Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 07:39 AM Feb 2016

Why Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton are 2016's likely nominees

Donald Trump is way ahead in the polls for the Republican nomination.

Bernie Sanders will win the New Hampshire Primary on Tuesday, and he’s close to Hillary Clinton in national polls.

But neither Trump nor Sanders is likely to win!

In our new Fox News TV special, “Tech Revolution” at 8 and 11 pm ET Sunday night, we’ll explain why the better way to predict winners is to look at betting odds. They give Marco Rubio more than a 50 percent chance of winning the nomination, and Hillary Clinton an 80 percent chance.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/02/07/stossel-why-marco-rubio-and-hillary-clinton-are-2016s-likely-nominees.html
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton are 2016's likely nominees (Original Post) SecularMotion Feb 2016 OP
cant agree mgcgulfcoast Feb 2016 #1
I've only watched one GOP debate, one of the early ones Kentonio Feb 2016 #3
The real Rubio appeared last night ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #7
Either Tedito Or The Donald Have Better Chances Vogon_Glory Feb 2016 #2
nonsense bowens43 Feb 2016 #4
Rubio didn't seem all that ready for prime time at the debate. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #5
Those 2 are who the establishment want. And in natl polls, Rubio beats Clinton. RiverLover Feb 2016 #6
NOT AFTER LAST NIGHT. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #8
I disagree. I can imagine Hillary winning the primary, but not Rubio. Vinca Feb 2016 #9
 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
3. I've only watched one GOP debate, one of the early ones
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 08:42 AM
Feb 2016

And I thought exactly the same as you. He was like a rabbit in headlights in that one. At one point he repeated the same pre-rehearsed mini-speech twice almost word for word. I actually had to rewind to make sure the stream hadn't just skipped or something. It was actually embarrassing to watch.

It beggars belief that people are suggesting he'd be a threat to either Dem candidate, he's awful on the debate stage.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
7. The real Rubio appeared last night
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 09:16 AM
Feb 2016

It was NOT pretty.

Well, pretty pathetic, maybe.

This was his, "I am not a witch" moment, his "Don't retreat, reload" skit, his claim to fame for the rest of his political career. If he were toast, he'd be burnt on both sides.
Rubio died as a candidate last night and not even a boat load of Haitian voodoo masters will bring him back to some shadow of life.

Vogon_Glory

(9,118 posts)
2. Either Tedito Or The Donald Have Better Chances
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 08:32 AM
Feb 2016

Either Tedito the Calgary Kid or the Donald have better chances than Marco.

Bellowing bluster sells well in the red states and at the risk of having my post pulled, Tedito looks a LOT more "white" than Marco does. The latter is important in those states where the GOP base has been primed to be riled up about "illegal immigration."

Also, please consider your source. Reading between the lines is a skill that takes time to learn and is not encouraged by red state educators, but Rupert Murdoch and the Donald are currently feuding, and any Faux Cable Noise copy about the Donald IMO ought to be treated as suspect.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
5. Rubio didn't seem all that ready for prime time at the debate.
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 08:46 AM
Feb 2016

The "GOP establishment" wants Rubio? So what? The GOP establishment wanted Jeb!, too, and look how far that got them.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
6. Those 2 are who the establishment want. And in natl polls, Rubio beats Clinton.
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 08:47 AM
Feb 2016

But either one will work for them.

Literally.

Vinca

(50,278 posts)
9. I disagree. I can imagine Hillary winning the primary, but not Rubio.
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 09:20 AM
Feb 2016

This morning he's being compared to Dan Quayle. He's a real empty suit in Beatle boots.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Marco Rubio and Hilla...