Senator Sanders is doing just fine in head to head match up polls and I fear for Hillary in the general.

The lobbyist author has a different opinion from both me and the polls, but you know what they say about opinions -- Everyone has one.

Great response to the arrogant article. The sense of entitlement is stinking high to Heaven.

Does that matter to you?

Do you realize you're quoting a lobbyist? And that Ogilvny Government Relations, his firm, is a lobbying firm? And he is posting this on CNBC, of all places?

I mean, yeah, I can see why to him, Hillary is the only choice.

Sanders is no less electable than Hillary Clinton. Yeah, they'll go after Sanders and call him a socialist, the same thing they've said about Clinton for the last 20 years. The same thing they said about Obama. What Sanders doesn't have is the baggage of an e-mail scandal that the Republicans will spend millions trying to expose.

A black guy with the name Barack Hussein Obama survived being called every name in the book (Kenyan Communist, Manchurian Muslim, etc.). As you mentioned, the email thing is not going away for Hillary. It was a huge mistake to set up that private server and I wish it never happened because I am sick of hearing about it.

Given all of that, I would be curious to see Bernie get the opportunity to say that the Democratic nominee is absolutely not in the back pocket of corporations while the GOP nominee is 100% in the back pocket of corporations. It would be a huge clash of philosophy and he has a lot of winning issues that the majority of the public supports.

I'm thinking the repubs start to take a closer look at the Rosatom deal from when she was SecState. Her foundation received 2.35 million before the deal and Bill got a half million speaking engagement after the deal so close to 3 million so the State Department would sign off on a deal that sold 20% of our uranium production to the Russians in what appears to be a huge conflict of interest and for a company whose donations she failed to disclose to the White House despite assurances she would do exactly that while SecState.


Link to Rosatom (now called Uranium One) story here: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

An appeal to Baby Boomers.
Free public college and universal healthcare must be the reality and is the best reason for seniors to vote for Sanders. A vote for Clinton pulls the rug out from underneath your children's children and condemns them to lives less healthy than Baby Boomer's.

Come on, Mom and Dad, I'm your grown up son, and Hillary is bad for grandkids. Join me in making their future a strong one.

She is to interested in keeping the status quo to do anything for the rest of us.

Here's the proof using Trump:

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

General Election: Trump vs. Sanders
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html

I can't say he has a huge advantage over Hillary but if the odds are even equal, this meme is garbage.

Both have the advantage and I do believe that Americans in the general will not fail us.

and she's not even the best choice.

Oxymoron hits it on the nail head.

But it will not come to that.

Recent national CNN poll
Cruz 50%
Clinton 47%

Rubio 50%
Clinton 47%

Clinton 48%
Trump 47%

Sanders 50%
Cruz 47%

Sanders 49%
Rubio 48%

Sanders 50%
Trump 47%

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/01/26/politics/poll-republicans-results-cnn-orc/index.html

Recent national Qunnipiac poll

Clinton 46, Trump 41
Clinton 45, Cruz 45
Rubio 48, Clinton 41

Sanders 49, Trump 39
Sanders 46, Cruz 42
Sanders 43, Rubio 43

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2321

America can't tolerate another president who refuses to prosecute Wall Street criminals.

Bernie's $27 a head army of supporters will provide enough funds to take on the Republicans and win. And his campaign funding allows us to trust him that he will take on Wall Street crooks once he gets into office.

Current officeholders simply cannot conceive of funding their campaigns without lobbyist cash, so they say Bernie is a sure loser and endorse Hillary. And their lobbyist buddies say the same, as this article does.

We're going to show them how wrong they are.

Or we'll kill this adorable puppy


Your choice

because this lobbyist says so, seems more on the nose.

I'm not familiar with the "Democrat Party" Who are they and who are their candidates. I am aware of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party...and even the Green and Libertarian parties...but not the Democrat Party.

of people telling me what is going to happen in the future without at least them proving their abilities by giving me the next set of lottery numbers!! This selfishness has got to stop!

No: we are bringing the guy who will end the gun fight (= make corporate corruption illegal again).

WE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF THE BLOODY GUN FIGHT!

But please... I'm so sorry for interrupting. You were busy being tone-deaf, I believe?

No more Clintons.

I am awake

would be the beginning of the end for big money buying our government. 1. After blowing millions and millions and getting nothing for it. 2. We will have someone dedicated to taking the 1% out of power in elections.

Nothing but good stuff for out country with a Bernie win.

Yeah, this guy's credible

He has used right wing sources before.

I won't be voting for Clinton, BECAUSE I have been wide awake.

So fuck you Tony Bullock, lobbyist, Ogilvy Government Relations and the slimy corporation you rode in on.

It's maddening to hear "I love Bernie, but I'm going to vote for Hillary because she's the safest choice".

People who say this are not being pragmatic, they're not being rational, they're not being realistic. They're afraid.

They're afraid to use their power against a system that is not working for the American people, save a handful at the top. It's really sad they can't stand up and use their vote to say "enough is enough", even if in their heart that's how they really feel.

lol

...lost me right there. Whoever wrote this article can't even get the party's name right. Fuck them.

i am sure they aren't biased

Last edited Tue Feb 9, 2016, 02:10 PM - Edit history (1)

You have the worst crop of GOP candidates imaginable and she is not polling well against any of them.

She doesn't have a viable path to victory in November.