2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBlack Voters DROP Hillary Clinton to Support Bernie Sanders & MLK's Legacy
<iframe width="854" height="480" src="
" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>Yupy
(154 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Certain groups, unwilling to wait for Bernie to connect with black people, have decided to go around them, replacing black voices in post after post, article after article with lying voices, often white ones, pretending to speak for the black community.
These lies are an attempt to fool people into believing Bernie has support that no black groups have given him because Bernie has not yet told them what they need to hear from any candidate they can support.
This attempt to strip black voters of their political power doesn't only risk irreparably offending this CRITICAL 13% of all voters, a percentage no Democrat can win without.
What will happen when the truth comes out and white and Hispanic Democrats, and other minorities, like our First Americans, learn that Bernie's campaign is treating our black citizens with the same dismissive contempt as the white-supremacist GOP?
I can tell you for ME: Bernie will put a stop to this massive campaign of lies, denounce it, and start building genuine bridges with minorities, or he is mud in my eyes.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)was made by an African American who also made "We Can! We Will", a Sanders fan ad
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Snagglepuss. We've got your name and your game.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)The pattern is hardly...difficult to understand.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)"What will happen when the truth comes out and white and Hispanic Democrats, and other minorities, like our First Americans, learn that Bernie's campaign is treating our black citizens with the same dismissive contempt as the white-supremacist GOP?
I can tell you for ME: Bernie will put a stop to this massive campaign of lies, denounce it, and start building genuine bridges with minorities, or he is mud in my eyes."
What truth has to come out? Please explain the 'dismissive contempt that is the same as the white-supremacist GOP' as well as the 'massive campaign of lies.' How is he 'stripping black voters of their political power?
Those are heavy accusations. Link to proof of these truths please, or delete.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Then search the problem being brought here out in the larger world. It's not rare. It's not obscure.
It's something you really NEED to know about if you want to elect Bernie.
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)About a quarter involve 'black' issues - Killer Mike, MLK, one on reparations, nothing too far out of the ordinary. The other thread titles tell me that this is a real person with varied interests, definitely not a sock puppet, troll mor mole.
I still don't see anything substantiating your claims.
If I NEED to know, perhaps you should elucidate. It IS obscure.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)This tells us nothing about what YOU mean.
What DO you mean? Sounds like you've fallen for GOP lies with no basis in fact.
"treating our black citizens with the same dismissive contempt as the white-supremacist GOP? "
This really needs some 'splainin'. It's right from the GOP meme machine circa June! Why are you promoting it?
artislife
(9,497 posts)JudyM
(29,274 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Take a clue, please, Judy, and spread it around: 58% of all minority caucus votes in Iowa voted for Hillary.
Only 34% voted for Bernie -- in an extremely Bernie-friendly state.
JudyM
(29,274 posts)Check this out, for example: http://usuncut.com/politics/black-lives-shattered-how-the-clintons-built-their-empire-on-white-supremacy/
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Honesty isn't just a moral thing, it has great function. Without it, we're idiots.
artislife
(9,497 posts)The OP doesn't say all Black Voters or even most Black Voters.
Chill.
bec
(107 posts)Clinton claims to be a person for "the people", but she can't stand being around the people. During the MLK event here in SC. Both O'Malley and Sanders marched from the church to the state house. Hillary did not march, Not only did she not march, but she made everyone wait an hour in the cold. Then had the a itinerary changed so she could go first, instead of last like the printed sheet stated. That was blatant disrespect of everybody who waiting in the cold, and the organizers of the event She is not a person for the common people
Divernan
(15,480 posts)She doesn't appear to be in the necessary physical shape to walk any distance in cold weather. And certainly Bill, with his history of heart disease and quadruple by-pass surgery should avoid cold weather exertion completely.
bec
(107 posts)It is about .5 miles. Not far at all.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)And I wanted to make the point that she got her doctor to write a letter stating she was in good health - I read that letter, and there were no limitations on walking. I quote: She is in excellent physical condition and fit to serve as President of the United States. Walking a half a mile should be well within her capacities, if she is in fact "in excellent physical condition".
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/hillary-clinton-health-excellent-doctor-letter-2016-campaign-120861#ixzz3z3d6uNC5
bec
(107 posts)She might have had a paid speaking event with Goldman Sachs she could not pass up.
George II
(67,782 posts).....and caution by the Secret Service.
I suggest people do a little research before they make such accusations.
I was at a rally for our Governor a few years ago where Bill Clinton spoke. We had to be inside in our seats an hour before the rally started, and we had to remain in our seats until Clinton was back in his car and had left the grounds.
Same thing for Obama a year ago - we had to be inside THREE hours before the event started and also had to stay there until Obama's motorcade was on its way.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)MisterFred
(525 posts)Candidates don't have to do what the secret service says. They're not lords & masters, it's the other way around. If she wanted to not force her way to the head of the speaking list or if she wanted to march, she could have.
I remember going to a Kerry rally in Reno in 2004 and the secret service were sending everyone through a metal detector/scanning with wands. About an hour after the event was supposed to start, they just gave up and let everyone in. I thought it was a bad decision, but now I'm guessing the order came from Kerry.
give her that maybe she wasn't healthy enough to walk. But to keep everyone waiting for an hour was not cool. It had nothing to do with secret service. Sorry just my opinion.
George II
(67,782 posts)...a single one that started on time, or even close to on time.
Clinton appeared in Cromwell CT in 1992 (yeah, I know it was a "Clinton" , he was about 90 minutes late. A couple of weeks later Al Gore appeared at Wesleyan University - he was more than an hour late.
That's the way it is, for EVERY candidate, and people who regularly attend these types of events understand it.
bec
(107 posts)Considering they were in Charleston the night before. It wasn't as if she was coming a far distant. They had this on the books and she should have been on time, or at least close to on time, but no over an hour late.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)mcar
(42,372 posts)as George has patiently explained. Yet you continue your "concerns" about HRC's health, which are completely and totally unfounded.
cannabis_flower
(3,765 posts)people who had to go to the restroom couldn't leave their seats? That seems unreasonable.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)just walking a couple of blocks would have better than nothing. On the other hand, it doesn't surprise me because I think it's all an act for her. I see her as a diva so it makes sense that she believes the itinerary absolutely needs to accommodate her first and foremost. Your story really is an interesting snapshot of her.
If she was for the common people she would have been working with Jimmy Carter instead of giving speeches, she certainly wouldn't have accepted $300,000 from UCLA, a public university for giving a 1 1/2 hour speech.
forest444
(5,902 posts)That has to mean something.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)It's pretty typical of why black voters are NOT "dropping" Hillary Clinton for Bernie. A profoundly silly lie that can be debunked in literally seconds.
Propane Jane ?@docrocktex26: Seriously, what is Bernie going to say in response to Trump demonizing Muslims, the undocumented, or "the Blacks"? Down with Goldman Sachs?
7:59 AM - 27 Jan 2016
There is no black person so prestigious and well regarded in America that he or she is not still in danger every day of being arrested for driving while black, stopped at gunpoint from entering their own nice homes while black, stopped and searched while strolling down their own low-crime block with their children while black.
Not to mention the problems their children face. Our friends' 15-year-old son was arrested for picking up trash in a public ball park with his church group. He pointed to his youth minister running over to support him, but the police hustled him into the police car and hurried away before the minister could run up. Then they played a little game of sending him rotating among the many LAPD precincts so the boy's parents and church group couldn't find him. Only they'd seen this old game before -- they called out dozens of volunteers who stationed themselves at EVERY precinct covering an area larger than some states until the boy was rescued.
Bernie needs to address a lot more than just Wall Street if he wants anyone to "drop" Hillary for him.
JudyM
(29,274 posts)problem in the US?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)because she has promised to address their problems. Look, Judy, you want Bernie? Then SUPPORT the coalition of progressives that he cannot win without. Blacks are 18-33+% of the population in the southern states. It doesn't matter how well Bernie does in New Hampshire, and even Nevada, if his momentum is stopped DEAD in
South Carolina (Feb 20 - a little over 2 weeks away)
Alabama (Mar 1 - Super Tuesday)
Arkansas
Georgia
Oklahoma
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia
Kentucky
Louisiana (Mar 5)
Mississippi
Florida
North Carolina (Mar 15)
You can start by recognizing posts that blacks right here on DU find profoundly offensive. And why.
JudyM
(29,274 posts)appealing to black voters than Bernie is. Ok, I am already aware of that, and I am interested in understanding it. You are more up to speed on this than I am, without a doubt. I am listening. You say Hillary is making promises that you like.
It is puzzling to me that with Bernie's long history and consistent support of PoC issues and Hillary/Bill's flawed policies and statements that have been hurtful to blacks, that it is such a clear decision for you to be in Hillary's camp. And you say all this with anger, or frustration, it's hard to tell... Clearly you are very emotional about it. So point me to something that overviews your perspective; I am genuinely interested.
Is there something offensive about Bernie to you? Does his lifetime of civil rights support not seem authentic?
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)Stuckinthebush
(10,847 posts)They don't like math. Don't scare them.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)uponit7771
(90,364 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)Because here's an OP that's excited about people being excited about something.
And then there's your post that protests it. A post that looks like a shaking fist in a room of people enjoying themselves.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)NJCher
(35,730 posts)Sanders will attack the systemic inequities, where, unfortunately, Clinton will not be able, due to her slurping at the trough from Wall Street, the banks, insurance companies, and the pharmaceuticals.
Cher
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)appalachiablue
(41,171 posts)Honesty, boldness and trustworthy are some of the reasons Bamberg decided to change his support to Sanders recently. The Vermont candidate's position on single-payer health care is a critical issue in Bamberg's area and another main reason for switching his endorsement to Sanders in Jan. from Clinton in Dec.
The S. C. state representative and attorney was a prominent figure in the effort to take the Confederate flag down from the South Carolina Statehouse.
Justin T. Bamberg was also the lawyer for the family of Walter Scott, the police-shooting victim. Mr. Scott, age 50 and unarmed, was shot and killed in April 2015 while running away from North Charleston police officer Michael Slager. Slager was subsequently arrested, indicted, denied bail for months and then released earlier this month once a new trial date was set. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/justin-bamberg-bernie-sanders_us_56a6447be4b076aadcc7366b
~ FEELIN' THE BERN IN SOUTH CAROLINA, THE PALMETTO STATE!!
appalachiablue
(41,171 posts)And his message is rapidly connecting with people and communities all over the US!
appalachiablue
(41,171 posts)"In South Carolina How Bernie Sanders Could Actually Pull Off an Upset- Surprising Numbers of South Carolinians Like Bernie--If They've Heard of Him", In These Times, Feature by David Moberg, Jan. 25, 2016. An excellent article.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280102739
Bernie shakes hands at an event in South Carolina in Nov., 2015.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Bernie Sanders will be a president for ALL the people. His record speaks for itself.
Huge K&R!!!
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Just incredible. Thanks snugglepuss,
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Wow
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)On Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:50 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Black Voters DROP Hillary Clinton to Support Bernie Sanders & MLK's Legacy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511123352
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This OP is incredibly offensive. The video is over a month old and NO ONE in this video says that Sanders is continuing MLK's legacy in direct contradiction to this OP title. This is the kind of thing that black DUers have been saying for months is a slap in their faces and a disgusting and needless co-opting of MLK's legacy. If a Hillary video was posted that showed her trying to co-opt MLK's legacy, this board would rightfully be in flames. And when you factor in that Hillary's AA support is significantly higher than Bernie Sanders' this video can rightfully be called as dishonest as it is unnecessary.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 2, 2016, 05:04 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You're kidding, right?
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh for christ's sake. The title doesn't even say "Sanders is continuing MLK's legacy" - it says black voters are supporting MLK's legacy. Furthermore, carrying on on a legacy (that is, furthering ideas and goals) - is hardly "co-opting" in the first place. Don't hide ideas with which you disagree. Argue your position in the thread.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The Op just posted the video title. Argue it in the replies. That's what this forum is for.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alert abuse. Don't like it? Make your opinion known to the person who posted it, don't ask a jury to do your dirty work.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Dr. West spoke about Bernie continuing MLK's legacy, in substance if not in the exact words. I think the post should stand.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)I was hoping this would be an 0-7 leave outcome.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Wow It almost seems like some people here don't want anything positive about Bernie and POC posted for discussion.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Sickening
Ino
(3,366 posts)PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)Is that for real?!
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/12/clinton_logo_rosa_parks.html
The logo, which depicts a bespectacled black woman sitting down with her hair in a bun and her purse in her lap, suggests that the deceased Parks is (or would be) a Clinton supporter. And a whole bunch of folks cried foul.
One relatively mild Twitter criticism expressed surprise that Clinton was able to travel back in time and secure Parks' endorsement. An angrier comment suggested that it's an example of white people co-opting the things black people have done.
The best response, though, was the tweet directed at Clinton that said, "You could've at least let Rosa sit at the front of the logo."
Then there was Hillary co-opting Kwanzaa into her logo...
http://www.adweek.com/prnewser/it-seems-twitter-believes-hillary-clinton-has-a-pandering-logo/120313
PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)That is being terribly sensitive and Juror #7 summed it up best.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,417 posts)Darren SandsVerified account
?@darrensands
Scoop: South Carolina Rep. Joe Neal to endorse @BernieSanders. His Richland Co. is the second most populous in S.C.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511122524
Thanks for the thread, snagglepuss.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Is this claim supported by anything, y'know, tangible?
Polls?
News articles?
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Cause he made the video and it's his title.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)who all DROPPED supporting Hillary so they could support Sanders.
UsNotMe#
Tarc
(10,476 posts)and nothing to show any actual inroads into the PoC vote by Sanders.
Thanks for the clarification.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)which means that what they say and do will reverberate in their communities.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Cool story bro.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)think and vote the same, her campaign is dead in the water. People have been holding "Bernie doesn't have black people" over his head for weeks. IF this changes, it's over for her.
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)I remember Hillary and Bill saying President Obama's candidacy was a fairytale, a fantasy, an effort tantamount to that of Jessie Jackson's run for the office. Karma is a mother, maybe that is what is going to happen in this case, only the fairytale/fantasy may be Hillary trying to garner the AA vote.
Beacool
(30,251 posts)What did you think about the Obama thing calling Hillary the senator from Punjab? Did you like that? Or what about the Obama handout that was covered up, the press never reported on, implying that I was a crook. Scouring me scathing criticism over my financial reports. Ken Starr spent $70 million to find out that I wouldnt take a nickel to see the cow jump over the moon.
So you can take a shot at Mark Penn if you want. It wasnt his best day. He was hurt. He felt badly we didnt do better in Iowa. But the idea that one of these campaigns is positive and the other is negative when I know the reverse is true and I have seen it and I have been blistered by it for months is a little tough to take. Just because of the sanitizing coverage thats in the media doesnt mean the facts arent out there.
It is wrong that Sen. Obama got to go through 15 debates trumpeting his superior judgment and how he had been against the war in every year, enumerating the years, and never got asked one time not once, Well, how could you say that when you said in 2004 you didnt know how you would have voted on the resolution? You said in 2004 there was no difference between you and George Bush on the war. And you took that speech youre now running on off your Web site in 2004. And theres no difference in your voting record and Hillarys ever since. Give me a break. This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale Ive ever seen.
Bill was referring to Obama's claim that he hadn't supported the IWR, although he wasn't in the Senate at the time. He was saying that Obama's claims about not supporting the war, while voting to finance it once he became a senator, was a fairy tale. He wasn't saying that Obama's campaign was a fairy tale. There's a big difference.
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Please consider creating an OP with them.
Beacool
(30,251 posts)Well, he was stating a fact. Jesse Jackson did win SC twice.
madokie
(51,076 posts)that Bernie has done is introduce me to Killer Mike. I hope Killer Mike has a place in a Sanders administration. Possibly in Race relations
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)Empowerer
(3,900 posts)about themselves . . .
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)in the AA community, evidenced by black leaders and artists dropping Hillary and publicly declaring their support of Bernie. It seems to me that many supporters of Hillary across every demographic see her as a known quantity and for them it's a matter of going with the devil you you know, than the devil you don't. There is no way that Black leaders like Turner and Bamberg, to name just two, would throw their support to Sanders if they didn't believe in the depths of their being that Sanders is the one who best serve the interests of their community.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Feelin the Bern! Go Bernie Go!
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)are the ones that can and will be reached. These videos are a way of doing that. One voter at a time.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)SamKnause
(13,110 posts)The man who cares about, 'We The People' !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FEEL THE BERN
quickesst
(6,283 posts)Didn't hear recently about Bernie Sanders putting the homeless out of a shelter on the coldest day of the year so he could hold a rally?
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)quickesst
(6,283 posts).... thought I heard that somewhere.
kath
(10,565 posts)Donkees
(31,453 posts)DemocraticSocialist8
(396 posts)I can say that I'll be voting for Sanders in NC during our state primary.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,699 posts)I'm glad you're here!
We need you, and so does Bernie.
DemocraticSocialist8
(396 posts)I've been a Bernie supporter from the very beginning because as a person of color, I believe he would be better than Clinton for my community. I think a lot of the support she gets from people of color is because of name recognition and certain folks being maybe a tad afraid to take their political destiny in their own hands. I also have a problem with the Clinton role in the drug war and mass incarceration. She's being given a complete pass on that issue.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)We have a group just for supporters of Bernie Sanders where we can take a break from the primary back and forth and just discuss Bernie and the issues with like minded people.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1280
NowSam
(1,252 posts)Great to meet you, DS8! I like your handle.