Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAre you OK with continuing the bipartisan Goldman Sachs monopoly
on Treasury cabinet appointments? Just wondering how people feel about criminal welfare kings rigging WHOOPS running our economy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 873 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are you OK with continuing the bipartisan Goldman Sachs monopoly (Original Post)
Admiral Loinpresser
Feb 2016
OP
"A Sanders Administration will not bring forth a Goldman Sachs Secretary of Treasury"
ElliotCarver
Feb 2016
#3
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)1. I'm not ok with that.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)2. I was for it before I was against it nt
ElliotCarver
(74 posts)3. "A Sanders Administration will not bring forth a Goldman Sachs Secretary of Treasury"
paraphrasing but it still gives me chills. he's so darn inspiring
angrychair
(8,732 posts)4. Are you allowed
To say "Goldman Sachs" I thought that that was hate speech?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)5. Bernie has previously indicated he might tap a Robert Reich for
Treasury Secretary. I personally would be ok with that choice.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)6. Nope.