Tried and missed. Not one of her 250K speeches.

It was the Clinton global initiative dinner address. That is why it is on video. Let's see her actual paid speeches she was paid at least 250K per.

Of course the OP is dishonest.

Its the only way they have of painting her in a positive light.

SHOCKING!

up is down...black is white.

Feels like the George W Bush administration years.

Or ignorant.

Take tour pick.

Not my opinion--It's empirical.

Good post.

(OK, I'm a little late to this thread )

How utterly horrifying.

Has she no shame?

<<<----- just in case

...because I'm sure they're all just like this one.

not a direct payment to the Clintons.

"Only one"? That wasn't the point of the Initiative. It was to empower women in small businesses, not at GS.

about that.

I guess that doesn't count.



http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/pages/access-to-capital-for-women-entrepreneurs.html

Noa Meyer, global head of the Goldman Sachs 10,000 Women program, describes the firm’s partnership with the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank to create the first-ever global finance facility for women-owned small and medium-sized enterprises.

you have the same relation with the truth as your candidate does.

went to the Clintons personally.

The lie is that the video is from one of the three speeches she was questioned about. But you knew that.

That is a lie or you should post a link and I will apologize.

It is a fact she made over 600K in paid speeches to GS and those speeches did go straight into her pockets. Let's see you post those videos. Do you think she should release the transcripts she has of those speeches?

and sloppier posts that fail to distinguish between personal payments and donations to the Foundation.

She said that is what they offered. Show me where all of tgat money went to the foundation. I assume you have proof?

To them personally.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-earn-more-than-25-million-in-speaking-fees-since-january-2014/2015/05/15/52605fbe-fb4d-11e4-9ef4-1bb7ce3b3fb7_story.html

whose fees went to the Clintons with those that went to the Foundation.

But the list itself doesn't include the Goldman Sachs speech -- probably because the donation went to the Foundation.

Speeches and this one was not included as it was a foundation speech. Comedy gold you guys are.

You must have even looked at the list

Read the link that it comes from.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-03/every-hillary-and-bill-clinton-speech-2013-fees

As you'd expect, Goldman *also* contributed to the Clinton Foundation.

This is not the speech where Hillary was paid over $600,000 to speak to Goldman Sachs.

Let's see the complete video and transcript on that one.

There isn't a single speech where she was paid 600k to speak.

If you are going to callout something for not being factual, get your facts right first.

for three speeches.

Hey if someone is going to try to callout facts, they should have their facts straight.

It looks bad otherwise.

Is a lot more than 600K. A good yearly income for a person. 225K-250K for a around a hour of speeking, WOW

The OP is a deliberate attempt to mislead. As long as we are getting facts right maybe you'll tell me how a post titled "A question every Sanders supporter must answer" was allowed in the Hillary group, then locked as off-topic in GD-P by an admin who then proceeded to lampoon the post in a third posting. I was wondering?

Good to know.

Maybe because people shouldn't drag group drama into GDP, keep it in the groups? Just a thought.

Hey all I did was lock it, I wasn't one of several alerters and we had 100% consensus to lock it...

So they should have been given a chance to answer or both threads should have been locked and certainly your own mocking thread-in a protected group should never have been left up. And yes-you are a host-not admin,but again you split hairs to dodge the actual message.

There is no reason to create several threads in response in GD.

And I guess you didn't like the picture of Hillary canvassing... It had such a catchy thread title I knew a few people would just have to read it.

And I'm not dodging the message (i.e. the SOP for GDP) in this case... It is what it is, it's written right at the top of each forum.

It shows your character.

Make an accusation, back it up.

Or just attack me personally when you know you've got nothing.

That's the usual around here.

You locked a thread in GDP posted specifically by a Sanders supporter because it called them out in a forum most could not reply in and did not lock your thread mocking the same incident also in a place where they could not reply. It is both abusive and cowardly.

Haha, got it.

Maybe I'll ask Bill to pin my post, I'm sure that will inform you about my character.

I await further personal attacks, have at me.

Excuse me while I go make more bad decisions that show my character. Lol.

Hillary was paid over $675,000 by Goldman Sachs alone for three speeches. That is JUST SHORT OF A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS PER SPEECH for the benefit of one corporation alone!! I think HRC has some explaining to do. The American people should see the complete transcripts and any and all videos of these speeches as well. Cui bono?

com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/05/hillary-clintons-campaign-resists-releasing-transcripts-from-goldman-speeches/

I know that.

It's not what you posted the first time, so when you attempt to call someone else out, get your facts right too.

Otherwise it looks foolish.

My company paid her $225,000 to speak for us, we loved it.

She spoke at my company too.

Talked about how Wall Street has been demonized

What am I trying to prove?

Sorry if I do not always believe an anonymous Internet poster.

Or give up enough personal information to be indentified.

You don't believe me, it's not my problem.

not to the Foundation?

I can't provide a video or a text of a nonexistent speech.

She got 675K and gave no speeches, WOW, that is breaking news.

Where have you seen amounts specifically given to her, personally?

Every source I have seen say SHE was paid 675K for at least 3 speeches. She also made at least 200K per speech at several colleges and Howard Dean ate lots of crow when he was proven wrong about that.

$153 million in Bill and Hillary Clinton speaking fees, documented

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-paid-speeches/

clients, and again on Oct 29, at Goldman’s tech summit. Both were question-and-answer sessions, according to people who attended, and at the second, Lloyd Blankfein, the chief executive and chairman of Goldman Sachs, was among her questioners. In June of that year she was also paid for an additional event that included Goldman and other groups. She was paid $225,000 for each.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/05/hillary-clintons-campaign-resists-releasing-transcripts-from-goldman-speeches/?_r=0




Here you go.

Sachs event held at the Clinton Foundation. And it is one of the speeches she's been criticized for.

That she was paid 675K for? Those are the speeches in question and you know it

It was a Clinton Global Inititive event, underwritten by Goldman Sachs. It is NOT one of the paid speeches to Goldman Sachs that she is being questioned about. You know that by now, obviously. But you just as obviously don't mind being disingenuous if you think it helps your candidate. By coincidence your candidate doesn't mind either.

She essentially talked about women's right, and how empowering it was to see so many women leaders, but also that they shouldn't consider their work done... Our CEO is male, she pointed at him, it was awkward but we all got through it.

She was a great speaker and I think it did empower some of my co-workers.

She also did admit she was satan, but no one got that part on video.

It's on our server and our internal website, I'm not about to post it here. I like my job and I'm not going to break some company policy by posting our internal stuff.

I also don't want everyone on DU to know who I work for.

Some anonymity is nice.

But yes she spoke, we paid $225,000 to hear it.

But I have a problem with a politician being paid obscene amounts of money by a corporation like Goldman Sachs who has proven that are untrustworthy. Goldman Sachs was a primary actor in the fall of the housing market in the US. Their bad acts left many Americans homeless and penniless here and damaged people and companies abroad as well. To make matter worse, we had to bail their evil asses out. Yup they are pretty close to Satan. And I like many Americans want to see those transcripts. What is being hidden? Cui bono?

<3

Nailed it.

And in case you didn't notice, you fell for the bait.

they had magical ability to foresee that debate moment a year in advance . . . .

But I forgot. Hillary has magical powers. She can do anything!

When I saw this I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. But come to find out this is not one of the paid speeches? If the op was aware of this then it is really disappointing. And rather shameful.

or we'll film her refusal and it's shit like this thread that's gonna make it fun to watch.

when I go to my Overseas sites - they're asking, too.

as if the payment for this bullshit slideshow on neo-liberalism wasn't quid pro quo for access in a future HRC white house run...

The horror AND she has the audacity to run for president with all of her experience. It's a shame, I tell ya. A low down dirty shame.

change facts.

about his stated desire to get rid of social security, then we will talk.

... that all the other attacks and smears are equally lame and baseless. Sheesh!

Go, Hillary!

to give this speech at a dinner Goldman Sachs hosted at the Clinton Foundation in honor of Goldman Sachs 10,000 Women initiative.

So this is one of the "Goldman Sachs speeches" for which she received payment that people have been talking about. The locale isn't the issue.

I don't think those that want her to release her speech transcripts are going to be happy unless it includes something like this:

" I want thank my Wall Street owners for providing me such a generous allowance to be allowed the privilege of addressing them tonight. In return, I will deliver the United States to them. and everything in it, so that we can offer it and the world to our Supreme Overlord, Thanos.

HAIL HYDRA!"