Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MSNBC - Will Hillary supporters support MOM just enough to give him 15% (Original Post) SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 OP
So much for democracy! This berns my butt. jillan Jan 2016 #1
+100000 moondust Jan 2016 #20
Let's just hope it backfires! jillan Jan 2016 #22
Caucuses are NOT democratic. Agschmid Jan 2016 #23
Candidates have done this for years... brooklynite Feb 2016 #31
That's great info. Thank you! n/t Lucinda Feb 2016 #33
I don't see how they can give away votes. Punkingal Jan 2016 #2
that is what I hope - but... SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #4
LOL Correct - WIll they Triangulate? Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #5
Because of rounding. Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #9
If they don't reach 15% they can go home or switch to SBS or HRC. JudyM Jan 2016 #10
In some caucus locations, apparently that's the plan. TDale313 Jan 2016 #3
Well if they do I hope it backfires on her sorry butt. Punkingal Jan 2016 #7
"if it dosen't hurt her" Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #8
The way it works is all so weird... TDale313 Jan 2016 #17
yes, some weird shit. Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #19
Any MoM supporter who witnessed this and had a shred of self respect would KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #30
Silly alcibiades_mystery Jan 2016 #6
??? SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #12
Hillary does not think so - just talked to RM about it SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #16
Since he appears to be down below 5% it would make a significant dent in her support. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2016 #11
Defiant Martin O'Malley insists he won't play Iowa kingmaker. elleng Jan 2016 #13
He doesn't really have a choice in the matter. Agschmid Jan 2016 #24
Clinton won't even clear the 15% threshold in SOME caucuses.. Flying Phoenix Jan 2016 #14
I'm not sure Bjornsdotter Jan 2016 #15
this went on, without 'apps' 30+ years ago mattvermont Jan 2016 #18
I did not realize that... Bjornsdotter Jan 2016 #28
only if they can win without the votes they give M'OM. Otherwise, they may throw ALL of their votes Kip Humphrey Jan 2016 #21
As if she'll have supporters to spare - lol! Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #25
sounds like a way to discount an O'Malley surge bigtree Jan 2016 #26
And that too. It stinks. jillan Jan 2016 #29
Obama championed this in 2008. BigGLiberal Jan 2016 #27
Perhaps you want to talk to Sanders' Iowa Director who advocated this strategy in 2008... brooklynite Feb 2016 #32

moondust

(19,993 posts)
20. +100000
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:41 PM
Jan 2016

Stop the dishonest gaming the system! That also goes for the dirty McCaskill ad strategy that Republicans may now be using; it's not clever, it's crooked.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
23. Caucuses are NOT democratic.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:51 PM
Jan 2016

They often disenfranchise many voters.

The entire process is flawed.

brooklynite

(94,594 posts)
31. Candidates have done this for years...
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 12:37 AM
Feb 2016
This kind of tactical maneuvering is an old Iowa pattern, part of what a former Iowa aide to John Kerry in 2004, Addisu Demissie, described as being part of the state’s “brilliantly, gloriously, esoterically small-d democratic” tradition. (Demissie describes the caucus math in excruciating detail in his piece.) The Clinton and Obama campaigns played similar tactical games in 2008, and a deal between Obama’s and Bill Richardson’s campaigns was controversial enough to be kept top secret at the time. At the time, outraged Clinton aides called reporters to denounce the deal.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/hillary-bernie-math#.hu8zErb9N7


Bill Richardson's Iowa Campaign Director was....Robert Becker, who is....Bernie Sanders' Iowa Campaign Director.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
9. Because of rounding.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:31 PM
Jan 2016

Let's say at a precinct there is a little more than enough Hillary Clinton support for 3 delegates. They could send some of their supporters to O'Malley's group so that he gets a delegate and Sanders doesn't and still have those 3 delegates.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
10. If they don't reach 15% they can go home or switch to SBS or HRC.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:31 PM
Jan 2016

HRC leaders are armed with an app to figure out exactly how many supporters MOM needs to hit that 15% and they can, by switching, help that group reach that figure. That's the basic idea, though there's more involved.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
3. In some caucus locations, apparently that's the plan.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:27 PM
Jan 2016

If he's close in a location and it doesn't hurt her but might keep Sanders from picking up an extra delegate.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
17. The way it works is all so weird...
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:37 PM
Jan 2016

But reports were saying this was a tactical move the Obama campaign used in 08.

The theory seems to be keep O'Malley viable in some venues where he's on the bubble because those supporters would prob go to Sanders if he wasn't. If sending a few supporters to O'Malley's corner keeps Sanders from gaining an extra delegate they might think it worth it.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
30. Any MoM supporter who witnessed this and had a shred of self respect would
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:39 PM
Jan 2016

immediately abandon ship to join Bernie.

I hope O'Malley himself denounces the tactic.

 

Flying Phoenix

(114 posts)
14. Clinton won't even clear the 15% threshold in SOME caucuses..
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:33 PM
Jan 2016

Let's see: 1,300:450 as an sample size from Dubuque http://time.com/4201067/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-iowa-rallies/

74% Bernie, 26% Clinton...and didn't include that was just those that was turned away (500 were)... so let's look again - that number jumps to 90% Bernie, 10% Clinton.

Get it?


Bjornsdotter

(6,123 posts)
15. I'm not sure
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:34 PM
Jan 2016

...if it would let her win the battle but make her lose the war. I know the Obama campaign started it and I found it distasteful then and I suspect it may influence some voters who are on the fence in other states.

mattvermont

(646 posts)
18. this went on, without 'apps' 30+ years ago
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:38 PM
Jan 2016

I attended many caucus in Iowa. This was standard fare. I do not like it, and I think it looks bad, but 'all is fair' in the the mean political streets.

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
21. only if they can win without the votes they give M'OM. Otherwise, they may throw ALL of their votes
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 10:42 PM
Jan 2016

to M'OM if M'OM thereby beats Sanders. That way, they deny the win to Bernie.

brooklynite

(94,594 posts)
32. Perhaps you want to talk to Sanders' Iowa Director who advocated this strategy in 2008...
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 12:38 AM
Feb 2016

...for Bill Richardson.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»MSNBC - Will Hillary supp...