2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIn light of a post declaring Governor O'Malley's campaign financial meltdown
which, at this hour, has received 64 responses, I cross-post this, Reasons to Fight for Martin O'Malley (thanks to bigtree
'AS a lifelong Democrat from a Democratic family, Martin O'Malley has repeatedly stepped up to challenging elections and has consistently won the support of Democrats through progressive stances and progressive policy achievements. His efforts in office have resulted in significant and concrete progressive changes and improvements in the lives of millions of citizens of my state. My pleasure and pride in seeing him step up to the challenge of running against a Democrat with not only national name recognition, but a built-in support base from a previous run for the presidency, is compounded by the decidedly progressive positions his campaign has put in front of his candidacy.
Matching an impressive record of progressive achievement and actions throughout his years of public office in Maryland, Martin O'Malley's campaign is determined to steer our party's presidential politics in an aggressively progressive direction - that effort matched, of course, by Bernie Sander's own progressive campaign - both of which have resulted in a national discussion of progressive ideals and initiatives which have already influenced the debate in our national legislature, as well as positively influenced the worthwhile campaign of our party's current front-runner, Hillary Clinton, in the polls.
I think O'Malley's bid is a heroic effort, given the political odds he's facing - typical of his political career in which he's repeatedly run against adversity and other daunting challenges to advance the causes he believes in.
O'Malley has succeeded in almost every political contest he's participated in; beginning with his service as an assistant State's Attorney for the City of Baltimore in 1988 to 1990; serving on the a Baltimore City Councilor from 1991 to 1999 with the responsibility as Chairman of the Legislative Investigations Committee and Chairman of the Taxation and Finance Committee.
O'Malley was elected to two terms as Mayor of Baltimore, and subsequently elected to two terms as Governor of his state of Maryland. O'Malley was elected as the Vice Chairman of the Democratic Governors Association for 20092010, and on December 1, 2010, he was elected Chairman for 20102011.
As we observe the presidential race today, we're led by press reports of polls, crowds, and money which has served to elevate two of our candidates over the rest of our Democratic field; placing Martin O'Malley well behind in the speculation race. We're no more served by a 'coronation' of the two front runners right now than our political debate was served by the 'inevitability' label applied earlier to the leader of our Democratic pack.
Take the opportunity in these months and months before the first vote to get to know this candidate and measure his record of actual accomplishment in office - advancing progressive initiatives through divided legislatures, and enacting them by executive order where he saw fit - weighing all of those actions against the rhetoric from the others in this race.
As for Martin O'Malley's progressive efforts in office, I offer a litany here which only touches the surface of his advocacy and action:' >>>
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511102525
I/we appreciate those of you who support and appreciate him, his experience, his plans, and his efforts. No thanks to those of you who ignore him.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Completely uncalled for, imo, and there isn't very much I'm above. That thread was just scummy.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)Public financing of campaigns is a need for a democratic process.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)in question to GTFO.
I am sorry Gov. O'Malley's supporters here had to witness that tasteless display of grave dancing.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)People thinking it was are pretty delusional. We come here to actually discuss news, numbers, policies, personalities and more. What the majority of the responses in that thread were about was saying it was ugly to provide actual information.
so, only happy news shall be posted from now, right? No facts, figures, actual information, etc.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)my Ignore list.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)To think saying such a simple thing earns such a lofty position. Enjoy your continued bubble.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)ellen, that is a sad state of affairs of our politics. but MOM I think has matching funds now.. I do not know if he has that 500,000 debt.. but trust me.. it is nothing compared to other candidates.. I have no idea what the point of that op was.... politics is just awful in what it does to our candidates in trying to raise funds to run..
elleng
(130,974 posts)but of course the op that started this all was in a tenor, as you know I'm sure.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)about the other persons op .. not this one.. I meant I went and read that and did not understand the point of their op..
elleng
(130,974 posts)And if I'd had your numbers, I might have posted them in direct reply. Would have been interesting to come up with such a response.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Sanders is more all over the place and I have a less favorable opinion of him since learning more.
O'Malley I have liked more and more as the process has gone along. I really wish the media would have determined O'Malley was the one to take on Clinton, not Sanders. The media has done a great disservice to this primary. They screwed O'Malley and the rest of us in order to increase their bottom line.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)Nice try but a huge fail.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It would have been a much better race had they chosen O'Malley.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)You might have missed it but O'Malley has been in the race all along. Why do you suppose he can't seem to get past 7%?
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)But O'Malley was in before Bernie.
So it would appear the people chose him.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)At this point, with evidence in hand, it doesn't look to be that close. I think this would be much closer had they picked O'Malley.
When you say the people chose him, we simply don't know that yet.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)The most telling part of that thread is that the OP writer has never come back in to defend it.
He has revealed himself before but now there is no going back.
elleng, you have been the exact opposite end of the spectrum in behavior and have posted in a way that has moved this entire site. I think all the good will and thoughts for O'Malley here is a direct result of you and the other O'Malley supporters. I went from dismissing him because of Baltimore to reading his platform because of you.
I have written in the past that he is a man of honor, I have been incredibly moved by his stand with Muslims in this country and especially after San Bernardino. The dismissive actions of the debate monitors in all the debates has been appalling, his party hasn't treated him any better.
Talk about a fighter, we see it in action up to this very minute.
It is nice to know that are two candidates who actually seem to care about all people, listen to all people and are willing to fight a great battle to do so.
elleng
(130,974 posts)(One of my favorites!)
Thanks for your kind words.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)And regardless of the outcome, the O'Malley supporters here have been unfailingly thoughtful, courteous, and classy.