Boooo..... Desperation from the Clintonistas

Just the type of candidate we need to beat the Republicans!

broadly involved in the democratic process. That's not revolutionary in my book.

when it comes to Bernie Sanders.

--imm

... and once they start to notice, they aren't liking what they see. Bernie will NOT be the nominee.

Go, Hillary! We love you!

thanks for posting this.

OMG! A couple of Sanders campaign workers made the mistake of using two LOGOS that the establishment had already purchased!

OMG! A couple of Sanders campaign workers tried to ORGANIZE some union members!

Is this the type of "vetting" that Clinton supporters always tell us we should be so worried about if Sanders wins the nomination?

someone else's logos to make it look like an organization is supporting you without permission. That's just basic and should require no explanation.

I have belonged to two unions. I have never seen outsiders coming into a workplace wearing union t-shirts to "organize" union members (who, actually belonging to the union, are already organized). If someone had seen such a thing, they would have been asked to leave.

Last edited Tue Feb 9, 2016, 09:35 PM - Edit history (1)

Your feigned logo and button OUTRAGE is its own self-parody. I really do not have to comment.

Again, if these are the mud flecks the Clintons are reduced to flinging, Sanders and his whole campaign are obviously clean as a whistle.

like a parody to us.

And BS's campaign did screw up here.

LOL at it being low level people - you would not give Hillary quarter for that.

I understand that the exact same charge applies to the vast majority of other national political candidates, but that's what Sanders whole campaign is all about! So it's basically impossible for Sanders to let Clinton off the hook on that.

He said he wanted to create a Political Revolution.

It's a name . . . like the Reagan Revolution. Instead of being egotistical - he's not calling it the Sanders Revolution. He is calling for a Political Revolution.

Very different things. Even someone as dense as Dana Milbank should understand that.

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/07/21/hillary-clinton-no-progressive

^snip^

Hillary Clinton Is No Progressive

Democratic presidential frontrunner, however, is one of the nation's great flip-floppers

As a strong challenge from the left emerges in the form of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, who was once thought to be headed for a coronation in the Democratic presidential primary, has tried to recast herself as a progressive champion. However, in her mad dash to the left, Clinton cannot escape her history of supporting, as the First Lady and then as a senator, the decidedly centrist and corporate-friendly policies of her husband, President Bill Clinton.

The contrast in views espoused by First Lady/ Sen. Clinton, versus 2008, and to a greater extent, 2016 presidential candidate Clinton, could emerge as a major problem for her campaign. Although Clinton has been extremely close-lipped to the media thus far in her latest bid for the Democratic nomination, by attempting to portray herself in speeches as a progressive during a time in which the political winds of the millennial generation are blowing left, Clinton has unwittingly shown herself to be a consummate flip-flopper who takes the positions that are most likely to return her to the White House.

A runthrough on a litany of issues important to progressives reveals a candidate in Clinton who once held decidedly anti-progressive views on many of the important questions of the day.




More at link.

You're a little late, this manufactured scandal was the meme DU jour two days ago.

I must have missed it when Bernie referred to himself as a revolutionary, do you have a link?