2016 Postmortem

grasswire

(50,130 posts) Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:32 PM Feb 2016

DAvid Brock's MMFA using decades old photos of Hillary on facebook

Interesting.

Brock is being roundly criticized on facebook for turning his agenda over to the primary election of Hillary. Many stories defending her are posted to facebook each day, and the photos being used of Hillary's face (I just noticed) are decades old.

Remember who Brock is, and his record with attempting to destroy Anita Hill.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DAvid Brock's MMFA using decades old photos of Hillary on facebook (Original Post) grasswire Feb 2016 OP

"Roundly criticized" cosmicone Feb 2016 #1

WRONG grasswire Feb 2016 #2

Always with the victimhood mentality. Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #3

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)

1. "Roundly criticized"

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Tue Feb 9, 2016, 06:41 PM

Feb 2016

means swarmed, stalked and inundated with rude posts by Bernie Supporters.

Just like many others who dared to support Hillary.

It is never about how and why Bernie is a better candidate. It is ALWAYS about how evil and horrible Hillary is and anyone who supports her should be penalized by trashing of their facebook pages.

mmmm hmmmmm

grasswire

(50,130 posts)

2. WRONG

Reply to cosmicone (Reply #1)

Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:29 PM

Feb 2016

the criticisms come from people who have supported MMFA over several decades because of its objectivity and fine reporting on media bias. Those people are now seeing a hijacking of MMFA by its founder, David Brock, for his candidate, Hillary Clinton, for whom he also runs a Super PAC.

Has nothing to do with how evil and horrible Hillary is. It's about the integrity of MMFA ---- many people have supported MMFA with donations and with advocacy for years.

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)

3. Always with the victimhood mentality.

Reply to cosmicone (Reply #1)

Tue Feb 9, 2016, 11:30 PM

Feb 2016

Time to focus on winning primaries, and not how mean the world is.

Reply to this discussion