2016 Postmortem

Arazi

(6,829 posts) Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:28 AM Feb 2016

Seltzer, 538, and all the rest are proved to be WRONG

Bernie Sanders is a phenom that can't be quantified.

Deal with it Clintonistas and the rest of the Estsblishment.

(Wish there was a fuck you smilie to insert here for the smug DUers who scolded us that we were ignorant)

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Seltzer, 538, and all the rest are proved to be WRONG (Original Post) Arazi Feb 2016 OP

You seem nice. spyker29 Feb 2016 #1

Isn't this a little premature? jcgoldie Feb 2016 #2

They forecasted HRC with near air-tight margins we were assured Arazi Feb 2016 #4

I'm not sure how Sgent Feb 2016 #3

Do you know what a probability estimate is? brooklynite Feb 2016 #5

spyker29

(89 posts)

1. You seem nice.

Reply to Arazi (Original post)

Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:29 AM

Feb 2016

jcgoldie

(11,645 posts)

2. Isn't this a little premature?

Reply to Arazi (Original post)

Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:30 AM

Feb 2016

She still seems to be winning.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)

4. They forecasted HRC with near air-tight margins we were assured

Reply to jcgoldie (Reply #2)

Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:34 AM

Feb 2016

here on DU and elsewhere

I'll take my mad schadenfreude where I can get it which is that HRC is NOT gold.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)

3. I'm not sure how

Reply to Arazi (Original post)

Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:32 AM

Feb 2016

Nate gave Sanders a 33% chance of winning, and it looks like HRC is going to win by 1 or 2 votes.

brooklynite

(94,727 posts)

5. Do you know what a probability estimate is?

Reply to Arazi (Original post)

Tue Feb 2, 2016, 12:45 AM

Feb 2016

It's an estimate of what it LIKELY to happen, not what WILL happen.

Reply to this discussion