Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 02:29 PM Oct 2012

David Corn: Why Obama Didn't Mention the 47 Percent Video


David Corn: Why Obama Didn't Mention the 47 Percent Video

full article here: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/10/why-obama-didnt-mention-47-percent-denver-debate

After the first presidential debate in Denver—which an on-the-attack Mitt Romney seemed to exploit better than a noncombative President Barack Obama—at least one question loomed: Why had the president not once referred to the 47 percent video that showed Romney denigrating half of Americans as moochers and victims who don't assume responsibility for their lives? After all, this video seemed to have sent the Romney campaign reeling, and focus groups conducted by both campaigns have found it had a serious impact on voter perceptions of Romney.

The morning after the debate, I contacted several Democratic strategists. They each said they were puzzled by Obama's silence on this topic and by his decision not to say a word about Romney's days at Bain Capital. "This is the stuff that has been working for us," one remarked. "Bain, 47 percent, Romney not empathizing with the middle class. Why not mention it?"

The Obama campaign does have an explanation. When I asked a top campaign official why Obama had made no mention of Romney's 47 percent remark, he said,

Not that we won't talk about it again. We will. But most compelling hearing it from Romney himself. We've got that on the air at a heavy dollar amount in key states. And it's sunk in. Ultimately the president's goal last night was to speak past the pundits and directly to the undecided voter tuning in for the first time about the economic choice and his plans to restore economic security.

It's clear, one Democratic strategist said, that Obama's inner circle concluded it was best not to turn the debate into a slugfest and hit Romney personally. That might come across as not presidential. It could distract from his aim of persuading those few remaining undecideds that they should see this election as a choice between two starkly different visions for the future and select his. Besides, there are weeks of ads to come, and if the 47 percent theme continues to resonate, the campaign certainly can keep producing ads that use the video as ammo.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Corn: Why Obama Didn't Mention the 47 Percent Video (Original Post) trailmonkee Oct 2012 OP
You KNOW RMoney had a dozen or more pre-crafted zingers using that 47% term. MADem Oct 2012 #1
Exactly truthN08 Oct 2012 #4
Interesting... socialaidem Oct 2012 #2
Yup. JanetLovesObama Oct 2012 #5
The fucking moderator should've asked about it. I wish Charlie Gibson or some other gotcha kinda... phleshdef Oct 2012 #3
Hell, as much as I despise JanetLovesObama Oct 2012 #6
It would've given Rmoney a chance to explain it ... "taken out of context" etc. Bake Oct 2012 #7
Damage to Romney already inflicted ThoughtCriminal Oct 2012 #8
Romney certainly has response prepared unc70 Oct 2012 #9

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. You KNOW RMoney had a dozen or more pre-crafted zingers using that 47% term.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 02:39 PM
Oct 2012

He was chomping at the bit to use them, to try to flip the term against the Democratic ticket.

He was DENIED.

truthN08

(275 posts)
4. Exactly
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:18 PM
Oct 2012

Robme wanted to put that 47% meme to bed last night and he was denied the opportunity to do it. This way they have the remaining weeks to hammer him on it without giving him that large an audience to try and explain it away. You can't always have instant gratificaton. The short game is "Romney had a night" but he long game is getting President Obama 4 more years.

socialaidem

(89 posts)
2. Interesting...
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:09 PM
Oct 2012

I still find it odd though. With the millions of viewers watching, it's still shocking they wouldn't bring up the video.

 

JanetLovesObama

(548 posts)
5. Yup.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:23 PM
Oct 2012

I agree. And I am pissed. Fifty million viewers watching and all they saw was Romney hammering Obama with lie after lie after lie and Obama looking down at his hands not responding with anything ! Well how damn "presidential" did THAT look?

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
3. The fucking moderator should've asked about it. I wish Charlie Gibson or some other gotcha kinda...
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:16 PM
Oct 2012

...guy had been moderating. Someone like that would've asked about it.

 

JanetLovesObama

(548 posts)
6. Hell, as much as I despise
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:25 PM
Oct 2012

David Gregory I honestly believe even HE would've asked about it. jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezus.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
7. It would've given Rmoney a chance to explain it ... "taken out of context" etc.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:54 PM
Oct 2012

Maybe better to just leave it out there. Rmoney wasn't going to bring it up, that's for sure.

Bake

ThoughtCriminal

(14,049 posts)
8. Damage to Romney already inflicted
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 04:49 PM
Oct 2012

I'm guessing Romney had a focus-group tested, "clever" joke just waiting for that moment.

unc70

(6,119 posts)
9. Romney certainly has response prepared
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 05:05 PM
Oct 2012

While hard to imagine a response as effective as Reagan's regarding age, they probably have something they believe might mitigate its impact, particularly if used by Obama directly and thus becoming more like the usual attacks back and forth between candidates.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»David Corn: Why Obama Did...