2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy would a Baby Boomer support this establishment?
When they were young, so many of them rightfully rebelled against a Democratic establishment that was sending their fathers, brothers, husbands, friends and lovers to die in the jungles of Vietnam. They tossed out a liberal president who, like some Shakespearean monarch, had descended into madness and effectively destroyed the Cold War Liberal paradigm (you know, that which would sanction the desegregation of a restaurant while simultaneously napalming a peasant village overseas). They were unruly. They could be anarchic. And they were on the side of right. (And let it be said, these young rebels had plenty of help from older folks.)
So why are a substantial number of them in discord with today's youth, who are rightfully rebelling against a Democratic establishment that aided and abetted the Bush regime's Middle East slaughter as well as the gangsters who continue to plunder our wealth? Why are the young being dismissed as dreamers, by the very people who dared to dream as they dwelled in their own spring?
NOTE: This is not a blanket condemnation of a generation, as I've heard from just as many Boomers who either support radical reform or have shown respect and even grace in their debates.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Why change the status quo when you benefit from it?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)You have to continue to challenge your mind, to stay open to new ideas and realizing the things you've mistakenly or ignorantly supported for years or decades, to keep growing in order to avoid falling into a sort of 'this is the way the world works' support of the status quo and nostalgia for a 'better' time (ie one that was less challenging to you). It's not just boomers, but all of us.
We all have to keep thinking, keep changing, keep growing, challenging our own ideas as the world changes around us to avoid that trap.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)will never relinquish our vision of what is possible.
WIN, Bernie, WIN!
Stand up. Boomers for Bernie
ancianita
(36,066 posts)within the system, tolerating what they considered incremental change.
Half of them never realized that the other half of the generation were not monolithic in their values of restructuring a more verdant, just society. The country was so regionally divided, and there was no Internet to keep youthful bonds spread across their group. A huge number were of Republican families and decided to carry forward those "more pragmatic and realistic" ideas of economic survival of the fittest.
When the public service/ex-hippie half got ambushed by the Reaganites, they realized that they had to go at politics for the long game. They just didn't know how. And no one was helping them. They got "yeah, yeah, demonstrate, suckers." So they realized that the political survival of the fittest game matched the capitalist system.
From there we have post-Reagan events that you're more familiar with.
Just the perspective of one who has always paid attention to her peers trying all along to figure out what happened with us. I daresay Millennials will see their peers splitting off from their big push for 'fixing' things, as well.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)Somewhere along the way, the young boomer philosophy morphed into a greedy, ravenous capitalism. Their hatred of government shifted power into the hands of the corporations and billionaires. Every man for himself!
MisterP
(23,730 posts)NEAR you, heaven forfend--I'm looking at you, Santa Monica!), very into smart white-collar businesses like Wall Street, IT, and entertainment, very into living off the government cow's milk (until one day you want burgers), big on anyone being able to make it big (while the other 85% of us can't get pills and owe more on our diploma than our car)
it's not "the Boomers" but there's a big rentier wave in that generation and again with the late ex-Xers