci field anywhere in the world thinks it is. There may be one or two pier reviewed profs somewhere who think that but they would be as rare as the handful of climate scientists who dont believe inan made climate change.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
91. You're making the common assumption that the OP is asking an honest question and seeks an answer :)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 03:20 PM
Jan 2016

Krytan11c

(271 posts)
10. AAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!1!!eleven!!1
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:51 AM
Jan 2016

HE IS A COMMIE.

Fuck this red baiting shit. It's so played out and ridiculous.

"If we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men." Edward Murrow

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
17. Naw they started calling him a commie months ago.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:55 AM
Jan 2016

What they don't realise is how badly that reflects on them.

What liberal doesn't know the difference between communism and democratic socialism?


CharlotteVale

(2,717 posts)
25. I know - I've just never seen them desperate enough to single out "private property"!
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:58 AM
Jan 2016

Reading their posts is like watching Archie Bunker sometimes.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
31. Panic
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:04 PM
Jan 2016

And desperation fill the air with the smell of bovine excrement, nothing substantial to discuss the red baiting will only get worse

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
14. NOPE
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:53 AM
Jan 2016

We are going to take all of your money and all of your assets and give them to people who haven't even finished high school and make you clean their toilets. Oh and some of them don't have teeth. And some of them have a bit of a drinking problem. And some of them will probably tell you that you missed a spot.

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
54. Lucky for you, I didn't have a mouth full of it
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:46 PM
Jan 2016

...when I read that. My surviving family members would not be too stoked.

Response to Bernin4U (Reply #54)

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
63. Alert Results
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:59 PM
Jan 2016

Yes, I said alert results. As in, someone actually alerted on your post. Enjoy:

On Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:15 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Where did these people go to school?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1089237

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

The remarks attack the reputation, education, and intelligence of the poster.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:24 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Frivolous Alert.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Unless I missed a meeting, it is not against the goddamned rules to question the intelligence of someone who posts something stupid. Quit wasting my time with your partisan hackery.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: mild compared to most lately...
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Wtf?

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
105. Clearly you are doing something right, and it's hitting a sensitive, unprotected nerve.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:56 PM
Jan 2016

I just realized we both have Cute-thulhu's in our posts

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
128. Now, now. Don't be so hard on them. They're breaking in a new bunch of swarmers.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:40 PM
Jan 2016

Baby swarmers, so to speak.

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
22. Yeah, the Nordic nations, who Bernie likes, are renowned for their gulags
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jan 2016

as well as their state-run, anti-profit, commissar-controlled companies such as Nokia, Volvo, and Electrolux. Just the other day at Ikea, I saw employees with name badges that read "Comrade John" and "Political Officer Mary". Could of sworn I could hear gunshots executing rich people out back.




redwitch

(14,947 posts)
30. Why yes he does!
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:03 PM
Jan 2016

And he was not too happy when Wall Street helped many Americans lose theirs. Someone should tell the person who started this obnoxious thread.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
34. Communism is the only system I'm aware of where private property is prohibited.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jan 2016

Is your question a backhanded way of asking if Bernie Sanders is a communist? Trying to ring that bell again are we? Senators Shaheen and Granholm doing it wasn't good enough? Or maybe it died away sooner than y'all thought it would?

ShrimpPoboy

(301 posts)
41. Everyone knows that Sanders is going to have to explain his philosophy
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:24 PM
Jan 2016

to the general public and distinguish it from the scary bits people think about when socialism is mentioned.

But on DU? Sad.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
45. I first became suspicious of Bernie Sanders during the physical act of love, Mandrake
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:33 PM
Jan 2016

He's trying to steal my essence. He's sapping my precious bodily fluids!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,714 posts)
46. We Clinton supporters are better than that...Of course Senator Sanders believes in private property.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jan 2016

The problem with the label socialist is it so freaking amorphous.


You have members here saying that if you support public roads you're a socialist. By that definition Adam Smith was a socialist.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
71. There are many, many posts like this and worse from Clinton
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:23 PM
Jan 2016

supporters here. It is a myth that Clinton supporters are civil. Many are many are not.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
48. You appear to confuse "Private Property" with the "ownership of the means of production."
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jan 2016

Each socialist and communist state handles private property and the ownership of the means of production in a different way.

Sanders owns a condominium in Vermont worth about $100,000.00, so it appears he has no problem with private property. He supported a bill to immunize Gun Manufacturers against law suits, so he doesn't have a strong aversion to private ownership of the means of production.

Even if elected, no Congress would ever legislate the US into a Socialist State. Your house, and Sander's Condominium, will remain comfortably in the hands of you and your banker. For that to change would require a complete rewrite of the Constitution.

Disclaimer: I do not support Sanders for President. I find this topic ridiculous. I suggest reading "The Communist Manifesto" and then compare and contrast that with Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations.

Come back, then, and we can discuss the differences between of private property and the ownership of the means of production, and we will discuss the merits of both.

musicblind

(4,484 posts)
52. I'm a Hillary supporter and this is pure flame bait.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:44 PM
Jan 2016

Of course Bernie Sanders believes in private property. I'm sure he, like most Americans, owns private property.

Stuff like this is showcasing our worst sides. We are all members of the Democratic party and implying that one of our own does not support owning personal property is tempestuous at best.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
148. Well then, it certainly served its purpose!
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 08:45 AM
Jan 2016

Talking about flames...

You know what I liked about sitting around a campfire when I was a kid? Toasting marshmallows. Getting them to that point right before they catch on fire, then eating them.

A thing we did a few times was gather all the families together for a campfire at the lake, then we'd get out the wax milk cartons we'd saved and go down to the shore and light the spouts on fire and set them down in the water, and they'd all float out to the center of the lake.

Sanders just wants all people to have medical care as a right. As would be guaranteed with a universal single payer plan.
He wants all children to have higher education as a right.
This doesn't mean that the rich won't be allowed to employ private doctors, above and beyond universal coverage. But it does mean that a very high bar can be set with respect to expected coverage. It also means that expected coverage can be expanded via community clinics, when given a strong nucleus of care-givers working to a common purpose. It takes the matter of life and death out of the hands of a private insurance industry and puts it in the hands of the people, right down to community level outreach.
Likewise for education. There always has been and there always will be very elite private tutors for those who can pay.

I don't think Sanders wants to take anything away from anybody, except from those who want to pay absolutely no taxes for the betterment of the people. Just taxes for war, then? For corruption? Maybe taxation has to be modified only a very little, if taxes were better distributed. Maybe taxes should be purposed LESS toward the military and continued war, which only provides ground for war profiteering?

Ah, I still remember the olden days, setting those lit milk cartons down to float away.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
55. May I reframe your question? Thank you, I will.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jan 2016

Senator Sanders, are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?

That is what you actually wanted to say, is it not?

Bernin4U

(812 posts)
57. Wait, are youa repub troll
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:51 PM
Jan 2016

Trying to get Bernie elected by making Hillary supporters look like complete jerks?

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
65. The USA is older than Socialism
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:02 PM
Jan 2016

The early advocates of Socialism (Fourier, Owen, Blanc, and Tristan) had only two democratic societies to compare their models on, The United States and the Republic of France. The rest of the world was Monarchies and Theocracies.
Socialism was drempt up to counter the excesses of Victorian England and other Monarchies during the early industrial revolution.

We are the base model proving socialism works.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
68. How on earth can you not know the answer to that? Either you're a poorly
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:18 PM
Jan 2016

Informed voter who hasn't bothered to learn about all the candidates, or you're just red/flame baiting.

I totally doubt the former but just in case, here is the answer:

Yes, Bernie believes in private property every bit as much as FDR, for example.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
69. There were two Alerts sent on this OP
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:19 PM
Jan 2016

And there's no response yet? Are DU Adminstrstirs are going to allow this to stand?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
70. I think so.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:21 PM
Jan 2016

Like most American liberals, he is for capitalism with a safety net. Though right wingers will call that "Marxism" or "Communism," it is not really even "Socialism." The government would not own the means of production, so it's not socialism. Which is odd as many of his supporters here might not like the concept that Bernie is OK with "capitalism."

sinkingfeeling

(51,474 posts)
74. If you really wanted to know the answer, you could do an
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:17 PM
Jan 2016

Internet search and read what democratic socialism means. Here's the answer to your rather ignorant question: http://www.dsausa.org/what_is_democratic_socialism

QC

(26,371 posts)
75. I don't know what worries me more--
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:18 PM
Jan 2016

the thought that a regular participant here might honestly not know the difference between a social democrat and a communist, or the possibility that someone here might knowingly and deliberately engage in McCarthyism for the sake of trying to make some kind of point.

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
76. So tired of your ugly antics ...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:23 PM
Jan 2016

Somewhere in the past, I used to like you ...

That was before I saw your penchant for cynical and fallacious pleadings ...

Now I see who you really are ... Shocking ...

Gone

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
77. Didn't I just say y'all Clintonites had the Red Scare blinders up just last night?
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:25 PM
Jan 2016

Democratic Socialism. For the people, by the people. Wikipedia is your friend; why don't you bloody educate yourself?

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
78. Does Hillary believe people should not lose
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:32 PM
Jan 2016

their 401(k) savings when the banks, investment companies and insurance companies lose those funds due to their own criminal negligence? Is this really the game you want to play?

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
84. Do you even know the difference between what Marxists call "private property" and
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:40 PM
Jan 2016

what they call "personal property"?

In other words, just how deep does your ignorance really go?

 

hoosierlib

(710 posts)
85. uh Yes...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:41 PM
Jan 2016

He's not an effing communist...

Pretty simple breakdown of economic models:

Laissez-faire Capitalism is one extreme (private ownership of all property with no government regulation) and Authoritarian Communism on the other (public ownership of all property with government regulation all commerce and industries). Socialism is somewhere in the middle...

Bernie wants to slides us towards to a more regulated model, in line with what we had before the 1970's. Pretty simple to understand.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
90. Wow, the phony questions get more brainless by the day.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 03:19 PM
Jan 2016

You are either being deliberately obtuse, or you have been paying zero attention for the past 6 months.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
113. Ha!
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:04 PM
Jan 2016

Colonel Flagg: This won't look good on your record.
Frank Burns: But Colonel, it's just Reader's Digest.
Colonel Flagg: Not if you eliminate the third, fifth, and sixth letters, then it's Red's Digest, comrade.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
124. This is more trash from you.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:26 PM
Jan 2016

You should feel ashamed. But then you are an H supporter so that explains that.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
125. Of course he does - he owns a house in Burlington VT
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:35 PM
Jan 2016

and - as seen - he does have assets.

PS All the Scandinavian countries he has mentioned have private property -- and I suspect you know this.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
127. I dont know, but anyone who thinks it thru and believes there should be, isnt
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:38 PM
Jan 2016

thinking it thru, if talking about real property (land)

What happens when teaparty takes over everthing and sells Yellowstone, Yosemite and Waikiki Beach to the Koch bros?

Still like private land ownership?

Private property doesnt mean only real property.

Maybe you should ask about REAL property, which is land, which is what I am talking about.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
142. He's going to line you up at gunpoint, confiscate all your stuff,
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:06 AM
Jan 2016

then pack you off to internment camps for "re-education".

He's also going to confiscate your dog Muffy, and barbecue Muffy to feed the insatiable appetite of the freeloading hordes!

Thank the lord that Hillary Rodham Clinton hasn't a progressive bone in her body, because the commies are coming and she's the last hope to stand against them!

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
139. If you consider Gulags to be private property
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:49 AM
Jan 2016

then yes , he does . FFS I better check under my bed . Op is about 60 years late to the party .

delrem

(9,688 posts)
140. Bernie Sanders wants the state to confiscate your dog!
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:01 AM
Jan 2016

And barbecue it with all the other dogs it confiscates, to feed the rabid freeloading hordes!

Yes he does! He wants to barbecue your dog Muffy!
And he's going to send in the gendarmes to confiscate your barbecue sauce! Give it to the same rabid swarming hordes! Be afraid, arely, be very very afraid!

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
141. Come on
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:06 AM
Jan 2016

Just because he calls himself a socialist doesn't make it true.

He isn't even critical of all corporations or of capital generally. His critiques are directed against Wall Street, while he has showed himself willing to grant immunity to gun corporations, supported paying $800 billion to Lockheed Martin for the disastrous f-35, and voted for subsidies to sugar corporations. For some reason, his concerns are limited to financial institutions on a single street in Manhattan. In fact, he seems to have a particular problem with Goldman Sachs, yet never mentions other investment banks. His outrage is highly selective.

Though your post does reflect the sort of thing we are likely to see from the GOP should he become the nominee.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
158. Does Hillary believe in killing Iraqi babies? she must, since she voted for a war that
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:21 PM
Jan 2016

Killed a shit- ton of Iraqi babies.

Would that make Hillary a baby killer?????

Posting, BC the admins are still allowing this shit free play here

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
160. Naive right wing garbage
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:27 PM
Jan 2016

Seeing a lot of it the last couple days. Her supporters are on a desperate rampage.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
164. He is a pragmatic Socialist now?
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jan 2016

Maybe that is why he does not have the support of some hard core leftists, it does not appear that he will not work to destroy the capitalist system in favour of a social ownership model.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Does Sen. Sanders believe...