Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why didn't Obama bring up Mitt's missing tax returns or foreign investments? (Original Post) TroyD Oct 2012 OP
NY Times live blog notes that 47%, Mitt's taxes/Cayman money, and Bain were all missing. NRaleighLiberal Oct 2012 #1
you remember Ali's rope a dope? underthematrix Oct 2012 #2
I guess that will come up in the foreign policy debate. nt SunSeeker Oct 2012 #3
I don't disagree that Obama lost the debate alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #4
YEP underthematrix Oct 2012 #5

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
2. you remember Ali's rope a dope?
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 11:33 PM
Oct 2012

That seemed to be the game PBO was playing, which means any day now we will find out mittnocchio did not pay taxes for 10 years. I think PBO played it perfectly. In competitive situations other than boxing, rope-a-dope is used to describe strategies in which one party purposely puts itself in what appears to be a losing position, attempting thereby to become the eventual victor.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
4. I don't disagree that Obama lost the debate
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 11:44 PM
Oct 2012

But I absolutely agree with the Obama campaign's decision not to do 1) tax returns, 2) foreign investments, 3) 47%. Those are not points for a debate. Those are points for commercials.

I think it's very easy for white folks to misjudge the very fine line Obama has to walk on aggressiveness. He often hits it well. Tonight, he was way off, but direct confrontation on those three points just looks churlish. I agree with Will Pitt that Obama missed some opportunities, particularly on the $716 Billion. But on the points you bring up, no way. It's not for a face to face.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
5. YEP
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 11:56 PM
Oct 2012

They have something on mittnocchio and I believe it has something to do with what Sen. Reid has been saying. They also have something else on BirtherMitt but I don't know what that is.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why didn't Obama bring up...