Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 11:29 AM Feb 2016

Iowa Democratic Party - How Delegates are Awarded on Caucus Night

On the night of the Iowa Caucuses, Iowa Democrats will gather at nearly 1,700 precincts to make their preferences for the Democratic nomination for President. These preferences are represented by the awarding of delegates to the county convention to the Presidential candidates at each of the precinct locations. Below is a brief description of how delegates are awarded on caucus night:

Step 1: Precinct chairs count the number of eligible caucus goers.

Step 2: Determine viability. In order to be eligible to elect delegates, candidates must have a minimum number of caucus attendees in his or her group. Precinct chairs will determine the viability threshold using the following formulas:
• If the caucus elects ONE delegate: The caucus shall not divide into preference groups. The delegate is elected by a simple majority.
• If the caucus elects TWO delegates: Total eligible caucus attendees x 0.25 = viability
• If the caucus elects THREE delegates: Total eligible caucus attendees ÷ 6 = viability
• If the caucus elects FOUR or more delegates: Total eligible caucus attendees x 0.15 = viability
*Note: For viability, always round up to the nearest whole number.

Step 3: Caucus goers will form preference groups. Precinct chairs ensure all preference groups are viable, and there are not more preference groups than delegates to elect.
*Note: If preference group(s) are not viable, realignment occurs. If more viable preference group(s) are formed than delegates to elect, the smallest preference group(s) must realign.

Step 4: Realignment process occurs. Caucus goers in groups deemed non-viable can join with a viable group, join together, or pull people from other groups to become viable themselves.

Step 5: Award Delegates. After realignment occurs, precinct chairs award each viable preference group with the appropriate number of delegates using the following formula (round up at 0.5, round down below 0.5):
(Attendees in preference group × Total delegates the caucus elects) ÷ Total number of eligible attendees = Delegates for group to elect

Step 6: After rounding, total up the delegates awarded to each preference group and compare that number to the total number of delegates assigned to be elected at the precinct.
• If the numbers match, move on to election of delegates.
• If the total number of delegates is FEWER than the number to be elected, an additional delegate will be awarded to the group(s) with the highest decimal below 0.5.
• If the total number of delegates is GREATER than the number to be elected, a delegate will be subtracted from the preference group(s) with the lowest decimal above 0.5. Note: a group cannot lose its only delegate.

Example: Precinct Alpha is to elect a total of 7 delegates. There are 100 eligible caucus attendees at the precinct. Five viable preference groups form. Group A has 20 members; group B has 18 members; group C has 27 members; group D has 19 members and Group E has 16 members. Here is how the delegates would be awarded:
Original Adjusted
• Group A: (20 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.40 round to 1
• Group B: (18 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.26 round to 1
• Group C: (27 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.89 round to 2
• Group D: (19 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.33 round to 1
• Group E: (16 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.12 round to 1
• TOTAL = 6*
• Group A: (20 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.40 round to 2*
• Group B: (18 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.26 round to 1
• Group C: (27 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.89 round to 2
• Group D: (19 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.33 round to 1
• Group E: (16 x 7) ÷ 100 = 1.12 round to 1
• TOTAL = 7
*Since there are 7 delegates to award in Precinct Alpha, the group that rounded down with the decimal closest to 0.5 gets to round UP instead. Therefore, Group A, at 1.40, gets the extra delegate.

Paid for and produced in-house by the Iowa Democratic Party

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
1. Wow! Very confusing! All that, PLUS the fact that it happens ONLY at 7PM ...
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 11:48 AM
Feb 2016

... it seems to be a process that discourages participation and one that literally prevents participation if someone must work during the appointed hour (or must be elsewhere as a caregiver, or who must rely on others for transportation).

If you have transportation, and are fortunate enough to be able to not have to work, and don't have others relying on you, and are mobile enough to meander between groups/rooms and don't need assistance ... then perhaps the caucus process works.

I suppose it's better than the old "smoke-filled-room" process of choosing a candidate ... but in my mind, the caucus process is one that by its very nature, ends up excluding many individuals who could otherwise participate if it were a state that had all-day voting (or absentee voting).

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
2. My exact thoughts.
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 11:53 AM
Feb 2016

After tonight, I believe you and I will have many people voicing these same concerns. Seems all Clinton supporters I speak to are very well aware of the oppressive nature of the Iowa Caucus. I believe many outside of the Clinton camp are going to be joining us in this basic understanding tonight. Really stinks that is what has to happen in order for some to recognize blatant voter disenfranchisement.

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
3. Don't this of this as less representative than a Primary (even though it is...)
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 12:00 PM
Feb 2016

Think of it as MORE representative than the old smoke-filled room model. Historically, Parties did NOT hold Primary elections for Presidential candidates (in 1968 there were only 12 States that gave voters a choice):



In most States, the Party leadership made the decision on how to allocate delegates. The caucus process kept control within the Party, but expanded participation to Party activists who were motivated enough to to come to the Party nomination meetings.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
4. It's important to note that the delegates selected at caucuses
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 12:07 PM
Feb 2016

are delegates to the next level, which is the county convention. At that convention, delegates will be selected to go to the congressional district convention. At that convention, delegates are selected to go to the state convention.

Only at the state convention, are delegates elected for the national convention.

What that means is that we will not know exactly how many pledged delegates for each candidate there are until after the state convention in Iowa. Fairly accurate estimates, however can be made following each step, but they will change after each stage.

Only people very familiar with the Iowa caucus system can accurately predict the final delegate count. Pay no attention to anyone else. The system is fairly complex and people not extremely familiar with the system will almost certainly make mistakes.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
5. So it is not winner take all and they will both get some delegates
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 06:16 PM
Feb 2016

so all the crowing about "winning" won't mean much long term.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
6. Do my eyes deceive me? You actually posted some useful information. K&R
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 06:36 PM
Feb 2016

Never thought I would see the day that I gave one of your posts a rec but here it is.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Iowa Democratic Party - H...