2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGod, this "Head (Clinton) vs. "Heart" (Bernie) reveals how screwed up we are
How many times have I been hearing this meme "I love Bernie and agree with everything he says, but I've got to go with my head instead of my heart because I don't think someone like Bernie can win. The country isn't ready for it."
Some kid on MSNBC was struggling with the election decision , and chose C,inton and stated that idiotic reason.
For crying out loud. Don't you people have the self confidence to believe that maybe, just maybe your own views and values might be shared by a majority of Americans? Maybe, just maybe, many other people have the same values and aspirations.
Maybe your "heart" is smarter than your damn head.
THIS kind of reasoning is why we allow our country to sink deeper and deeper into the pit. Because our "hearts" realize we're sinking into the pit -- but our "heads" don't believe we can ever stop sinking.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)I vote my conscience -- which allows for input from both the head and heart.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Hillary is the better candidate by far and will almost certainly make a better President.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It baffles me, but it's okay.
It's the "I won't support the person I'd really prefer" mentality that I am referring to.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Bernie is the better candidate by far and will certainly make a better President.
.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)That's just his crowing tonight at his win. It's hardly the first, or tenth, time he's made that vow.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)HRC - supporting her Wall Street corporate buddies since God was a boy.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)How anyone can think Hillary would be better for us than him is beyond me. I can understand people who back her because they believe she has a better chance of winning, but to say she's a better candidate - that's absurd, imo.
She already admitted she won't fight for $15/hour, single payer healthcare and tuition free college.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)in 1981. His values were outstanding then, and have remained so consistently.
(I appreciate your posts on DU:GDP!)
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I was still in school but what a small world!
I appreciate your posts too, in fact I just kicked and rec'd one of your outstanding ops.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)He was speaking at a small college in upstate NY that I had previously attended. When I read that he was speaking there, I called my brother and said to get ready -- we were going to meet an important person. Because I was friends with the "activists" on campus, we were able to meet with Sanders, both before and after his presentation.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Years and years of town hall meetings and Brunch with Bernie prove he never lost touch with people and just because he's reached rock star status now doesn't mean he'll let it go to his head.
I'm still stunned by his popularity, never in a million years did I dream he would set the country on fire like he has.
He's a mensch!
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)considering entering the presidential primary, my oldest son asked me if I thought he was looking to make a statement? I said that I believed he was serious about finding a way to win the nomination and presidency. My first impression of Bernie was that he was a serious man. And everything I've learned about (and from) him since then has re-enforced that.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)creatives4innovation
(98 posts)Then tell me if you still feel that way. Flight Logs Put Clinton, Dershowitz on Pedophile Billionaires Sex Jet
Festivito
(13,452 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)otherwise they'd get together and choose someone who'd be good for them
dana_b
(11,546 posts)if we actually believed that we COULD change things, we would be an actual threat. As it is, things may well stay business as usual and everything will go smoothly for them.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's not an either or for us, Bernie has better policies, no baggage and has consistently remained true to liberal values.
Hillary is a hawk who will follow neo-con foreign policies, is bought and paid for by Wall Street and can't be trusted to fight for us.
How "smart" is that?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)So does my heart.
randome
(34,845 posts)If someone truly doesn't think Sanders can win, why would they spend that time and resources supporting him? Especially when, as I believe, that any of our three candidates would make a great President?
There is such a thing as dreaming but most people don't dream about what they consider to be impossible.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]
Armstead
(47,803 posts)IMO your dreams are your common sense. They may not all come true, but you follow those and you're moving in the direction you want to be going. Multiply that by millions and you have a country moving in the right direction.
(I like that. It's kind of poetic. )
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)I do idiotic things sometimes but I'm not an idiot.
And I'm not trying to win anyone over with this post. I am venting.
Duval
(4,280 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
daleanime
(17,796 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)I don't think that's a useful meme either, but knock yourself out.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Never Ever.
Duval
(4,280 posts)In fact, we're full of hope!
immoderate
(20,885 posts)Emotion makes people cling to the candidate who would surrender their best interests. Perhaps it's nostalgia. Maybe it's awarding points for effort.
--imm
Armstead
(47,803 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)If it's rewarding it's gonna be bad for common folks.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I read somethings about puritan medical practice once, but I don't remember if castor oil was in their pharmacopoeia.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)The only reasons one would vote for Clinton are extremely fantasy-based. Every single issue goes to Sanders.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 1, 2016, 06:16 PM - Edit history (1)
It's about Corporatist Oligarchs vs The Middle-Class
One of the Candidates represents the Oligarch 1% and One Represents Us the 99%.
That, is the choice.
Jackilope
(819 posts)Meanwhile, slowly and surely people need to be educated and wake up to reality that for too long people have been settling and voting against their best interests.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)thinkers. They think like a spreadsheet. My daughter is like that. If you posed this question to her, she'd tell you every time she went with her heart she ended getting screwed.
That quote from Susan Sarandon, the 'fuck them' one.
Some of those people that are saying that Bernie can't get elected are scared. They don't see how he can get it done. They're broke, underemployed, underinsured, etc. And they're faith is all used up. They're teetering. Maybe Hillary looks safe to them. Just because you don't understand doesn't mean their fears aren't legitimate or they should be criticized and humiliated. And maybe her comment wasn't meant for them, but guess what, they heard it.
Head/heart means different things to different people.
I vote a combination of head/heart. I mean let's face it, if I voted with my heart I'd write in George Clooney.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I do agree with you that ideally one should vote with both head and heart.
But my argument is not based on how desperate or difficult one's situation. Personally, I have been well acquainted with hardship at various times and my own political beliefs were not affected one way or the other (except to hopefully be more empathetic).
I would say that voting for a person who represents your actual values and beliefs and goals for society is also in one's own self-interest. For example, having college way back in the rear view mirror, Bernie's proposals for college tuition doesn't affect me in the least. But I believe in it both for the sake of the kids of that age, and because it's better for society to have a well educated population..On the other hand, with Social Security approaching, his goal of making that a more livable level also appeals to my self interest.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)thinks it's going to be Sanders v Trump in the GE.
I ASSumed they'd vote for Sanders, they're Liberals. They said I'm thinking Trump might not be a bad idea. I said WHAT?!? (scooby doo voice)
Here's how he broke it down--goes to your head/heart thing.
He thinks Trump is pandering and bullshitting with a lot of his rhetoric.
He said he's a business man so he's always going to do what's best for the business; the country in this case.
He will listen to all sides, look at all proposals and go with the best. So if the Democrats go with a single payer and have economist to back up why it's better economically for the country he'll go for it.
Same with other things like Colleges and such.
My friend doesn't believe Trump is really this ideologue he's playing to be. He's posed with Bibles, he's never talked about religion in the past. He's not a war hawk; he's just talking a good game.
He put a lot of thought into it. I was kinda stunned. As crazy as it sounds it's almost made sense.
Analytical thinker.
This was from someone who was heartbroken when Elizabeth Warren didn't run. Go figure.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Trump is a manipulated mean-spirited narcissist. I would trust him as far as I could pull his jet.
But I do think he a pragmatist and would jump on any idea he thought would achieve a desired result, without regard to ideology. He might be effective in that sense and actually do some good, in spite of himself.
Someone with those traits and a better character might be worthy of consideration.
But both my head and heart think that he's a loose cannon, and his willingness to adapt to the worst kind of bigotry is kind of scary.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Nice conversation! Thanks!
Btw...I didn't just pick Clooney cuz he's easy on the eyes. I agree with his politics. He's a good person.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Upon doing so the only conclusion is that Clinton is a corrupt pathological liar who is bought and paid for by corporations.
Many of us are analytical thinkers (nobody knows each others day jobs on DU). Many choose Bernie.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)... uh ... nevermind ...
one_voice
(20,043 posts)yes....
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)WIN, Bernie, WIN!
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Fuck this shit, Democrats need to be stronger and braver than this.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)"It sounded better in the original German" Molly Ivins re: Pat Buchanan
Saviolo
(3,282 posts)The story boils down to the idea that if enough people (or cats) believe in a dream strong enough, it becomes true.
Full of Neil Gaiman's stunning magical realism, but also a lovely little story.
From the description on Wikipedia:
If enough people dream and believe enough in Bernie, he will be the change people have been waiting for.
PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)It's frustrating, but I'm pretty sure that Hillary's campaign has tried to co-opt the "Vote your head" strategy because they know that's the only way they'll win, by sewing seeds of doubt.
Frankly, I've kept an eye to the Clinton boards out of curiosity and it blows my mind how far they go to defend her and slam her competition even when it's not rational. You can't post non-conforming thoughts in an echo chamber without getting the boot, so that's frustrating. This whole damn election has been frustrating.
Anyway, I'm crossing my fingers for the better candidate (Sanders).
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Period.
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)My head and heart are with Bernie. I think higher of the American people than the DNC and their favored candidate.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Mine too!
From the OP
I think we don't follow our natural instincts often enough...and they are there for a reason. To warn us of danger, help us make better choices, and weave a safer path through life.
My instincts tell me that following my belief in what Bernie is fighting for, is more important that letting my head tell me it might be a little scary to change course. Change is scary, but it often turns out to be very good for us.
I am not afraid of democratic socialism at all. What I am afraid of is the resistance that we will meet and have to fight. But I'm up for it...for now and forever!
Those women who are voting for Hillary primarily because she's a woman and they want to see her break the glass ceiling...I think that is more heart than head. But that's just me, as a woman, who also wants to see a woman break that glass ceiling, but my head tells me she is not the right one to do it without leaving some sad marks on our history.
MatthewStLouis
(904 posts)I have to talked to several women, and while they like Bernie, they find the prospect of getting to vote for a woman in the general election very enticing. I think alot of the older caucus voters will be siding with Hillary just for that reason. Can Bernie count on a high enough turnout of new caucus voters? Hmmm.
That said: Go Bernie!
Armstead
(47,803 posts)If they honestly think she's the best candidate, okay. But its a quandary for some I guess.
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)Republican nominee. The Republicans will spend the year saying nothing other than, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, emails, emails, emails, impeachment, impeachment, etc.
The republican candidate will says this so often that people will believe it & not vote for her and many democrats will not come out & vote..
On the other hand, Senator Sanders will hands down beat any republican candidate because there is nothing they can say that will harm him.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)My kids will have a better life growing up in a world where they don't have to go deeply into debt to receive a higher education, where healthcare is affordable and a right, where our country takes climate change seriously and works to protect the environment. So Bernie. Confused why he'd be thought of as "heart."
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Like so much of drivel like "he doesn't have the support of group ABC", "he won't be able to raise enough money", "nobody will vote for a socialist".
It's all campaign rhetoric bullshit. Vote for who you like and let the mindf*&@ers go sit on their triangles.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)But I choose Hillary... I guess thats my head doing that.
KentuckyWoman
(6,687 posts)I understand being inspired or excited or energized sure. Love? That's a bit much.
R. P. McMurphy
(834 posts)The choice is obvious. GO BERNIE!
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,123 posts)I am terrified of what could happen if Bernie is nominated. Dems count on a "savior" rather than doing the hard work to create a movement. Cons do that very well. It took them 50 years to undo the New Deal. And they have fascist tendencies. Keep that in mind when going with your heart. Had the country not been mired in the Great Depression, we'd have had no new deal.
"The New Deal produced a political realignment, making the Democratic Party the majority (as well as the party that held the White House for seven out of nine Presidential terms from 1933 to 1969), with its base in liberal ideas."
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Sanders is not Reagan -- he is actually a qualified CEO, as he proved in Burlington. But there are parallels in terms of emotional resonance and effectiveness.
The GOP chose an inspiring leader over a qualified technocratic hack, and managed to push the pendulum to the right very quickly as a result.
Reagan inspired people but before the election he was treated by many as a laughingstock. Lo and behold, he was a good leader, and led to the undoing of the New Deal in much less that 50 years.
In order to push it in the opposite discretion, we ought to not repeat the "pragmatic" approach that ultimaty has also helped to advance the Reagan Revolution.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,123 posts)I just don't see a Capitalist system be overturned by Bernie Sanders or any other politician. And that is the goal. FDR saved it from itself. Also, Reagan laid way for all the moneyed interests and Citizens United which FDR didn't have to overcome.
But I still hope you're right and my night terrors are in vain.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)We are told we can't do something and believe it, thinking others know better, so we give up on our dreams and ideas and resign ourselves to obedience. It's really difficult to overcome this societal messaging and move forward with confidence into the unknown, believing that we will be ok no matter what they say.
I see all of this changing though; collectively, and for me personally. There are so many people now who are ignoring the limitation messages and choosing a different way. It's only when we do this, when we just don't care what they tell us anymore, when we thumb our noses in defiance, that we are free to make this country the way we want it to be.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Clinton will pick only corporate leaning people.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)We chatted a bit, and I told her why I was caucusing for Sanders, and I think I may have helped her make her decision to do so, as well.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,687 posts)I don't think it's quite what they mean but ........ Saying Hillary has no heart or saying Bernie hasn't thought things through is just pure silliness.
Even what I think they are trying to say is they LOVE a candidate they don't think can win. I don't know about "love" but we SHOULD be voting for candidates that speak to our higher nature. The entire job description, apart from making the tough calls when it comes to military actions, is to set the tone and direction for our country. It's his job to take credit when it works, and take the blame when it doesn't.
So when they say their's a disconnect between feelings and brains that baffles me. As soon as a candidate for POTUS makes your heart sing....... THAT'S YOUR VOTE. Common sense that.
7962
(11,841 posts)iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)To vote for your heart ? to vote your conscience ?
ive always thought so ...
you do what you HAVE to do in the general if your nominee doesn't get the bid .. that's a given. all democrats should vote for whomever we select come general election time. that's just common sense.
I'm a Bernie supporter, and I can promise you if Hillary does get the bid ill most certain vote for her in the general... hopefully Hillary supporters can say the same
Trajan
(19,089 posts)It's all head ...
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)can't imagine that changing.
mountain grammy
(26,624 posts)at his funeral:
Some men see things as they are and say why.
I dream things that never were and say why not.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)has shown consistently good judgement and has a
vision as well.
My heart votes for the individual, who truly cares
about the people.
Both taken together= Bernie.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Nothing Hillary says makes my head agree with her.
Nothing Hillary says makes my heart yearn for her.
My whole being wants Bernie Sanders to be the next President of the USA.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)They tell us 24/7 that what makes perfect sense to all of us is just too RADICAL for anyone else.