Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum24 Hours Later: Has Hillary Released the Goldman Sacs Transcripts Yet?
We're waiting.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
20 replies, 1058 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
24 Hours Later: Has Hillary Released the Goldman Sacs Transcripts Yet? (Original Post)
Joe the Revelator
Feb 2016
OP
It doesn't matter. There won't be anything incriminating in those texts. She is smarter than that.
ladjf
Feb 2016
#3
I understand your point. But, my take on it is that they would just rather keep the speeches from
ladjf
Feb 2016
#6
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)1. she is looking into it
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)2. "it" being the abyss
ladjf
(17,320 posts)3. It doesn't matter. There won't be anything incriminating in those texts. She is smarter than that.
polichick
(37,152 posts)4. If that were true, they would have been released.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)5. love to see some actual video
I know of some has to be out there
polichick
(37,152 posts)7. Me too - tone and emphasis would be telling.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)6. I understand your point. But, my take on it is that they would just rather keep the speeches from
public scrutiny out of fear that there might be something there. Also, it's likely that there are private records like the Romney tape that might surface anyway.
DamnYankeeInHouston
(1,365 posts)12. She has to edit them first to add, "Cut it out."
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)19. That shouldn't take too long, a little white out
and the phrase used "cut the check" can be changed to "cut it out" in like 1 minute.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)14. And if/when she releases them and, as usual her detractors can't find anything incriminating in them
they will insist that this is further proof of her corruption because the only reason they aren't incriminating is that she doctored them.
We know this playbook by heart.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)8. she is still checking with herself. nt
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)9. But herself keeps changing the answer. nt
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)10. Those will be released to the public
a few years after the heat death of the universe.
Maybe not even then.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)11. Maybe they are under here
Ino
(3,366 posts)13. We should demand she releases them before Nevada
Bernie released his medical before Iowa
frylock
(34,825 posts)15. tick-tock
allthatjazz
(59 posts)16. The Countdown
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)17. Has Bernie released his emails? nt
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)18. Look, a red herring!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)20. She's an incrementalist. She'll get around to releasing them in 2147. (nt)