Good luck, Soros. 1% throwing money isn't the answer.

he is super money fighting the own members of his party, and a small donor financed candidate. Can you not see the difference or do you just not get it?

They think throwing money to PAC's solve everything. Right now Bernie's on a huge friggin roll. I think the caucus turnout will be more than they expected.

disliked this man for 40 years.

They couldn't jink, bob and weave the way they do if they didn't know exactly what the hell is going on.

#notmeus

Won't throw under the bus if they think it will help Bernie.

No one (liberal hero or otherwise) should be able to donate that much money to a candidate. That's why Citizens United must be overturned.

Some are only complaining now because he supports Hillary Clinton. In 2004, the only people complaining about George Soros was the Republicans.

People are only complaining because Hillary Clinton is getting the majority of the contributions.

Bottom line - I want to do away with all PACs. Do you think Citizens United should be overturned?

Does this mean I believe that Democrats should stop accepting big money? Nope. Until it gets overturned, I don;t care where the money comes from. My first priority is to defeat the Republicans at ALL COST. The supreme court is too important.

So, our end goal is the same. I guess what we differ on is how we get there. I am willing to accept and use big money to defeat Republicans. You want to do it in a more pure way, right?

I am taking you at your word you mean what you say but you have to understand feel the system can't be fixed by doing the same thing you say you shouldn't be doing.

It's like being an alcoholic and saying you will stop drinking when they bring back prohibition.

elections. The money in politics is the first thing that has to go. If we get the influence out of our political system, it gives regular people a chance to serve the people.

Health care, climate change, our crumbling infrastructure, Wall Street reform, etc. Nothing changes until we cut the cancer out of our political system.

Thank you for kind words. Respect!

actually believes in campaign reform, and he banked his campaign on it/us.

light and beacon. Back then a lot of oil executive and CEOS were spending a lot of money to get Bush re-elected. We didn't have any counters until George Soros came along. A lot of us are still grateful for what he did.

You are only showing "concern" because Sanders isn't getting his money.

If this means accepting big money then so be it.

A republican president will appoint a Conservative justice. nt

I don't blame him for giving it or her for taking it. That being said, I'd rather support a candidate that didn't need it and didn't want it.

Like you said, we need the money to defeat the billionaire republicans. I heard they are planning to spend over 1 billion in this election cycle. We need the George Soros of the world to help balance the threat and contribute to Democrats.

especially just after Bernie announcing 20 million in small donations.

be based on foreign cash flowing into our elections so this is the sort of event that may push us all closre to overruling Citizens United; 2nd - I'm so proud that Sanders has taken a stance against this sort of billionaire-honeypot fundraising model; 3rd - I want Sanders to win, but if a corporate cash funded candidate wins, I hope its Hillary and not Cruz or Rubio or one of the other clown car riders.

They are hating on him because he is contributing to Hillary. When he donated over 20 million to defeat Bush in 2004, we accepted his money gladly. He was celebrated as a liberal hero and savior on DU. It's only when he donates money to Hillary that he starts to get trashed.

We are gonna lose this election if we don't accept any donations from big money Democrats. We need Geroge Soros.

pay-for-play funding.

We agree that -- if we can't stop this corrupt campaign financing model -- I'd rather see Clinton getting that money from Soros who has acceptable values rather than seeing the Koch monsters or Israel-interests-over-US-interests Adelson funding Cruz or Rubio based on twisted values.

This is 2016.

The whole milieu of this election thus far is anger and disgust towards super rich elites taking our country from us.

The Sanders phenomenon is a reaction to the bankers, money manipulators, corporatists, et al.

With all of the Goldman Sachs money and the other special interests, Wall Street, and corporate dollars Clinton has taken the last thing she needs is $8 million given by Soros to the Hillary super PAC.

But, I'm glad the Clinton super PAC has felt desperate enough to take this money -- it just makes it that much easier to make the case for the reality that Hillary Clinton is the one percent and is beholden to the one percent.

You can keep repeating 2004 until you're blue in the face. This isn't 2004.

a common tactic it seems, for you.

Make it personal when someone confronts you with an uncomfortable truth.

Collect all you can convince people to part with.

with SCOTUS appointees.

at the Dem nominee. Hillary is not about to go into battle with one hand tied behind her back.j

Clinton this election.

Check out this post from the Sane Progressive. It seems Clinton is planning to get up to some shenanigans in Iowa tomorrow night but the news has leaked...

Soros or no Soros, WE WILL ALL BE WATCHING HOW THE CAUCUS GOES TOMORROW NIGHT and there had better NOT be any funny business.

https://youtube/PUZ34OZ-cHk

Yayyyyyyy

Under the bus with him!

the guy running against the billionaires